Nah it’s the same as 2 mate . TigerMAFSYou would too if you had Pick 6
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Nah it’s the same as 2 mate . TigerMAFSYou would too if you had Pick 6
Let me guess, with tigers pick 18?Your F1 should be able to get Armstrong the way Cal has him sliding.
You’ll be wrapt with em both. Even one of them. Can play.I get that there's this consensus of 6 amazing mids and nothing else which is why we should be upset, but Tauru looks like an absolute beast to me and Travaglia looks like a jet too. No issue if those are the players we end up with.
nah we are all goodWith Tauru not likely getting inside the top 5 at the moment
North In: Pick 5, F1 (Tigers), F2 (Tigers)
North Out: Pick 2, F1, F3
Rich In: Pick 2, F1(North)
Rich Out: Pick 6, F1, F2
Dees In: Pick 6, F3(North)
Dees Out: Pick 5
1. Lalor - Richmond
2. FOS - Richmond
3. Jagga - Blues
4. Draper - Adelaide
5. North - Tauru
6. Dees - Langford
F3 North going out can be changed to F2 out, but feel this more fair
If Armstrong was still on the table after the 17th pick, would you consider it?Let me guess, with tigers pick 18?
Any concern about the Lalor, Smilie, Taranto, Hopper midfield mix for the next 5-6 years in such a fast paced/running game now?nah we are all good
Maybe in your dreamsLet me guess, with tigers pick 18?
This 6 amazing mids piece is a fallacy.I get that there's this consensus of 6 amazing mids and nothing else which is why we should be upset, but Tauru looks like an absolute beast to me and Travaglia looks like a jet too. No issue if those are the players we end up with.
Bit of a whisper a while back that we want to pair up the Whitlocks.
Any concern about the Lalor, Smilie, Taranto, Hopper midfield mix for the next 5-6 years in such a fast paced/running game now?
Your draft hand is the envy of most of the comp. Second best behind Richmond. I also think you'll trade 32 and 47 for 27.I get that there's this consensus of 6 amazing mids and nothing else which is why we should be upset, but Tauru looks like an absolute beast to me and Travaglia looks like a jet too. No issue if those are the players we end up with.
I think you might be disappointed mate. But let's see. Blair much smarter than that. Our F1 worth more than pick 18, to anyone. But maybe you’ll be right. Best thing is we find out.Maybe in your dreams
Nah, he doesn't have that "white line fever" that you need from a KPF (from what I've been reliably informed) The same fella did say that Faull does have that competitive/combatative streak so he'd be my preference. Just going on the whispers shared on our board that the Whitlocks are targetsIf I was Richmond I'd go shanahan personally.
With Tauru not likely getting inside the top 5 at the moment
North In: Pick 5, F1 (Tigers), F2 (Tigers)
North Out: Pick 2, F1, F3
Rich In: Pick 2, F1(North)
Rich Out: Pick 6, F1, F2
Dees In: Pick 6, F3(North)
Dees Out: Pick 5
1. Lalor - Richmond
2. FOS - Richmond
3. Jagga - Blues
4. Draper - Adelaide
5. North - Tauru
6. Dees - Langford
F3 North going out can be changed to F2 out, but feel this more fair
I'm only messing. I'm sure you will start offering it very early until someone says yes or the guys you like are off the board.I think you might be disappointed mate. But let's see. Blair much smarter than that. Our F1 worth more than pick 18, to anyone. But maybe you’ll be right. Best thing is we find out.
How would you know he lacks mongrel ? Serious question?I like Smilie but think he lacks a major thing you can’t teach. He has no mongrel. If you are going to be a big mid like. Crips, Bont or Green they all have mogrel. Maybe that’s why despite his size he doesn’t seem to be able to have a contested mark
Any concern about the Lalor, Smilie, Taranto, Hopper midfield mix for the next 5-6 years in such a fast paced/running game now?
Nah, he doesn't have that "white line fever" that you need from a KPF (from what I've been reliably informed) The same fella did say that Faull does have that competitive/combatative streak so he'd be my preference. Just going on the whispers shared on our board that the Whitlocks are targets
I’m surprised there isn’t the same energy of Tigers reaching for Lalor as the rumours of when North would reach for Tauru. Nobody had Lalor as a top 5 pick 2 months ago. He has had a significant soft tissue injury and for my eye is a poor man’s Rayner (I do like Rayner). FOS had poor year but we can say that because his previous years were elite. Draper and Ashcroft had better years all round then both. Langford is to slow and Smillie has moved back in the draft for what I can only assume is poor Champs that hasn’t affect FOS or Lalor as much.
I would be taking Smith at 1 every day of the week personally.
He had a stellar year. Proven at VFL level. His fault seems his size and short kick but I believe he could be elite with right team. Strangely I think would be great at Tigers Blues also a great matchI would be taking Smith at 1 every day of the week personally.
Holy shit a rumourTigs & Aints in talks re pick 8
Yes, Shanahan did perform well in the VFL but it was against sub standard teams.Maybe. Shanahan looked very good in the vfl to me though. If not I would go faull or gerryn who are really competitive. I think the whitlocks are a bit overrated personally.
HAHAHAWith Tauru not likely getting inside the top 5 at the moment
North In: Pick 5, F1 (Tigers), F2 (Tigers)
North Out: Pick 2, F1, F3
Rich In: Pick 2, F1(North)
Rich Out: Pick 6, F1, F2
Dees In: Pick 6, F3(North)
Dees Out: Pick 5
1. Lalor - Richmond
2. FOS - Richmond
3. Jagga - Blues
4. Draper - Adelaide
5. North - Tauru
6. Dees - Langford
F3 North going out can be changed to F2 out, but feel this more fair