The Tigers board has been banging on about it since the talk of Port being involved with pick 10. Pretty fair chance that one of Langford/Jagga/Smillie get to pick 6.That could be why you are trying to hold 6 and get 2......Lalor/FOS/Jagga be some haul. All different but all compliment each other
Funny thing is that Blair knocked back using pick 10 & Baker to secure WCE pick 3 which would have seen them with Baker & 10 rather than Baker & 12 that they ended up with. Guess it was more a timeline thing though as the Freo trade couldn't go ahead until the Baker deal was done, we needed 14 from Baker to enable 10, 11 & 18 from Freo.
Got a feeling that the Tigers list management identified that picks 2 & 3 were gettable and if we had managed to secure 3 then it would have made using 6 in the trade with North a lot more palatable.