- Apr 2, 2000
- 75,475
- 25,330
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Chicago Bulls.
A little too much confidence from everybody. Every game in the PL is tough as even Luton have shown. It wont be so easy against United.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Man up Jodly, it'll be a cricket score.A little too much confidence from everybody. Every game in the PL is tough as even Luton have shown. It wont be so easy against United.
Yes. Liverpool supporters were confident they couldn’t beat United 7-0 and United supporters were confident going into the Bournemouth game after beating our equal in Chelsea.A little too much confidence from everybody. Every game in the PL is tough as even Luton have shown. It wont be so easy against United.
United will park the bus in this game, don’t think it’ll be anything like the 7-0, they’ll be going for damage limitation from the off.
Think it’ll be a 2 or 3 goal win at most, with the worst case being we don’t find a way through.
It's wild to me that one of football's biggest clubs plays in a stadium limited to 57k fans.
I have a couple of ideasEven if we attempt to park the bus we won’t be any good at it, this isn’t a Jose team, Liverpool will find space everywhere and expose all our weaknesses, I expect us to only have about 25% possession for the whole game.
Is that low? Once the Anfield Rd end is done our capacity will be 61K which just below West Hams 62 and Spurs 62 and behind Uniteds 75k at Old Trafford which is a shithole.It's wild to me that one of football's biggest clubs plays in a stadium limited to 57k fans.
You can say it, it's not taboo.Is that low? Once the Anfield Rd end is done our capacity will be 61K which just below West Hams 62 and Spurs 62 and behind Uniteds 75k at Old Trafford which is a shithole.
West Ham only have that big a stadium too cos they moved into the olympic stadium.
You can say it, it's not taboo.
West Ham are squatters.
Why are they squatters?You can say it, it's not taboo.
West Ham are squatters.
Why are they squatters?
Ah, so lame bantz then.Sweetheart lease deal for London Stadium post London 2012. One downside is that it can't be permanently converted to football configuration as it is London's track & field venue. And West Ham seem happy to keep it that way instead of buying it.
Ah, so lame bantz then.
Not completely, West Ham are exploring options to buy it.Sweetheart lease deal for London Stadium post London 2012. One downside is that it can't be permanently converted to football configuration as it is London's track & field venue. And West Ham seem happy to keep it that way instead of buying it.
It's wild to me that one of football's biggest clubs plays in a stadium limited to 57k fans.
Then you have the Nou Camp which for all its worth saying it holds 20k more, a lot of the seats have awful views of the pitch and the atmosphere is hardly on par with the quality of football on the pitchYou need a rectangular stadium for football. West Ham might get 60k crowds but have struggled to create a good atmosphere in an oval stadium where the fans are a long distance from the players.
Then it's a compromise between fans being close to the action and those in the stands not being too far away to be involved. Plus the financials of building a larger stadium. Tottenham and Arsenal have built new stadiums catering for 60k fans. City and Everton more like 50k.