Fevola Trade Thread (Part 2)

[Kramer1]

No doubt, during their taking years

Your intent here is pretty obvious. Pretty well anything could be put to you in your response to your post above, and you would find a way to spin it into a negative. Dime a dozen poster.

You can't go much harder than putting a player up for trade. Carlton are on record saying they will trade if a fair deal can be found, and have gone as far as suggesting we cover part of his salary. If anything imposing a suspension would have zero net effect as it is a measure that has been taken before...we had to go a step further.

 

[The Panther]

Fev staying at Carlton is the best result. Whilst he is there, the club, it's team & poor culture aint going anywhere.

 

[bodazoka]

I also believe that this is a red herring, however Carlton will gain much respect in my eyes if they actually go through with the trade. My gut feeling is 100% towards them not trading him and just throwing this up in an attempt to look like there doing something about it and getting away with not suspending him for games.

The problem with this though is IMO they will not have any choice but to de-list him for free if he does stuff up again. There is really no other punishment left...

 

[The Panther]

The problem with this though is IMO they will not have any choice but to de-list him for free if he does stuff up again.

Carlton would never sack Fev, they don't have the backbone to.

 

[Tedeski]

I've got a hunch that should the Swans get the Jolly deal done, then Fev will become a Swan.

The 'bums on seats' factor will play a huge part in us securing him.

Pick 14 for Jolly from the Pies won't do it.
Pick 9 from the Hawks might but we will have to throw in pick 22 as well!

Let's see what unfolds!

 

[douls]

No doubt, during their taking years

taking years? what does that mean? do we have to give them back? Spud

 

[douls]

Carlton would never sack Fev, they don't have the backbone to.

why would we sack him? Some of you blokes talk utter shit on here.

 

[favourites]

theres no ****ing bluff here... for the right price, fev will be gone by friday.

The problem is Carlton has completely over-rated his trade value and will therefore never trade him... so hense it must be a bluff.

 

[roostersgal4eva]

Re: Port move the most likely for Fev

So in other words, he said please don't send me to a club where I'll be accountable for my actions.

that reminds me dermie made a good point - none of the players @ carlton could have the kahunas or the standing(no the best word but its all I can come up with) to grab him by the scruff of the neck and say 'thats it, youve had enough lets go somewhere else' he needs strong team mates (physically and respect wise) around him - Browny could be the few to do that

 

[Zeke]

Fev is worth more to Carlton than he is to any other side.

 

[The Sloane Ranger]

This. And may Fev long poison the CFC. The big Fevanator and the spineless CFC footy department deserve each other.

not to mention, Carlton finally made finals after years of being MIA

No Fev in 2010 = No Finals for Carlton

who is going to kick their goals, Cloke, I don't think so, some will say Kruzer, he is a ruckman that can push forward however he is not KP forward

the only way I can see Fev moving is to Brisbane for the Lions first pick and Bradshaw, but this would be remote

 

[incog43]

I've got a hunch that should the Swans get the Jolly deal done, then Fev will become a Swan.

The 'bums on seats' factor will play a huge part in us securing him.

Pick 14 for Jolly from the Pies won't do it.
Pick 9 from the Hawks might but we will have to throw in pick 22 as well!

Let's see what unfolds!

what he said

 

[favourites]

Maxy made a good point on SEN just then. Exactly what everyone is thinking.

If Carlton are serious about moving Fev on they will take unders. They are the ones moving him on. They don't get to take overs for what he is worth, otherwise it points to a bluff from Carlton.

 

[jord_57]

Should go
Swans trade Jolly to collingwood
Collingwood trade pick 14 and a backman (maybe a Goldsack or Cox) to Carlton
Carlton trade Fev to Sydney

 

[BLue_Bloys]

Should go
Swans trade Jolly to collingwood
Collingwood trade pick 14 and a backman (maybe a Goldsack or Cox) to Carlton
Carlton trade Fev to Sydney

Sydney not giving enough.

Collingwood giving too much.

Won't happen.

 

[alfo]

a new rumor going is Fev to Dogs, Lake to Blues, reason for me saying this is because Lake isn't happy with what he is getting paid at the dogs, and i believe carlton would make the sway straight up.

 

[jord_57]

Sydney not giving enough.

Collingwood giving too much.

Won't happen.

well i dno how a trade will be made between collingwood and sydney then because sydney aren't settling for pick 14 so they will be giving away probably the same if just a straight trade is to work with Jolly

 

[favourites]

How can he go to the dogs who have cap problems?

Paul Roos is a smart man, he knows Carlton wont take a decent offer for Fev.

 

[The Sloane Ranger]

Sydney not giving enough.

Collingwood giving too much.

Won't happen.

Syd may come into play if they get collingwood's first round selection for Jolly

 

[The Sloane Ranger]

a new rumor going is Fev to Dogs, Lake to Blues, reason for me saying this is because Lake isn't happy with what he is getting paid at the dogs, and i believe carlton would make the sway straight up.

what is your source other than Lake has not signed and Fev is up for trade

 

[The Panther]

The reason Lake won't re-sign is the Dog's salary cap is exhausted. They wouldn't have entertained Fev at any point.

 

[The Falcon Strike]

Fev is staying at the blues - it's all a farce by Carlton to send him a message

 

[Kramer1]

Maxy made a good point on SEN just then. Exactly what everyone is thinking.

If Carlton are serious about moving Fev on they will take unders. They are the ones moving him on. They don't get to take overs for what he is worth, otherwise it points to a bluff from Carlton.

Load of bollocks, like most Collingwood input on this matter.

Carlton have been clear in this all along. If a deal can be struck well and good, but no point gifting one of the most talented players in the competition to another club just to prove a point to interested onlookers.

And who decides what is under or over the odds? Not a whole lot for Carlton to gain by coming out and stating we will take shit all in exchange for Fev and happily contribute to his salary as well. The angle some people are taking on this is beyond comprehension.

 

[Wokko]

If Carlton are serious about moving Fev on they will take unders. They are the ones moving him on. They don't get to take overs for what he is worth, otherwise it points to a bluff from Carlton.

We didn't take under the odds for Tarrant who we were moving on for discipline reasons, I wouldn't expect Carlton to either.

 

[Consumed]

Maxy made a good point on SEN just then. Exactly what everyone is thinking.

If Carlton are serious about moving Fev on they will take unders. They are the ones moving him on. They don't get to take overs for what he is worth, otherwise it points to a bluff from Carlton.

Exactly. A lot of smart posters have been saying this from the start.
Just another "go to bed without supper" from carlton to Fevola.

It's embarrassing how many times they have had to do this.

If Fev is playing for Carlton in 2010, they are officially full of shit.
Amidst this saga, their president (Elliot) paying off rape victims and brown bag payments to Fraser Brown, et al, you just have to wonder how much worse things could get down there.