- Apr 26, 2016
- 39,907
- 82,384
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Moderator
- #176
I'd be very comfortable with McInerney in and Stephens coming on as sub.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'd be very comfortable with McInerney in and Stephens coming on as sub.
Yep like we used our sub named Dylan Stephens a few weeks ago and he had 9 touches in a quarter.With the key word being “using our sub” for once
Yep like we used our sub named Dylan Stephens a few weeks ago and he had 9 touches in a quarter.
Jmac is a shoe in to start, and it's not even closeAnd then didn’t against Melbourne great plan that was lol
I agree with you though one of Stephens or JMac as sub with one playing a quarter (sub off the least influential tall with a quarter to go)
I honestly rekn we'll win this in a canter. Blues will win the stoppage can write that down. But what the blues lack is good ball movement and direction going forward, they make it up as they go, backwards, sideways, bombs, bit of this bit of that, hoping for some individual brilliance which does get them over the line sometimes.Sounding like its gonna be a massive slog in the wet.
Should limit McKay and Curnow influence might work in our favor.
Whoever wins is cooked for next week lol.
Jmac is a shoe in to start, and it's not even close
Only jmac is fine, he's x10 the player. Last thing we need is a lost Stephens on the expanses of the G. Stephens has done well coming on with fresh legs in the last.Either one is fine the other one to sub. Take off the worst tall at 3/4 time
Only jmac is fine, he's x10 the player. Last thing we need is a lost Stephens on the expanses of the G. Stephens has done well coming on with fresh legs in the last.
I should rephrase - if Jmac is 100% fit, he plays. On all accounts he is.Really not fussed either way you can make a case for Stephens who actually isn’t coming back from injury. You play guys 85% fit you get burnt we’ve seen this script before look no further than the infamous final. I have no issue starting with JMac but have the runner as the sub not some silly tall or Francis
I should rephrase - if Jmac is 100% fit, he plays. On all accounts he is.
By any chance did you watch us beat Melbourne at the G last yearOnly jmac is fine, he's x10 the player. Last thing we need is a lost Stephens on the expanses of the G. Stephens has done well coming on with fresh legs in the last.
… so he needs to let McL ruck in the 4th & instead surprise everyone by running with the Sherrin (and take a bounce).
Campbell is one that needs to step up also when the heats on
Deer in headlights last week
Would rather him sub and jmac in if was the choice
That was a Stephens who looked to be building something. He's not even close to that level at the momentBy any chance did you watch us beat Melbourne at the G last year
If a match fit Jmac is 10x better than Stephens, an un-match fit Jmac is 9x better.That’s my issue do you trust them there’s fit and then there’s match fit. I don’t see us losing much either way. Both play one as the sub not fussed either way
If a match fit Jmac is 10x better than Stephens, an un-match fit Jmac is 9x better.
They would've put in a hard week on the track, so if he got through that with some run in the legs he will be perfectly match fit. He had 3 weeks off not 3 months.
Not at all sure that Ladhams has the trust of either coaches or players.Prefer Ladhams to Amartey at this point, sub Hickey off in the last
With rain and hail can see amartey being completely uninfluential. I'd prefer to not play him and make sure Clarke keeps his spot.Prefer Ladhams to Amartey at this point, sub Hickey off in the last
With rain and hail can see amartey being completely uninfluential. I'd prefer to not play him and make sure Clarke keeps his spot.