Port will probably play S Lycett and J Finlayson. Does this increase the chances of Fort, or to a lessor extent, Fullarton playing round 1. It is still one of the question marks for me - forward/ruck position.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If Daniher is fit enough and comfortable playing small minutes as the second ruck I’d be happy with that. I actually think he’s been quite a good point of difference in there over the last couple seasons.Port will probably play S Lycett and J Finlayson. Does this increase the chances of Fort, or to a lessor extent, Fullarton playing round 1. It is still one of the question marks for me - forward/ruck position.
Port will probably play S Lycett and J Finlayson. Does this increase the chances of Fort, or to a lessor extent, Fullarton playing round 1. It is still one of the question marks for me - forward/ruck position.
Just for clarificationWith the tactical sub I wouldn’t mind playing Fort and he can relieve minutes in the ruck or forward
Just for clarification
Are you saying Fort plays alongside Oscar in the starting team
Then if that works and we are winning they both stay on.
However, what say they are both playing well but we are losing due to a weakness somewhere else
Also, if Fort plays in the best 22 which forward misses out
Thanks for clarifying but if no forward misses out who is Ford likely to replace in your sideStarting 22. No forward misses out
Thanks for clarifying but if no forward misses out who is Ford likely to replace in your side
Someone has to miss if Fort plays
I know it is early for putting up best 23 but i struggle to find a spot for both Fort & Oscar without looking a bit too tall and slowish
Picking best 23 this year is hard assuming all players are available. Although Adams is looking doubtful
We are very close to the same players. I am leaving Adams (health issues) out of any team for the time being so have PayneGardiner Andrews Starcevich
Rich Payne/Adams Coleman
Bailey Neale JBerry
Rayner Hipwood McCarthy
Cameron Daniher Gunston
McInerney Dunkley McCluggage
Fort, Ashcroft, Robertson, Wilmot/McKenna
Sub: Zorko
I will still maintain that he (and Lester) are perfect subs. They can just fill in so many roles across the team no matter what happensEveryone seems to have given up on Ah Chee. He wasn't doing much wrong till he got knocked out and still has improvement in him . We're now in a position of having around 6 or 7 players who will struggle to get a game but would be regulars at most clubs. So our depth is greatly improved. It's the 5 or 6 who are good players that need to elevate themselves to consistently great players that will determine whether we can take the next step.
Everyone seems to have given up on Ah Chee. He wasn't doing much wrong till he got knocked out and still has improvement in him . We're now in a position of having around 6 or 7 players who will struggle to get a game but would be regulars at most clubs. So our depth is greatly improved. It's the 5 or 6 who are good players that need to elevate themselves to consistently great players that will determine whether we can take the next step.
I agree with KissKiss he is 23rd man in my books, the perfect sub.Everyone seems to have given up on Ah Chee. He wasn't doing much wrong till he got knocked out and still has improvement in him . We're now in a position of having around 6 or 7 players who will struggle to get a game but would be regulars at most clubs. So our depth is greatly improved. It's the 5 or 6 who are good players that need to elevate themselves to consistently great players that will determine whether we can take the next step.
He does things that others in the team can't or won't do that don't register on the stats sheet. On the face of it in the spots he's competing for others do 'more' but having a couple like him in the team helps some of the others.I don't think he gets involved enough on the wing or forward to lock in those roles. As a backmen I'd have him as depth behind Starcevich, Rich, Coleman, McKenna and Wilmott
Callum is versatile as you say and that might now be an issue for him being best 22 in 2023 in an improved sideHe does things that others in the team can't or won't do that don't register on the stats sheet. On the face of it in the spots he's competing for others do 'more' but having a couple like him in the team helps some of the others.
He's handy to have . I've been waiting for him to take the next step because he has a lot of natural skills and versatility but somehow can't get out of the 'spare ' role that seems to be his fate.
Today's AFL article link
Loaded-up Lions hit new off-season heights. Now, about that flag...
Brisbane has had arguably the best off-season of a top-four contender in modern history. Will it translate into silverware?www.afl.com.au
I would have
Payne for Adams (until we actually see him play a game)
Robinson for Answerth
McKenna for Ah Chee
Lyons ?? see how he is travelling come round 1
A good position for the club to be in regarding our player talent pool
................
Brisbane's best 22 for round one, 2023
B: Darcy Gardiner, Harris Andrews, Brandon Starcevich
HB: Daniel Rich, Marcus Adams, Keidean Coleman
C: Noah Answerth, Josh Dunkley, Will Ashcroft
HF: Cam Rayner, Eric Hipwood, Dayne Zorko
FF: Jack Gunston, Joe Daniher, Charlie Cameron
Foll: Oscar McInerney, Lachie Neale, Hugh McCluggage
Int: Cal Ah Chee, Jarrod Berry, Zac Bailey, Linc McCarthy
The unlucky players who could easily force their way in include Lyons, Darcy Wilmot, Deven Robertson, McKenna, Jaxon Prior and Kai Lohmann.
So far Rich has had an un-interupted pre-season. A fit and firing Rich would be an automatic selection in any side in the competition. Gardner is the same.I’m beginning to think some of us might have been looking at it wrong and it isn’t Gardiner at risk but actually Adams due to injury. The fact he hasn’t really been since he went down with concussion has massive red flags waving about whether he might even play in ‘23.
Also, you’d have to think that if Rich has another few games like the back end of this year, he might find himself out of the team.
I just cannot see him playing anything other than lockdown defender. His disposal is not great and we have options on the wing or are much better fits. Love Noah at his bet but I don't think he is the calibre of player you just find a spot for no matter what. I think his best chance is replacing Rich as he is phased out. If our other small backs include Starcevich (mix of defence and attack with slight emphasis on defence) Wilmot (attacking) Coleman (with some fitness hopefully a good mix of attack and defence as i love how he goes back to fill a hole) and I would argue the fourth player should be a real lockdown type, and Answerth can do that. Alternatively Starce goes full lockdown and McKenna is the fourth. Or Ah Chee replaces Answerth.Its a good article from Fish, but I do think that Noah is the easiest person to have missing out on a regular spot in the team.
How does he cement a spot when he is automatically dropped as soon as Gardiner, Adams or Andrews is available?
He is still not 100% and his pre-season is going to be interrupted (already is) at this stage so him starting isn't likely. (in my opinion)It is probably a case of "expect the worst but hope for the best" among fans but I think we should be putting Adams in the "best 22" unless we get told he's not going to be right. He's clearly in our best side and it's not like he has an ACL or something which will rule him out. Our first game is months away - plenty of time for him to come good.
Is this thread the Round 1 team, or our best team for the year?He is still not 100% and his pre-season is going to be interrupted (already is) at this stage so him starting isn't likely. (in my opinion)