List Mgmt. Future Father Son prospects

Remove this Banner Ad

Any chance of of draft year lol
Tried to compile a list based on what ever information I could find. If anyone could fill in the rest of the gaps, feel free to assist.

Jackson Archer (2021) ✅
Darby Scott (2021) :crossmark:
Jai Makepeace (2021/22) :crossmark:
Thomas Longmire (2021/22):crossmark:

Dylan Makepeace (2022) :crossmark:
Cooper Harvey (2022) ✅

Byron Pickett Jnr (2023) :crossmark:
Lucas Rocca (2023) :crossmark:
Billy Longmire (2023) :crossmark:

Ryder Makepeace (2024) :crossmark:
Will Crocker (2024) :crossmark:
Lucas McCartney (2024) :crossmark:
River Stevens (2024)

2025
Zach Fairley (2025)
Kayde Pickett (2025)
Owen Simpson (2025)
Archer Grant (2025)
Kai Schwass (2025)

2026
Sam Harris (2026)
Aiden McCartney (2026)

2027-
Marcus Rocca (2027-2028)
Sasha Demetriou (2027-2028)
Suede Makepeace (2027-2028)
James Rock TBC
Jack Petrie (2028)
Conor Rawlings (2029)
Hudson Harvey (2030)
Thomas Colbert (~2031)
Noah McMahon (2031)
Ryder Hansen (2031)
Lenny Firrito (2031)
Mason Sinclair (2032)
Lachlan Goldstein (2033)
Max Firrito (2034)
Xavier Cunnington (2034)
Sebastian Gibson (2034)
Jude Swallow (2035)
Cohen Thomas (2035)
Sonny Sinclair (2037)
Flynn Thompson (2037)
Carter Carey (2037)
Charlie Goldstein (2039)
Kobe Cunnington (2039)
Laker Hansen (2030+)
[Unknown name] Hansen (2030+)
[Unknown name] Colbert (2032+)


Ineligible
-------------------------------------
Tyler Welsh (2024) - Son of Scott
Tom Cochrane (2024) - Son of Stuart
Dusty Giester (2024) - Son of Paul
Jagger Mooney (2025) - Son of Cameron
Dougie Cochrane (2026) - Son of Stuart
Kody Lecras (2026) - Son of Brent
Ethan Abraham - Son of Winnie
Gary Abraham - Son of Winnie
[Unknown name] Abraham - Son of Winnie
Elijah Anderson (2030) - Son of Jed
Jasiah Anderson (2031) - Son of Jed
Archer Harvey (2025) - Son of Shane
Jett Harvey (2028) - Son of Shane
Slater Harvey (2031) - Son of Shane
Louis Thompson (2021) - Son of Nathan
Benjamin Thompson (2023) - Son of Nathan
Jude Dal Santo (2033)
Hendrix Daw (2037)
Isaiah Hall (2038)
Riley Polec (2038)
 
Last edited:
Look we are just grateful for the Swans academy otherwise kids like Nick would have been lost to the game
COMPLETELY DISAGREE, comes from a family that love football, lucky enough to have his dads genes, would have moved away to play football if required.....
Sydney having an academy had nothing to do with his love of football.....
 
Almost certainly would have, I don't doubt that, but in the heart of Sydney I am not sure how good he would have become as the Sydney junior leagues are not exactly high quality. There is a reason you can count the amount of players in the AFL who grew up in Sydney on one hand.

absolute garbage.....seriously...... has plenty of family in Melbourne and would of moved to play.....
 
Gees im not struggling that much.

All I did was go to their academy thread and ask a couple of questions, I must admit RUNVS was being ok, sort of reminds me of that Collingwood Trade Draft poster, very similar mindset. I asked a couple of questions about Blakey and I had some Sydney posters just jump on me, someone who is such a dog they know it so go by the name of kelpie and some other mouth breathers that just started carrying on with the usual low brow ‘Norf’ stuff and then their mod banned me before I could even respond.

It was like the teaches pet starting an argument and then dobbing before there’s any chance of retaliation.

thats big footy in a nut shell....sadly...
 

Log in to remove this ad.

COMPLETELY DISAGREE, comes from a family that love football, lucky enough to have his dads genes, would have moved away to play football if required.....
Sydney having an academy had nothing to do with his love of football.....
It was sarcasm. Every North poster in this thread thinks this is BS in Sydney's favour.
 
COMPLETELY DISAGREE, comes from a family that love football, lucky enough to have his dads genes, would have moved away to play football if required.....
Sydney having an academy had nothing to do with his love of football.....

............ my post was drenched in sarcasm. I can't tell if yours is.
 
I have no issue with the academy's but I do when they over rule father sons, thats such a unique part of our game, i cant think of any other sport that has this anywhere even close to AFL.
 
I have no issue with the academy's but I do when they over rule father sons, thats such a unique part of our game, i cant think of any other sport that has this anywhere even close to AFL.

Technically it isn't overruling the father/son rule as they are on equal footing. It just means Blakey has 3 clubs to pick from instead of 2.

I imagine it would be irritating, but Brisbane had rights to Mark Murphy (I think it was Murphy) and he decided he didn't want to go there which sort of sucked for them. Dunkley did not want to go to the Swans either.
 
I imagine it would be irritating, but Brisbane had rights to Mark Murphy (I think it was Murphy) and he decided he didn't want to go there which sort of sucked for them. Dunkley did not want to go to the Swans either.
Murphy politely declined going to Brisbane while prefering to stay in Vic and be the #1 draft pick
Dunkley nominated Sydney prior to his draft. Sydney are the ones who refused to match a bid from the Bulldogs on draft night because it came earlier than they wanted it to.
 
Murphy politely declined going to Brisbane while prefering to stay in Vic and be the #1 draft pick
Dunkley nominated Sydney prior to his draft. Sydney are the ones who refused to match a bid from the Bulldogs on draft night because it came earlier than they wanted it to.

Actually that isn't the reason. Dunkley came to an agreement with the Swans that if he nominates with us then we would only match the bid if a non-Victorian club tried to draft him but that if a Victorian club drafted him we would not match. So basically he wanted to stay in Victoria, but if he had to go to another state then the Swans would have been his prefered option.

So overall the Swans were his 11th choice of clubs, but because the Bulldogs (aka a Victorian club) picked him, the Swans did not match it.
 
Actually that isn't the reason. Dunkley came to an agreement with the Swans that if he nominates with us then we would only match the bid if a non-Victorian club tried to draft him but that if a Victorian club drafted him we would not match. So basically he wanted to stay in Victoria, but if he had to go to another state then the Swans would have been his prefered option.

So overall the Swans were his 11th choice of clubs, but because the Bulldogs (aka a Victorian club) picked him, the Swans did not match it.
Sorry but Sydney wanted him and he wanted Sydney. if Fremantle bid on Dunkley at pick 20 or so like the Dogs did you are saying Sydney would have bid. If what your counter argument was true, isn't that borderline draft tampering? Manipulating the draft so a draftees can stay in his home state.
 
Actually that isn't the reason. Dunkley came to an agreement with the Swans that if he nominates with us then we would only match the bid if a non-Victorian club tried to draft him but that if a Victorian club drafted him we would not match. So basically he wanted to stay in Victoria, but if he had to go to another state then the Swans would have been his prefered option.

So overall the Swans were his 11th choice of clubs, but because the Bulldogs (aka a Victorian club) picked him, the Swans did not match it.
So the Swans were draft tampering?
 
Sorry but Sydney wanted him and he wanted Sydney. if Fremantle bid on Dunkley at pick 20 or so like the Dogs did you are saying Sydney would have bid. If what your counter argument was true, isn't that borderline draft tampering? Manipulating the draft so a draftees can stay in his home state.

Yes, if Fremantle picked Dunkley the Swans would have bid on him. Also it is pretty much draft tampering, but it was the only way the Swans could have gotten Dunkley with his consent. He wanted to play in Victoria, but if he had to go interstate he wanted to play for the Swans.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Yes, if Fremantle picked Dunkley the Swans would have bid on him. Also it is pretty much draft tampering, but it was the only way the Swans could have gotten Dunkley with his consent. He wanted to play in Victoria, but if he had to go interstate he wanted to play for the Swans.
That's rotten. What a shit club.
 
Well it was more Dunkley, but the Swans agreed to it.
Pretty sure Adelaide got penalised for doing the same thing with Tippett but I doubt the AFL would penalise itself, er I mean the Swans.
 
Why would a kid want to play for a POS soulless franchise instead of playing for a heart and soul club that their dad played for?

The AFL is winning. Kelly to GWS, Blakey to Swans, Scott to Brisbane, bloody pickett to port. To hell with it...
 
Well it was more Dunkley, but the Swans agreed to it.
So why haven't you guys been penalised for draft tampering? Sydney either get penalised or it is true that Sydney refused to match a bid for Josh because it came too early for their liking
 
So why haven't you guys been penalised for draft tampering? Sydney either get penalised or it is true that Sydney refused to match a bid for Josh because it came too early for their liking
I'd assume Sydney weren't punished for draft tampering because they didn't do anything that put them at an advantage. They agreed to pass on a kid they wanted unless it suited him.
 
I'd assume Sydney weren't punished for draft tampering because they didn't do anything that put them at an advantage. They agreed to pass on a kid they wanted unless it suited him.
You can't assit in keeping a draftee in the state he nominates just for the fun of it. The draft is meant to be fully open and not tampered with in the slightest way. Josh nominated as a Father Son for Sydney which Sydney hoped he would do and agreed they would take him and if it is true they help him stay in Victoria, that is draft tampering. Both josh and Sydney would be found guilty.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. Future Father Son prospects

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top