thylacine60
Post-Human
- Banned
- #9,901
already a gofundme happening according to the saints board.........
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Yeh good on em..already a gofundme happening according to the saints board.........
Hope the AFL are shamed into contributing, have likely made money from his image and time in the game.already a gofundme happening according to the saints board.........
I'd imagine the excuse would be something along the lines of institutional forgetfulness, something all organisations are both capable of and culpable for.saints showing good accountability from the top listening to their media release - why does it take this article before attempts are made to rectify this sh*t?
Awesome response.I'd imagine the excuse would be something along the lines of institutional forgetfulness, something all organisations are both capable of and culpable for.
Here is the club's statement, for what it's worth:
Club statement: Robert Muir
St Kilda Football Club CEO Matt Finnis has issued the following statement in relation to Robert Muir.www.saints.com.au
Gotta hope every club follows suit. Now would be a good time for them to check in on all their former playersgotta follow through with much more than muir apology and possible reparation/restitution, structures need to be put in place, training, listening, intent, change
I wouldn't go throwing stones unless we know for sure that this did not occur in our own club. It may not have been as bad as Muir's treatment but I'm sure it would have been there in some shape or form. Every club would have skeletons in the closet. You just have to read the story to know that it was different times back then and he copped it at a number of different levels.
Awesome response.
Could not ask for more.
If and when such a story emanates out of the CFC, the response should be the same.
Being nasty though was not confined to only the indigenous people, either. I can vouch for that first hand.
The clubs though should have been a workplace that players felt embraced and safe in and not dismissed so easily for whatever reason.
No doubt we're a lot better at it now.......but just not quite good enough, yet.
There will always be room for improvement. Most working at St Kilda now would not know the story of Robert Muir or even have heard of him apart from the media portrayal of him, so it is great they have come out and responded and hopefully will follow through.
We don't have to look too far back to find our own failures with players addictions, have we improved, are we getting better?
Not sure what the bolded refers to, some people just like to be ricks. (spelt with a silent P)
Exactly why we should be reaching out to check on the mental health of all former players, admittedly a big ask given the turnover of our list in recent times and the cuts to front office staff.I wouldn't go throwing stones unless we know for sure that this did not occur in our own club. It may not have been as bad as Muir's treatment but I'm sure it would have been there in some shape or form. Every club would have skeletons in the closet. You just have to read the story to know that it was different times back then and he copped it at a number of different levels.
AFL as an industry cannot be a spokesperson for social justice issues in society, then ignore their complicitness in trauma caused to their own participants.
True, AFL can still be involved.The only problem with that is the fact the AFL can't be on the ground, across 18 clubs.
The clubs know what they have to do....it's all been laid out bare....therefore they must accept principle responsibility within their workplace.
True, AFL can still be involved.
AFL can simply ask for a certified list of players that have received a welfare check call from each club with a $50k fine for any player listed who is found to not have been contacted. Any player not on the contacted list after a period of say 1 month will need to be followed up within a subsequent set period, or further sanctions will be imposed.
Clubs would understand the optics of apparently not caring enough about past players to feel compelled to act. Doesn't hurt for the AFL to ensure they act with suitable haste.
Would be ideal if clubs did this off their own bat, instead of waiting to be told to do so. The size of the fine is to discourage token or dishonest efforts.They can be and should be.
Jesus, that fine looks hefty but I understand the idea. It's a good idea, if players do indeed want to be contacted.
I just think it makes for a very difficult thing to enforce. Really difficult but clubs should be doing the same on their own accord and for all we know........maybe some are.