No Oppo Supporters General AFL discussion and other club news

Remove this Banner Ad

Dogs supporters would be as frustrated as we were last week with the frees that the umps have both missed for their side and given for the Cats.
Which is strange for them. Since Leigh Montagna's bit on their throws came out, their free kick count has normalised somewhat. The handbaggers however...
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Just been. I’m telling you, Geelong will get sliced up by a GWS or Melbourne, easy.

How’s Close diving his head into a WB player for a high free like he did to Scrim last week.

They remind me of our 2018 era Hawks. Very rarely were we ever convincing in any of our wins apart from a few smashings. We were reliant on too few and I think Geelong has a better spread of talent at least but they do not look like a 4-0 team.
 
Hmm
Perhaps 4 field umpires, 4 boundary umpires and 2 goal umpires is t enough



I don’t think field play should be reviewed but this miss is embarrassing. Exceeded only by the AFL’s attempt to argue as legit the dissent free goal to determine the match’s result.

The miss touch is forgivable. The dissent call is not. The attempt to justify it by the AFL utterly condemning.
 
How would you know which kids will be elite or not though?

You didn’t even know what kind of player Sam Taylor was yesterday.

The stream of posts from you wanting more kids, but then declaring that none of our current ones are going be elite is just a dog chasing its tail.

Sorry I looked up on the net what type of Player type Taylor was and it said intercepting defender that why I asked the question.
 


No the irony is an umpire involved in a Brownlow betting scandal would think Geelong would be glad to see the back of a player abusing umpires. It is literally their entire schtick.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)



No the irony is an umpire involved in a Brownlow betting scandal would think Geelong would be glad to see the back of a player abusing umpires. It is literally their entire schtick.

Geez that's petty from the umpire there.
I'm all for standing up for yourself and not putting up with crap - but he's taken the low road with that comment.
 


No the irony is an umpire involved in a Brownlow betting scandal would think Geelong would be glad to see the back of a player abusing umpires. It is literally their entire schtick.

Best comment...

"Of course someone called Pell would be unhappy with someone complaining about balls being touched"
 
Last edited:
Best comment...

"Of course someone called Pell would be unhappy with someone complaining about balls being touched"

I always say that one should never let a little bigotry get in the way of a good punch line. In a 7-0 decision dismissing the conviction in Pell’s favour, the High Court stated:

…there was… “a significant possibility that an innocent person has been convicted because the evidence did not establish guilt to the requisite standard of proof".

 
I always say that one should never let a little bigotry get in the way of a good punch line. In a 7-0 decision dismissing the conviction in Pell’s favour, the High Court stated:



But then how can there be evidence of a kiddie fiddler several years after the fact(s). Of course there's no evidence.
 
I always say that one should never let a little bigotry get in the way of a good punch line. In a 7-0 decision dismissing the conviction in Pell’s favour, the High Court stated:




He's guilty as sin.

I'm not religious, but I hope to any diety that there is a hell that he is burning in for all eternity.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

No Oppo Supporters General AFL discussion and other club news

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top