Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
We do need class players absolutelyI'm with you completely.
Of all the gems we've gotten later in the draft, I'd argue that only Parfitt is a clear cut blue chip prospect.
I think Henry is an elite third tall prospect and Nakia has limitless potential if he can get his body right.
We need prospects the caliber of B. King or B. Smith IMO.
The biggest reason to take a guy like RCD to me is because if he doesn't fulfil his potential, we basically have a 6'4 GHS.
If Williams doesn't fulfil his potential, we basically have Rhys Stanley again.
Those players could be useful even if they bust to a certain extent IMO.
If Jones, Butters, Clark, Sturt etc don't live up to expectation, they are basically the same as everyone we've delisted or traded out.
And they don't even have the upside of RCD or Williams in the first place.
And we could of traded Kelly for pick 20 & 22....Fox guy has changed his pick to Butters for us overlooking The SA kid.
Ely Smith with the "Cocky" like late call up. Has Wells written all over it. Jones and McHenry just have Wells written all over them as well. Footballers, mid size and true utilities.
With all the phantoms 10-25 seem ridiculously even. We should 100% try and turn 12 into two picks. We are a team that screams out for depth. I still shake my head that we are adding 7 more players post 50. To the stack of long shots we already have. Needed to be much more bold this offseason.
That's not what I meant. That would have been a shocking deal. Our best under 25 kid for picks that will end up 24 and 28.And we could of traded Kelly for pick 20 & 22....
As has been mentioned already, Williams is a polarizing player regardless, ley alone any dreaded mention of using pick 12 on him.I haven't seen much of Williams, but I have noticed that his supporters (who have seen much more of him) on this thread are very staunch. Therefore I'd back you in.
You've gone early Big Carl.Fox guy has changed his pick to Butters for us overlooking The SA kid.
Ely Smith with the "Cocky" like late call up. Has Wells written all over it. Jones and McHenry just have Wells written all over them as well. Footballers, mid size and true utilities.
With all the phantoms 10-25 seem ridiculously even. We should 100% try and turn 12 into two picks. We are a team that screams out for depth. I still shake my head that we are adding 7 more players post 50. To the stack of long shots we already have. Needed to be much more bold this offseason.
I think he's implying that we'll use 12 and next years first to get higher up in this draft. I'd do that too If we got a pick in the 20's back this year as well.
and a second rounder next year.And we could of traded Kelly for pick 20 & 22....
Fox guy has changed his pick to Butters for us overlooking The SA kid.
Ely Smith with the "Cocky" like late call up. Has Wells written all over it. Jones and McHenry just have Wells written all over them as well. Footballers, mid size and true utilities.
With all the phantoms 10-25 seem ridiculously even. We should 100% try and turn 12 into two picks. We are a team that screams out for depth. I still shake my head that we are adding 7 more players post 50. To the stack of long shots we already have. Needed to be much more bold this offseason.
They could land both Stack and Pickett.
Makes perfect sense IMO.
Geelong
12. RCD
36. B.Williams
59. C.Idun
75. O.Brownless
Fremantle
14. Clark/Hill
31. ????
44. S.Stack
45. M.Pickett
Walsh is hardly playing safe, most talented mid we will see for a decade.Not that it has anything to do with us but I just want to say again I can't believe Carlton will take Walsh ahead of Luko or Rankine. They are guaranteed to have access to absolute top end midfield talent for the next draft at least and maybe the one after that. What they almost certainly won't have is access to the most talented tall kid I have ever seen by a mile or the simply the most talented junior a lot of people have ever seen. I just can't understand why you would play it safe and take Walsh. Who knows what the future holds but the two SA kids are just so talented it is ridiculous. Generational not just top end mid talent like Walsh. Seems like a safe play to me and when you are going to get a number of cracks at it I wouldn't play safe ever!
I can see us being very aggressive.
Wouldn't be surprised if we trade 2 future picks - one used to upgrade pick 12 and one used to have a greater presence in this year's 2nd or 3rd rounds.
So that would leave us this year with:
- Upgrade on pick 12
- Pick in 20-30s
- Picks 50 and 51 (which will be mid-late 40s after bidding)
- Brownless
Sounds a lot better
I'm going to make a huge call. I reckon RCD will become a similar player to Dangerfield. I wouldn't be unhappy If Wells calls his name out tomorrow night.Same.
Plus it’s perhaps an even split on what they need more help with - midfield for quality supply or forward goal-scoring power.Walsh is hardly playing safe, most talented mid we will see for a decade.
I'm going to make a huge call. I reckon RCD will become a similar player to Dangerfield. I wouldn't be unhappy If Wells calls his name out tomorrow night.
And reach on both?They could land Stack and Pickett with the picks they already have.
Done, but I reckon he'll go to GWS at pick 9.Want to change your choice here???>>>>> https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/your-choice-for-who-our-first-pick-will-be.1208407/
Walsh is hardly playing safe, most talented mid we will see for a decade.
So you reckon much of Walsh’s cachet is media hype?Geez that seems strange seeing as the most well known pundit we know Knightmare doesn't even think he is the best in this draft. How is it possible for someone who watches so much footy to get it so wrong if you are to be believed!! If he was as talented as you suggest there would be no debate at all!