Sire of Claude
Club Legend
- Mar 18, 2021
- 1,355
- 2,969
- AFL Club
- Geelong
What do people think of the Tassie kid with the mullet, Lachie Cowan?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
same-, game v Demons. Will never forget the vision of Buddha trying to help out, until medicos arrived.I was at the G when Snell copped a dreadful injury. He was a good player - kicked 5 goals in the last quarter once.
Good player. I know Geelong have spoken to him.What do people think of the Tassie kid with the mullet, Lachie Cowan?
I wasn't too far away from it. I heard the snap.I was at the G when Snell copped a dreadful injury. He was a good player - kicked 5 goals in the last quarter once.
possibly true, and Cockatoo, Linc McCarthy, but the first 4 were super talents.I would add Vardy to that list - I suspect we never saw the best of him. At least he won a flag and was important in that last stanza.
Good player. I know Geelong have spoken to him.
We won't select him though.
Add Matty Egan to that list tooSnell, Stoneham, Lynch, Menzel..great examples of WHAT IF players..if only they weren't injured, what would we have had...?
Trading out for a future pick isn't realistic to me. Pick 7 this year might get us the Swans future first. Doubt anyone outside the top 4 would play. Pick 7 this year would be seen as a teens pick next year. Just take the best kid left this year.
Yet Sydney have been openly saying they want a top 7 pick. If the player we wanted was gone then I’d happily do some small trades to get draft capital back year when we actually really NEED it.
7 for 8 and F27 - WCE
8 - 14 and FF1st - Sydney
Gives us pick 14 this year and two teens picks + 27 next year to try and replace Touhy, ISmith, Ceglar, Rohan and probably Hawkins.
We only need to be taking one pick this year.
It wasn’t a literal statement. It’s replacing their list spot with higher end talent so you have a pipeline. You’d like to think there are more advanced players taking those roles - Willis, Conway, Henry, Bruhn, Knevitt etc etc.We're not going to replace any of those players with 2023 draftees. If we wanted to replace them, we would have drafted their replacements 2-3 years ago.
Theres no chance sides are throwing in a future 1st for a 5 or 6 pick upgrade, lot of dream land trades being mooted of late.
If we don't want to use the pick because there is no one we really like left I think it is fantasy land stuff that someone would trade 2 x R1s for the pick
Incorrect.If we don't want to use the pick because there is no one we really like left I think it is fantasy land stuff that someone would trade 2 x R1s for the pick
We'd be getting a Future 1st and 14 or 17 from the Swans for Pick 7 - not just a Future 1st alone, in that scenario. Don't think it'll happen, but if Humphrey was still there, then they very well may offer us that to pick him up - as they're very very keen.
Just spitballing here, but If our target was off the board, and we didn't want to reach for a player we liked (Cowan, Hotton etc) I could see us doing it. Probably take the chance of the Swans sliding next year with a demoralised group, it's happened virtually every time so far after a GF flogging.
A lot would freak out and I can understand why, but we have to remember someone like Phillipou, Ginbey etc may be seen as the 9th best player in the media, but they could be lower on Wells/Mackie's board. We could have a player like Hotton as the 5th best player in the draft per say, and see an opportunity to still get our target without reaching and getting an extra pick to boot.
We often forget that clubs draft boards are almost completely different to media consensus after the top 3 or so picks.
It really depends who is out there and how bad another team wants him. Might not harken but I don't think it's inconceivableIf we don't want to use the pick because there is no one we really like left I think it is fantasy land stuff that someone would trade 2 x R1s for the pick