News Giants in the Media: Important announcement 13/11/24

Remove this Banner Ad

Hi all,

This is not specifically on topic, but rather than create a specific thread for this, I'll place it here and a reminder in the Forum Rules thread, to gain maximum exposure.

I note that this relates to a practice that has happened on this board, and indeed on most boards within BigFooty, and I have done it, so no-one's pointing fingers specifically at anyone in particular. But please comply so we don;t have problems going forwards.
______________________________________________________________________________________________

NewCorp has expressed concern about whole articles (or close to) being cut and pasted onto this site. News claims it breaches their copyright. Posters here are the publisher of each of their posts, so you (as an individual) might be liable for any breach of copyright where you have copied material from another source.

If referring to material from a source outside of this website, the accepted rule on BigFooty is that users may quote one or two paragraphs only and include a link to the full article.

Mods are being asked to remind posters of this requirement:

5. No illegal content; respect copyright owners
  • Articles from other sites should be limited to a relevant paragraph or two and a link to the source.
Please adhere to the above site rules so that the Mods don't need to involve themselves in your posting.

Further to the above, here is the request that site management has made to Moderators:

Warn Users

There is a new Warning to apply to posts which you believe to contain infringing material - mainly full copies of news articles:

Possible copyright material.

The user will get this message with the Warning:

=============

This post looks like it may contain re-published material from another source:

{url}

You are the publisher of your posts, so copyright holders are within their rights to request the removal of their material, and to take action against you for breach of copyright if you do not.

Please remove any posts which contain, for instance, full articles from news organisations or material which might otherwise breach the copyright of a third party.

You may of course retain small portions of material which you are directly commenting on, and link to the source - just edit the post and take out the excess material, and link to the source if you have not already.

Posting or failing to remove such material could be against our terms of service:

Terms and rules

You must agree to these terms and rules before using the site.
www.bigfooty.com

www.bigfooty.com

Particularly:

You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which:

risks copyright infringement,

The Big Interest Group Terms of Service include this clause:

Terms Of Service | Big Interest Group

15. Copyright and trade mark policies

15.1 It is Big Interest Group’s policy to respond to notices of alleged copyright infringement that comply with applicable international intellectual property law (including, in the United States, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act) and to terminating the accounts of repeat infringers.

So please remember, when using material that may be the copyright of another party, you must:

  • Use only that portion you are directly commenting on. A reasonable guide might be a paragraph or two.
  • Always link to the source.


Thank you for your attention on this matter. Please let me know if you have any questions.
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

How can the AFL legally impose sanctions on players attending a private event based on an anonymous complaint?
The AFL can impose basically any sanctions they want on players. There's very broad allowances for it in the CBA.
 
Imagine being suspended for a Diddy party joke (said in private).
View attachment 2143480
The funniest part is going to be if someone is fined literally because they performed Raygun's routine - "Dude, that's too offensive and over the line!"
 
Turns out the bartender was a Swans supporter.

He was offended that some players came as Swans Grand Final players.

The club tried to explain that no, they didn't - there was just some players who didn't show up.
 
Turns out the bartender was a Swans supporter.

He was offended that some players came as Swans Grand Final players.

The club tried to explain that no, they didn't - there was just some players who didn't show up.
That doesn't make sense, because the post-season event took place before the GF.

It's beyond crazy the AFL is micromanaging like this.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

That doesn't make sense, because the post-season event took place before the GF.

It's beyond crazy the AFL is micromanaging like this.
Your micromanaging of my jokes doesn't make any sense either, but here we are. :mad:
 
That doesn't make sense, because the post-season event took place before the GF.

It's beyond crazy the AFL is micromanaging like this.
Your anger over this, rightful so, is making you miss the joke.
 
I know Bartel has resigned from the board, but maybe the players were just taking his lead. Here he is arriving at a Mad Monday as the schoolgirl with ex-saint & player manager Ricky Nixon just after the scandal about his s*x life was made public.

IMG_0482.jpeg

Oh and speaking of St Kilda - at one of their mad Mondays they ACTUALLY SET A DWARF ON FIRE 🔥

If Leigh Montagna has anything to say about us, in the immortal words of Plow Wallace “I’ll spew up”
 
I know Bartel has resigned from the board, but maybe the players were just taking his lead. Here he is arriving at a Mad Monday as the schoolgirl with ex-saint & player manager Ricky Nixon just after the scandal about his s*x life was made public.

View attachment 2144321

Oh and speaking of St Kilda - at one of their mad Mondays they ACTUALLY SET A DWARF ON FIRE 🔥

If Leigh Montagna has anything to say about us, in the immortal words of Plow Wallace “I’ll spew up”
I'm sure there have been many questionable and regrettable things go on at these type of events in the past, and not-too-distant past.
 
I'm sure there have been many questionable and regrettable things go on at these type of events in the past, and not-too-distant past.
And this wouldn’t be a blemish on a toe nail of most mad Mondays, ever.
 
This is absolutely outrageous. There was a dress-up event, but the club cleared the players of any illegal activity. I fail to see why it’s an issue as it was a PRIVATE party limited only to the players with the public blocked off. Maybe the skits were rude but since when did it became the AFL’s business to police bad jokes/ bad dress sense? F@&$ the AFL


The incident took place at a post-season event with a dress-up theme of “celebrity couples”, and while the Giants’ own probe cleared the players of any illegal activity, the league has come down hard on those involved.

 
This is absolutely outrageous. There was a dress-up event, but the club cleared the players of any illegal activity. I fail to see why it’s an issue as it was a PRIVATE party limited only to the players with the public blocked off. Maybe the skits were rude but since when did it became the AFL’s business to police bad jokes/ bad dress sense? F@&$ the AFL


The incident took place at a post-season event with a dress-up theme of “celebrity couples”, and while the Giants’ own probe cleared the players of any illegal activity, the league has come down hard on those involved.

The Pies now regretting their refusal to come to Sydney for Round zero, 2025?
If the suspensions stand it could advantage the clubs handpicked to play the Giants at the start of the season.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

News Giants in the Media: Important announcement 13/11/24

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top