- Jun 23, 2016
- 16,149
- 15,164
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
That is pretty disappointing.Reid was asked that on Melbourne radio Thursday afternoon and couldn't give an answer. Kept deflecting. It's on the Sen website
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
That is pretty disappointing.Reid was asked that on Melbourne radio Thursday afternoon and couldn't give an answer. Kept deflecting. It's on the Sen website
Why? What if the best offer to Carlton was pick 13 & a player they would rather not have it publicly known was offered up?That is pretty disappointing.
I would have taken 8 to the draft....Bicks this morning did make sense in trying to bundle Lyons and #13 for say pick 8 .......would a pick 8 .... and a 2017 2nd round pick have got Gibbs ?
It really would have left us in a better position with # 8 to get Gibbs or go to the draftI would have taken 8 to the draft....
Fact is Carlton wanted & planned to have Gibbs for another 3 years .......but the old adage is anything & anyone is available for the right price ....and that's generally well over market valueOur list is already in dire straights and losing Gibbs for unders would have been diabolical. If Reid and Roo had the "courage" to offer a better deal (not ridiculously overs) for Gibbs we wouldn't even be having this conversation. Gibbs would have been a Crow early Monday morning and we would have had some time to use those picks from you to find a suitable replacement for Gibbs.
Transparency. So we know they are actually doing their job. Also what does it matter who was offered up? Both parties would have consented.Why? What if the best offer to Carlton was pick 13 & a player they would rather not have it publicly known was offered up?
Yep they did at 1:25pm on the Thursday.They did. They made their final offer and left it. They thought Carlton would come back with something more reasonable because they wouldn't want an unhappy player at the club.
I wouldn't have wanted to play with Carlton either...Man, I wouldn't have wanted to play for us 2 years ago
We actually find out if they are doing their job in hindsight, plenty of supposedly good moves at the time are really poor decisions in hindsight and vise versa. The only people who really know at this point if Reid was poor in trade week are in the list management committee.Transparency. So we know they are actually doing their job. Also what does it matter who was offered up? Both parties would have consented.
The thing about the whole organic growth thing is that it suggests we have a significant emphasis on bringing young players into the team and getting them up to speed. We dont. We persevere woth ordinary senior players and only bring in young blokes almost as a last resort.If you can't see that "organic growth" is a slogan to cover up our trade failings you are very naive.
They wanted quality mids but couldn't achieve it. Ask Roo what he said when the season finished.
That's exactly right, where was our organic growth last year?The thing about the whole organic growth thing is that it suggests we have a significant emphasis on bringing young players into the team and getting them up to speed. We dont. We persevere woth ordinary senior players and only bring in young blokes almost as a last resort.
If the club is serious about organic growth we are going to need to see a dramatic change of direction on Thursday nights.
I look forward to Carlton fans' jealousy over the guy we pick up at 13 for the next decade
That's exactly right, where was our organic growth last year?
Let's see... We lost the best player in the league, most pundits believed we would only win 8-10 games max., but we won 17 games without organic growth? Who was the big players we traded in last year that gave us 17 wins?That's exactly right, where was our organic growth last year?
That's all well and good but the one area that let us down against the big boys was the midfield. Do you disagree or am I talking shit?Let's see... We lost the best player in the league, most pundits believed we would only win 8-10 games max., but we won 17 games without organic growth? Who was the big players we traded in last year that gave us 17 wins?
I like your ardour but, sometimes you do talk shit.(no offense meant)
Oh I agree with that. No argument there. And, if getting Gibbs would have guaranteed a flag next year, I would have offered Carlton Sloane, Tex and both 1st round picks. But, if I remember correctly, even you agrees that 2 1sts would have been too much.That's all well and good but the one area that led us down against the big boys was the midfield. Do you disagree or am I talking shit?
If they hadn't have shat their dacks, they could have done something like we proposed days before the end.Bicks this morning did make sense in trying to bundle Lyons and #13 for say pick 8 .......would a pick 8 .... and a 2017 2nd round pick have got Gibbs ?
Yeah I meant hijack them, get off the drugs with force. What I meant make it attractive enough that they couldn't say no and want to come.
You talk about the risk of losing players, you not what helps retain players? The chance of success. The Geelong and Hawks eras were built on stars taking unders to keep the team together and win flags. I'm sure the Levers and co would substitute a bit of coin to win premierships.
The time frame of the trade period didn't work though did it?
Yeah we are different, we haven't played in a grand final since 1998.
If they hadn't have shat their dacks, they could have done something like we proposed days before the end.
Odds were, as minuscule as they may have been ....that at some stage you were going to be rightIf they hadn't have shat their dacks, they could have done something like we proposed days before the end.
Fact is Geelong has no problems attracting players ......and have you seen Geelong lately, not too flashIf you're an A-grade talent, you have 18 clubs wanting you to come to them, due to the laws of the game, there's not much extra any of them can do to make them more attractive than the other 17. Most of those players have families who they need to consider if they are changing clubs, so at the end of the day the players choose where they want to live, before they choose who they want to play for.
Simply saying "do better" is not a very intelligent thing to say.
Would you move you family interstate to a city you have no affection towards if you can get a job just as good in your home state?
Unless you expect the AFC to turn Adelaide and SA into a state and city that all Australians want to live in, you're just making pointless statements, because there is nothing the AFC can do that 17 other clubs can't do.
That is assumed that Adelaide did not try that or something similar. Unless you believe that they should tell everybody every deal they try and that does not come off. Or does everybody know that everybody at the crows are imbeciles and would not have thought of such things.If they hadn't have shat their dacks, they could have done something like we proposed days before the end.
I reckon Bicks must follow CrowCast on TwitterIf they hadn't have shat their dacks, they could have done something like we proposed days before the end.
Lyons didn't come out until 2 days to go and say he wanted to go to the Suns. I think this is a fair indication of what our club didn't try.That is assumed that Adelaide did not try that or something similar. Unless you believe that they should tell everybody every deal they try and that does not come off. Or does everybody know that everybody at the crows are imbeciles and would not have thought of such things.
On second thought, the latter seams very plausible. At least according to quite a few posters in here.
Still waiting for your odds to come throughOdds were, as minuscule as they may have been ....that at some stage you were going to be right