WSYD GWS Just Has To Do Some Trades

[Sydswans0512]

You're not understanding the trade.
GWS would have been given picks 5 and 6
Bulldogs would have got pick 9 plus pick 1 in the mini-draft
Richmond would have got Tyson.

You say it right here pick 9 for Tyson is all you are offering

 

[Sydswans0512]

Couldn't have said it better myself, whoops I already did....

Enjoy your draft picks this year

 

[Sydswans0512]

What did Richmond say to the bulldogs something along the lines of 'can you fix up the rest of our tab?'

 

[theflea]

Pick 9 is not good enough for Tyson would you have given away Martin the year after you drafted him for pick 9?

Again you missed the point. GWS can reject the trade and by all means that's fair. What was not fair was to then complain about all the other clubs wouldn't trade with them.

 

[Sydswans0512]

Again you missed the point. GWS can reject the trade and by all means that's fair. What was not fair was to then complain about all the other clubs wouldn't trade with them.

There is no point to be missed it was not a 3 way trade at all! you and the bulldogs make no contact in this trade therefore not a 3 way trade

 

[theflea]

You have nothing to with the deal after this ninthmond

Name calling.

What a moo.

Build a bridge and get over yourself.

 

[Sydswans0512]

Name calling.

What a moo.

Build a bridge and get over yourself.

If you can't work out that you weren't offering enough you've got rocks in your head!

 

[theflea]

The Mini draft pick was worth 5 & 6 by itself without letting Tyson go

see this is sheedy style trading as that shafts the dogs by a mile.

 

[Sydswans0512]

see this is sheedy style trading as that shafts the dogs by a mile.

The mini draft pick was effectively pick 1 this year so you tell me what it's worth?

 

[theflea]

There is no point to be missed it was not a 3 way trade at all! you and the bulldogs make no contact in this trade therefore not a 3 way trade

I am not aware 1 way or the other, but how can you be so categorical 1 way or the other? Were you in room?

 

[theflea]

If you can't work out that you weren't offering enough you've got rocks in your head!

In what universe has this got to do with being a moo and going as low as shark poop and resorting to name calling?

Debate your point by all means, but stop the other crap.

 

[theflea]

The mini draft pick was effectively pick 1 this year so you tell me what it's worth?

Pick 5 by itself. I would be ropeable if my club paid 2 top picks for 1 player considering you can get 2 players with those picks.

 

[Sydswans0512]

I am not aware 1 way or the other, but how can you be so categorical 1 way or the other? Were you in room?

You Richmond supporters keep saying that the trade wasn't just pick 9 for Tyson but then you come back and say
GWS gain pick 5-6
Richmond gain Tyson
Bulldogs Gain mini draft pick and pick 9

It would have only been an on trading of a pick not a three way trade.
GWS would lose the pick that was used to get Jesse Hogan and a Pick 3 midfielder for picks 5 & 6 that seems really fair

 

[Sydswans0512]

In what universe has this got to do with being a moo and going as low as shark poop and resorting to name calling?

Debate your point by all means, but stop the other crap.

A little hypocritical of you?

 

[Sydswans0512]

You Richmond supporters keep saying that the trade wasn't just pick 9 for Tyson but then you come back and say
GWS gain pick 5-6
Richmond gain Tyson
Bulldogs Gain mini draft pick and pick 9

It would have only been an on trading of a pick not a three way trade.
GWS would lose the pick that was used to get Jesse Hogan and a Pick 3 midfielder for picks 5 & 6 that seems really fair

Melbourne gave up pick 3 & 13 for that mini draft pick and they are stoked with it

 

[theflea]

You Richmond supporters keep saying that the trade wasn't just pick 9 for Tyson but then you come back and say
GWS gain pick 5-6
Richmond gain Tyson
Bulldogs Gain mini draft pick and pick 9

It would have only been an on trading of a pick not a three way trade.
GWS would lose the pick that was used to get Jesse Hogan and a Pick 3 midfielder for picks 5 & 6 that seems really fair

You didn't answer the question. How do you know the bulldogs and Richmond had no contact about a 3 way deal?

 

[theflea]

A little hypocritical of you?

So you agree name calling is not right?

 

[Sydswans0512]

You didn't answer the question. How do you know the bulldogs and Richmond had no contact about a 3 way deal?

Kevin told me
I still can't get over your complaining cause you didn't get Tyson for pick 9
Richmond supporters keep bragging that they are glad it didn't happen cause they got Vlastuin WTF has he done?
What I meant by no contact was that GWS just on traded a pick I didn't mean talking

 

[lmach]

If you can't work out that you weren't offering enough you've got rocks in your head!

Your not understanding!

Someone who can't grasp the difference between you're and your has rocks in their head.

 

[Sydswans0512]

Someone who can't grasp the difference between you're and your has rocks in their head.

Thanks for that enjoy your September Holiday

 

[theflea]

Kevin told me
I still can't get over your complaining cause you didn't get Tyson for pick 9
Richmond supporters keep bragging that they are glad it didn't happen cause they got Vlastuin WTF has he done?
What I meant by no contact was that GWS just on traded a pick I didn't mean talking

Show me where I was complaining about not getting Tyson. Couldn't give a rats. All I meant was I think the giants were disingenuous when saying no clubs would trade with them. As for the no contact part i'm not sure what your saying. If the deal had gone thru then the 3rd party would have been involved(re contact, I think that's what you meant) but since it didnt go thru, then the whole deal was moot so 'obviously' any deal was moot including any deal with Tyson or pick 9.

 

[lmach]

Thanks for that enjoy your September Holiday

Cheers, enjoy school holidays.

 

[Sydswans0512]

Show me where I was complaining about not getting Tyson. Couldn't give a rats. All I meant was I think the giants were disingenuous when saying no clubs would trade with them. As for the no contact part i'm not sure what your saying. If the deal had gone thru then the 3rd party would have been involved(re contact, I think that's what you meant) but since it didnt go thru, then the whole deal was moot so 'obviously' any deal was moot including any deal with Tyson or pick 9.

It all started with a Richmond supporter complaining about GWS not willing to trade and you offered them up crap. They also complained about GWS threatening them about offering Cotchin a bucketload of cash if they went after Tyson yet Richmond tried to backdoor them with Tyson

 

[MarkCatsFan]

Gold Coast have shown this year that the difference between 2nd and 3rd year bodies is massive. Would expect GWS to perform pretty well next year.

People need to stop being impatient and remember back to the 'shambolic, disastrous 2012' of the Gold Coast Suns.

And also Brisbane proved how dangerous going all out for trades can be, they set their list back by a good 2 years doing it.

 

[theflea]

It all started with a Richmond supporter complaining about GWS not willing to trade and you offered them up crap. They also complained about GWS threatening them about offering Cotchin a bucketload of cash if they went after Tyson yet Richmond tried to backdoor them with Tyson

We didn't offer them up crap, it might have been no quite level but wording it crap is wrong imo. If we offered pick 50 then you could argue 'crap'.

being that as it may, I never stated or complained about the deal as they can do whatever they like but I did have a problem with asserting that the other clubs wouldn't deal with them, and its been stated quite extensively that they were willing to deal but the giants wanted the earth for those picks and in the end had to settle with pick 2. As I said gws had every right to reject any deal but I thought, and a lot of other clubs did too, they wern't exactly truthful when saying no clubs would trade with them.