- May 28, 2013
- 25,987
- 28,276
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Seattle Seahawks
And most of what you get for Reid will end up at the Swans - if Warner decides to join the Eagles.He's right, they don't, if he requested a trade next year.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And most of what you get for Reid will end up at the Swans - if Warner decides to join the Eagles.He's right, they don't, if he requested a trade next year.
I think you're taking a bet on where they end up, + having to wait another 2 years to potentially move those picks, whilst rebuilding, isn't appealing whatsoever.They have 4 1st round picks - the same as Richmond and 4 2nd round picks - the same as richmond.
You think that is not enough draft capital - 4 1st and 4 2nd round picks?
Nope. Swans ain't getting 2x top 5 picks for Warner, lol.And most of what you get for Reid will end up at the Swans - if Warner decides to join the Eagles.
Comparing Susan Boyle (Richmond) to Jennifer Connelly is nasty work.....And we'd still be more appealing than Essendon...
Nope. Swans ain't getting 2x top 5 picks for Warner, lol.
You must have missed the baker trade. Warner is a star.
Strange take. The Baker trade was not even close to that.You must have missed the baker trade. Warner is a star.
Where did I post they are the same price?? Maybe try and comprehend a post before giggling at in a corner.And?
WCE got backed into a corner by Hawthorn trading out pick 14.
Ultimately, it somehow ended up much better for us overall than trading pick 14 for Barrass anyway, which was Hawthorn's original offer.
WCE wouldn't say, trade Reid, then give up the same picks for Chad Warner, lmfao.
If we get 2x top 5 picks, in a hypothetical trade with Richmond, they aren't going to Sydney.Where did I post they are the same price?? Maybe try and comprehend a post before giggling at in a corner.
If you get 3 1st rounds for HR - 2 would end up at the Swans for Warner. So yeah you would lose most of the HR trade to the Swans if Warner picked the Eagles.
Just in case - 2 or 3 makes it the majority or picks.
Yeah so one of them plus more. So the third time - most of the HR trade will go to the Swans. It’s ok you will still have something left over.If we get 2x top 5 picks, in a hypothetical trade with Richmond, they aren't going to Sydney.
They'd get the lowest of those/ours and say, Hawks first, depending how high it finishes.
Or if Hawk miss finals, we just ship them that and next year's.
No, it won't.Yeah so one of them plus more. So the third time - most of the HR trade will go to the Swans. It’s ok you will still have something left over.
He also has a lot of work to do to finish in the top 10 in the coaches votes - like Warner just did.
Prestia? Lever? Charlie Cameron? McGovern? Brad Hill? Dawson? Ginnivan? Chol? Caleb Daniel?Why would he go to Richmond?
As we've seen, plenty of examples over the years, players move to teams with likely imminent success, not cellar dwellars for the foreseeable future, no matter how big they are.
West Coast are a wealthier and bigger club than Richmond and have struggled attracting FA's themselves since dropping down (outside of Baker this year).
When all the power is with the player, I think he will simply select a side he thinks he can win flags with.
Prestia? Lever? Charlie Cameron? McGovern? Brad Hill? Dawson? Ginnivan? Chol? Caleb Daniel?
Most went to bottom 3 teams who at the time were not expected to rise up any time soon.What is this list?
Unless I've misunderstood - and that's always a possibility - I reckon most of these are not at all comparable. Many didn't move to 'cellar dwellars'.
Do we draft his entire friendship group?
Most went to bottom 3 teams who at the time were not expected to rise up any time soon.
Does his Mrs still live in vic ?
In that case , I can’t see any other realistic outcome than a 10 year deal at wceYes. She plays for Carlton in the AFLW.
And both her brothers player in Melbourne , is that correct ?