- Feb 12, 2017
- 18,819
- 49,822
- AFL Club
- Geelong
hehehewe can lose one of our best players in Warner
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
hehehewe can lose one of our best players in Warner
5 extremely generic posts on Sydney….and 70 obsessively detailed posts on Geelong…hehehe
Refer to:
Sure, Stengle and Miers have been pretty good, but these aren't the types of players who can drive a team to sustained success. They are role-players.
There is a reason you lost five out of six games as soon as Dangerfield got injured. Your club is heavily dependent on a 34 year old to carry the midfield, and it won't hold up in finals.
Stengle is a small forward. He isn't the one driving the ball forward from the midfield or defence. His role is to kick goals or set them up when the ball goes down there. If Geelong aren't winning contested ball through the middle, his influence is largely diminished. Same goes for Miers who is a distributor, not a ball-winner.
Geelong have three critical dependencies for any prospective success: Cameron, Dangerfield and Stewart. All of them are 30+. If even one of them is injured or underperforming, Geelong almost always lose. It doesn't take a genius to understand how this state of affairs doesn't bode well for a club at all.
Meanwhile with a team like Sydney, we can lose one of our best players in Warner and still produce quality football. We are not critically dependent on a small group of old players.
Dempsey might've actually had a contender join him in the Rising Star race if Humphries played more games this year.the fact that we have 2 of the best 4 21 and under players in the league in Holmes and Dempsey really burns supporters of lesser teams doesn't it? Humphries not far behind either
Should check out said poster in his new Collingwood thread - glorious stuff. I don’t dare flick back through this one….Not since Old Mate Danny on the Rayner thread, have we seen one poster so maniacally obsessed with another team and their players…
Dad's army was out scored in the second half by a team competing for the wooden spoon.Stengle is a small forward. He isn't the one driving the ball forward from the midfield or defence. His role is to kick goals or set them up when the ball goes down there. If Geelong aren't winning contested ball through the middle, his influence is largely diminished. Same goes for Miers who is a distributor, not a ball-winner.
Geelong have three critical dependencies for any prospective success: Cameron, Dangerfield and Stewart. All of them are 30+. If even one of them is injured or underperforming, Geelong almost always lose. It doesn't take a genius to understand how this state of affairs doesn't bode well for a club at all.
Meanwhile with a team like Sydney, we can lose one of our best players in Warner and still produce quality football. We are not critically dependent on a small group of old players.
How’s it all going for you ?Dad's army was out scored in the second half by a team competing for the wooden spoon.
Damn, it makes last night's win even more noteworthy, does it not?Stengle is a small forward. He isn't the one driving the ball forward from the midfield or defence. His role is to kick goals or set them up when the ball goes down there. If Geelong aren't winning contested ball through the middle, his influence is largely diminished. Same goes for Miers who is a distributor, not a ball-winner.
Geelong have three critical dependencies for any prospective success: Cameron, Dangerfield and Stewart. All of them are 30+. If even one of them is injured or underperforming, Geelong almost always lose. It doesn't take a genius to understand how this state of affairs doesn't bode well for a club at all.
Meanwhile with a team like Sydney, we can lose one of our best players in Warner and still produce quality football. We are not critically dependent on a small group of old players.
That was only 30% of max power.
The real question is do you bring in Hawkins (which essentially means you lose the final) or throw the champion aside like a piece of garbage. Let’s see how Geelong treats loyalty.
The real question is do you bring in Hawkins (which essentially means you lose the final) or throw the champion aside like a piece of garbage. Let’s see how Geelong treats loyalty.
I feel awful that Jake98 got suspended after interacting with me.Damn, it makes last night's win even more noteworthy, does it not?
Poor trolling.The real question is do you bring in Hawkins (which essentially means you lose the final) or throw the champion aside like a piece of garbage. Let’s see how Geelong treats loyalty.
Poor trolling.
Scott's under no obligation to play a cooked champion out of loyalty. When he plays Dad's Army in finals, it's because they're still better than the next batch in the VFL.
If their body holds up and form improves, they can work their way in, as Stanley has. Hawkins body didn't hold up and his form prior was poor. Neale has taken the opportunity. You're creating a negative when it's positive, and doing so only reveals how bizarrely anti-Geelong your obsession is. Just give credit every now and again.
Immobile key forwards make terrible subs.Not even as a sub? I just remember Jones with the 2021 flag. Tragic.
Yeah Nathan Jones and Tom Hawkins have had comparable amounts of success.Not even as a sub? I just remember Jones with the 2021 flag. Tragic.
They have become too powerful