News Hawthorn AGM 2022

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
I know a lot here don’t like Jeff, whether your a left wing lunatic or right wing, liberal or labour. But, I reckon we would be shooting our selves in the foot I’d we vote against the board endorsed people. Like Jeff says, Gowers has offered no improvements or point of difference to the current board, who by the way have got Hawthorn in the best position it has ever been. It just seems a political conflict to be honest. The Hawks for change don’t like Jeff and I believe it would be a huge mistake voting these guys in.
You think wanting good governance and transparency is political?

Sent from my SM-F711B using Tapatalk
 

Log in to remove this ad.

97640f9c-111e-4721-8f5d-a4077f68ed00.jpg
55722021-ae0b-4081-a516-89a83f4fdb6e.png
76021f7a-1155-4337-b31d-c57b7766eb24.png
09775652-75c6-4ac2-91df-34988a06e96c.png


Jeff Kennett Peter Nankivell Richie Vandenberg Ian Silk
My bad didn't see the double up. Makes more sense now that Ian Silk's signature is also in the same location as the president.....
 
You drank the Jeff Koolaid, good for you.
Na I just appreciate where the club is at off the field. Never been in a better position. Jeff is polarising, but so what. He has Hawthorns interest at heart at all times. Rather some one like him in charge to stand their ground against all the crap that gets dished around these days. Hope your not one of the morons that say we should park “the family club “ moniker all because of
Unfounded malicious accusations that happened 8 years ago that no one had ever known about. Funny that
 
Na I just appreciate where the club is at off the field. Never been in a better position. Jeff is polarising, but so what. He has Hawthorns interest at heart at all times. Rather some one like him in charge to stand their ground against all the crap that gets dished around these days. Hope your not one of the morons that say we should park “the family club “ moniker all because of
Unfounded malicious accusations that happened 8 years ago that no one had ever known about. Funny that
You drank the Koolaid.

Jeff mouths off at the AFL. Does us no favours.
Jeff mouths off about other clubs. Again, no favours.

Jeff says dumb shit to the Rioli’s. They want nothing to do with us.
Jeff drunk tweets abuse at the state government. Every other club gets funding, but Hawthorn.
Jeff drunk tweets about the other candidates, then uses club channels to circulate propaganda about only his endorsed candidates to be fit for such roles.

Don’t be naive enough to conclude that the board and those involved with it can’t succeed or work towards an even stronger position without following the direction of an out of touch relic like Kennett.

I don’t even mind Nank, but the board clearly needs change.
 
Ok, it's Gowers, Sill, Merlino and Hudson for me.
Maria Lui perhaps next year if she re-nominates.
It’s a hard decision, but I still want Hudson on the board for sure.
 
I'll be going for the full challenger ticket.

I haven't heard a peep from any current board member distancing themselves from Kennett's destructive behaviour, so they've all failed the test I'm afraid.

Sent from my SM-F711B using Tapatalk
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

The discontent I have starts and finishes with JK so with him going I'll be comfortable with whatever the final outcome is. For the record I'll be voting for Gowers, Hudson, Pellizer and Lui.
I was open to Nank until the past few weeks. The whole thing reeks now, certainly with the way JK has behaved, but also the fact no one can rein him and the use of the club banner to seemingly undermine the democratic process. Red flags everywhere.
 
I was open to Nank until the past few weeks. The whole thing reeks now, certainly with the way JK has behaved, but also the fact no one can rein him and the use of the club banner to seemingly undermine the democratic process. Red flags everywhere.
Well put. The current administration thinking the club belongs to them, not the members.

Sent from my SM-F711B using Tapatalk
 


The club reading the room once again with these official branded endorsements. Is this normal?

HawkTalk pod has had all candidates on their airwaves, but they’re clearly not impressed by how the club is handling this.

 
Not sure how many are similar - but every bloody propagandist email to the membership base has only made me more and more inclined to vote for Gowers. The club infrastructure should not be used to spruik for those with the advantage of incumbency and there should be a 'caretaker mode' initiated when there is an open challenge to board positions like this.
 
A question for those more in the know than me. I really don't want to vote for Merlino but I will put my principles aside this one time if that is what it takes to get $15mil from the government. Do people think that we will get the $15m if Merlino is on the board? And, do people think we will still get the $15m if he isn't but Jeff is gone? Because, if it is more just a matter of Jeff being gone then I will vote for other candidates.
 
A question for those more in the know than me. I really don't want to vote for Merlino but I will put my principles aside this one time if that is what it takes to get $15mil from the government. Do people think that we will get the $15m if Merlino is on the board? And, do people think we will still get the $15m if he isn't but Jeff is gone? Because, if it is more just a matter of Jeff being gone then I will vote for other candidates.
In my view JK going is the critical element in getting State Govt funding.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top