News Hawthorn AGM 2022

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Did he say who comes after ‘transition president’ nankivell

For mine that’s the burning issue. I’m not for change for change sake, but they are saying there will be a change in 3 years time.
Seems very strange for a president spruiking 20 premierships by 2050
 
Listening to Merlino on HawkTalk Podcast... i thought he spoke very well and presented an attractive direction for our club to head in.

I thought Jeff was very petty on SEN, using dirty sledges, trying to make the issues political AGAIN, and telling half-truths... he never fails to disappoint

I don't want a 3 year transitional president (Jeff was supposed to be transitional).

I want more of the Ian Dicker style of leadership back at the club.

Therefore I will support Hawks for change candidates.

He’s Bruce Ruston reincarnate. His type are now being dumped right round the world

What the hell were we thinking ?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Most importantly that we get Ed Sill on the board. Ed is a Uniter of people and he will 100% represent the fans. But it’s best that everyone reads up on all the candidates and make you’re own decision.
His twitter post says it all. Celebrating the process and saying he’ll support who gets up no matter what.

Jeff meanwhile is a couple of scotches away from asking Russia to hack Andy Gowers’ emails.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Sorry if you think change is just whingeing. Yes Kennett is finally going but do you really think Nank is not his proxy ??
I do not think it was saying it was whinging.

It was pointed out that there were some key deliverables such as 3 premierships in 10 years and profits year on year and the only club owning it's own facilities but we are all acting as we are Essendon.

I would be happy for the proxy to deliver the same results.
 
I gotta admit I am disappointed that the club is promoting its preferred board so heavily.

Its incredibly biased and should only be acceptable if the opposing candidates have the same access to the members.
Like for like.

How else can we make informed decisions?
 
Voted - Gowers, Sill, Liu, Hudson.

I still have reservations about the present board members allowing Jeff to shoot his mouth off unchecked - but I think Hudson's qualifications are good for the board as is the gender diversity remaining as is - further incremental board regeneration can happen next year and ongoing under the Gowers tenure.
 
Voted - Gowers, Sill, Liu, Hudson.

I still have reservations about the present board members allowing Jeff to shoot his mouth off unchecked - but I think Hudson's qualifications are good for the board as is the gender diversity remaining as is - further incremental board regeneration can happen next year and ongoing under the Gowers tenure.
Exactly the same as my votes 👍
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top