Fagan shouldn’t be eitherlol clarko is never coaching again
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fagan shouldn’t be eitherlol clarko is never coaching again
This statement clearly says alot about you and your intellect.So in summary great job AFL but now we're off to get some dollars.
You are dreaming if you think the abc will give them one red penny. DreamingThe goal of most civil litigation isn't to go to trial though, it's to settle before trial. Ben Roberts-Smith ran into a bunch of people who just said 'nah screw you, we're going to go to court and prove this'. It's possible the ABC just reach a financial settlement to quietly make it all go away.
What sort of alternative universe do you live in?So in summary great job AFL but now we're off to get some dollars.
It’s more notice than the players got when Clarkson and co knocked on their door for a surprise, unsolicited meeting. I really hate when people drop in at my house without noticeHahaha 2 days to reply before an incoming missile destroys your otherwise happy your life.
AFL and the Vic boys club: we would have gotten away with it to if it wasn't for that peskyWADAHuman Rights Commission.
If they get proven to be correct they will rightfully be compensated very well. Whatever happens it's going to be a very long process with no real winners at the end of the day.Not at all, there is no money in this for them. There is potentially a lot of grief for the AFL and Hawthorn, but no big payday for the complainants. It is clearly about them wanting to be heard. Taking away the dash for cash element, makes it even more powerful.
If the court concerned is satisfied that there has been unlawful discrimination by any respondent, the court may make such orders (including a declaration of right) as it thinks fit, including any of the following orders or any order to a similar effect:
- an order declaring that the respondent has committed unlawful discrimination and directing the respondent not to repeat or continue such unlawful discrimination;
- an order requiring a respondent to perform any reasonable act or course of conduct to redress any loss or damage suffered by an applicant;
- an order requiring a respondent to employ or re-employ an applicant;
- an order requiring a respondent to pay to an applicant damages by way of compensation for any loss or damage suffered because of the conduct of the respondent;
- an order requiring a respondent to vary the termination of a contract or agreement to redress any loss or damage suffered by an applicant;
- an order declaring that it would be inappropriate for any further action to be taken in the matter.
It’s called institutionalised racismWhat I don't get is the AFL statement during the week that came across as the most delusional case of obvious denial I think I have ever seen?
The Rioli situation at Hawthorn now being beyond just Kennet now makes a bit more sense. It's not just 1 boofhead who everyone thought was a joke anyway.
SuppositionSo I still wonder if you had nothing to hide - literally, wouldn’t you have had a chat to your accusers?
Hmmm Sterlings racism was well known for decades in the NBA, it was only the audio tapes being leaked to TMZ that got the NBA to take action. Same with Danny Ferry’s firing from Atlanta (leaks to the press forced them to take action).How NBA handles racism: actively kicks someone out no matter what status of (search Donald Sterling)
AFL: Burries the incident and actively helps a club hire the accused
Interesting.The coaches will say they were trying to help the indigenous players get the most out of their football career. The indigenous players will say you caused us immense hurt and pain.
Who's most culpable here? The Hawthorn Football Club for not having adequate support for its indigenous players.
What sort of alternative universe do you live in?
Did any Crow hand in their membership with the Walker scandal? Or with the Camp scandal? Nup. Members nearly always back their own club.A hell of a lot more disastrous for Hawthorn, who knows what they told the AFL. If this was my club I would hand in my membership.
So there’s the usual pattern.This is the guy who was complaining last week about the AFL being "woke" during reconciliation week.
What do you call compensated very well? the average award payment is less than $20k not exactly a cash grab IMHO. And even then they consider the financial loss of the applicant, i can't see how Cyril Rioli will be flying that flag, the others might, and good luck to them that is probably the least they deserve. But do you think $20k is a massive cash grab for what they will endure??If they get proven to be correct they will rightfully be compensated very well. Whatever happens it's going to be a very long process with no real winners at the end of the day.
7.1 Section 46PO(4) of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986 (Cth)
Section 46PO(4) of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986 (Cth) ('HREOC Act') provides:
Maybe you are right, but I wasn't talking about others, I was only speaking for me.Did any Crow hand in their membership with the Walker scandal? Or with the Camp scandal? Nup. Members nearly always back their own club.
He has already come out and stated he was aware of nothing. doesn't mean it didn't happen, just he was unaware.Given his role at our club, I would love to hear Shaun Burgoynes take on all this