That two clubs were shown a letter and neither took a copy is completely unbelievable. It would be the worst approach to managing risks I have ever heard of. It is literally the only evidence they would have to protect themselves in the event of things going south. How can a report into this issue then conclude that the executive on the football department and the football club are not sufficiently at fault to warrant a dismissal. If the CEO of a company was shown a letter from the tax office on a tax ruling and the CEO didn't retain a copy and it turned out the letter was a forgery the CEO would be sacked faster than the press could write the headline 'CEO is an idiot'.http://mobile.news.com.au/sport/afl...s-doping-scandal/story-fnelctok-1226632636028
So whose head is left - it's becoming a farce tbh
They have admitted using a banned drug and while I know that ASADA and/or WADA will dish the final punishments I can't understand why the afl is now not doing its bit