Traded Jack Bowes [Traded to Geelong with #7 for F3]

Remove this Banner Ad

Bowes is about to be 25 and played 5 games this season.

If he turns out to be a spud for us, I'd rather we eat the 1.6mil and he is off the books in 2 seasons rather than still be paying him 400k when he's 29.

You're acting like there are 0 risks in giving him 4yrs/400k.
That may be your preference, but it is undoubtedly easier for Geelong to manage an average $400k salary vs. an $800k salary that would instantly make him your 2nd or 3rd highest paid player and a top 40 player in the league.

His 2022 season was heavily jeopardised by shoulder surgery which robbed him of a pre-season and set him well behind the 8 ball. He's a solid player
 
Easy to have that stance when your club is the one benefitting from it. It's a rort
Not every club will have multiple $1 mil multi years contracts that blow their cap wide open like the pies the last few years where you had to shed some good players…much like the position that the GC have found themselves in

Your jealousy is showing
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Not every club will have multiple $1 mil multi years contracts that blow their cap wide open like the pies the last few years

Your jealousy is showing
Who mentioned Collingwood? I certainly didn't. Another joke of a post by somebody incapable of any rational discussion
 
Suns have just brought in 2 new players. So how bad can their cap really have been?

Pick 7 surely will be better than Long or Berry, too. Why disnt they just smooth out Bowes' salary like Geelong are doing.

Salary dump, please.
We are freeing cap space for Noah and Rowell. We’d rather them, not paying that amount to bowes who played in the twos
 
We are freeing cap space for Noah and Rowell. We’d rather them, not paying that amount to bowes who played in the twos

You are giving his money to Berry and Long and losing pick 7.

If you delayed the big money for Rowell and Anderson by a year there would be a new CBA in place with a bigger salary cap.

GCS is a joke of a club who continually mis-manage.
 
If a club is going to take on a salary dump and receive a top draft pick for their troubles, they should have to wear the salary dump in their TPP. It's a rort that a club should benefit so massively via trade and not have to actually deal with the dump at all.

Its not a rort, its corruption that's is evident to anyone with a brain

lets not kid ourselves, this is a setup
 
So DANGERFIELD was the mastermind behind this? The man can do it all.

patrick-dangerfield-laughing.gif
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

So since Geelong would take him on without the dangled pick 7/8
I think WCE should offer GC pick 2 for picks 5 and 7 (probably picks 6 and 8)
 
Geelong have recruited well enough to give them selves these opportunities, the only two failed recruits have just freed up this money for the next one.

But it’s guys like Close Atkins Miers De Koning Stengle Henry that have made this space for us as well lesser known players performing at great levels are the reason for success and cap space being available at this time. We chased a big name recruit Cameron next in line was probably Huggins Dahlhaus and then Smith for a year or two on nothing huge I imagine, so 2 of our 3 top payed recruits have finished and have probably got rid of 900 k of deals and then our captain has probably added another 500-600 on top of that.
But we are not screaming out for players because of this second tier of players elevation and therefore we can take a risk on a guy with a lot of talent who hasn’t performed to it yet and his salary because of the space we can take on without the desperation of players to spend that money on. The only thing I would of looked at would of been Grundy with Collingwood paying 250-300 a year of his and adding Henry in as a sweetener, because this is our area of weakness for the last 10 years- the ruck.
 
Fair enough if this is accurate.

Nevertheless, I don't agree with the nature of the trade

So why if Geelong has genuine long-term interest in Jack Bowes do GC need to throw them pick 7 just to take him
Probably a question for the Suns.
 
Suns have just brought in 2 new players. So how bad can their cap really have been?

Pick 7 surely will be better than Long or Berry, too. Why disnt they just smooth out Bowes' salary like Geelong are doing.

Salary dump, please.

Pick 7 is better than Long and/or Berry every day of the week.

There is no salary dumping. That is fake news created by the elite overlords.

It was in GCS interest to use pick 7 and not get Long and Berry.

The fraud is a enabler acting as a conduit between AFL HQ and other clubs to enable false trades reflecting distributions to suit the beneficiaries of other agendas
 
wow, the off-season is going to be more entertaining for us Cats then beating you in round 15 (on Foxtel right now if you want to watch).

Well knocking out Vlastuin and getting high fives from Selwood is what some resort , not to mention other game meddling

No need for me to have foxtel when the AFL is not a legitimate competition with proper governance
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Traded Jack Bowes [Traded to Geelong with #7 for F3]

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top