Barrybran
Premium Platinum
- Jun 18, 2016
- 54,714
- 104,075
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Perth Scorchers
Hmmm that's not bad actuallyIf you ****ers got us pick 2 for Graham I'd happily swap it with 4 in the Baker deal. What a rort that would be
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hmmm that's not bad actuallyIf you ****ers got us pick 2 for Graham I'd happily swap it with 4 in the Baker deal. What a rort that would be
Id do the trade version of this
Jack Graham gets 5 years 5 mill (just to be sure)
West Coast Eagles trade pick 26 for Liam Baker, 32 and 42
Richmond get pick 2 and 26 for Liam Baker, 32 and 42. This is equivalent of Pick 4 for Liam Baker
Seems a win for Richmond, Eagles and most importantly Jack Grahams wife
You could be onto something.Id do the trade version of this
Jack Graham gets 5 years 5 mill (just to be sure)
West Coast Eagles trade pick 26 for Liam Baker, 32 and 42
Richmond get pick 2 and 26 for Liam Baker, 32 and 42. This is equivalent of Pick 4 for Liam Baker
Seems a win for Richmond, Eagles and most importantly Jack Grahams wife
Eagles could do the same with North Melbourne too.It also means it pushes the picks back 1 more and those flogs with Academy & FS picks use more points.
We could also for example set it so Liam Baker gets less wages then he agreed on the proviso that Jack Graham and Liam Baker purchase a few Hungry Jacks franchise together upon which Liam Baker buys Jack Graham out of the investment further down the line for 1 dollar, essentially meaning Eagles retain the salary cap we want by Jack Graham forking over 1.5 mill to Liam Baker post career with the discounted sales on the Hungry Jacks franchises
So lets say we offered Liam Baker 4 years 2.8 mill right now. We change this to 4 years 1.6 mill instead.
Jack Graham and Liam Baker purchase a set of Hungry Jacks franchises together for 3 million dollars. A secret secondary contract exists which states that Jack Graham must sell his 50% share to Liam Baker for 1 dollar in 2030. End salaries are
Jack Graham - 5 years 3.5 mill
Liam Baker - 4 years 3.1 mill
Geelong would be proud of me
Those stupid back scratching scenarios could benefit both clubs. Bonus points for forcing the AFL's hand to address free agency compensation.What’s with these stupid ‘back scratching’ scenarios?
That ain’t how it works.
You're a ****ing genius, call Pyke, make it happenWe could also for example set it so Liam Baker gets less wages then he agreed on the proviso that Jack Graham and Liam Baker purchase a few Hungry Jacks franchise together upon which Liam Baker buys Jack Graham out of the investment further down the line for 1 dollar, essentially meaning Eagles retain the salary cap we want by Jack Graham forking over 1.5 mill to Liam Baker post career with the discounted sales on the Hungry Jacks franchises
So lets say we offered Liam Baker 4 years 2.8 mill right now. We change this to 4 years 1.6 mill instead.
Jack Graham and Liam Baker purchase a set of Hungry Jacks franchises together for 3 million dollars. A secret secondary contract exists which states that Jack Graham must sell his 50% share to Liam Baker for 1 dollar in 2030. End salaries are
Jack Graham - 5 years 3.5 mill
Liam Baker - 4 years 3.1 mill
Geelong would be proud of me
Yes, would certainly be the last season you see it if our clubs did this and pulled it off!!Those stupid back scratching scenarios could benefit both clubs. Bonus points for forcing the AFL's hand to address free agency compensation.
Yes, would certainly be the last season you see it if our clubs did this and pulled it off!!
You just know if Eagles did this theyd give Richmond a 3rd rounder as compensation out of spite for the situation too.Would be the last season the AFL could possibly defeand their dodgy curupt system.
It wont happen because even the AFL arent that stupid (dodgy yes, stupid no). And the secret herbs and spices formula always means they get what they want, not what clubs what even with actual precendence.
Or to make it up we could always trade them Kamdyn McIntosh cheaply for pick #23I like it but with one slight change, we redraft baker in the psd and send some flowers and a box of chocolates to mini and Clarke.
I have to apologize to youId do the trade version of this
Jack Graham gets 5 years 5 mill (just to be sure)
West Coast Eagles trade pick 26 for Liam Baker, 32 and 42
Richmond get pick 2 and 26 for Liam Baker, 32 and 42. This is equivalent of Pick 4 for Liam Baker
Seems a win for Richmond, Eagles and most importantly Jack Grahams wife
But Liam only likes KFCWe could also for example set it so Liam Baker gets less wages then he agreed on the proviso that Jack Graham and Liam Baker purchase a few Hungry Jacks franchise together upon which Liam Baker buys Jack Graham out of the investment further down the line for 1 dollar, essentially meaning Eagles retain the salary cap we want by Jack Graham forking over 1.5 mill to Liam Baker post career with the discounted sales on the Hungry Jacks franchises
So lets say we offered Liam Baker 4 years 2.8 mill right now. We change this to 4 years 1.6 mill instead.
Jack Graham and Liam Baker purchase a set of Hungry Jacks franchises together for 3 million dollars. A secret secondary contract exists which states that Jack Graham must sell his 50% share to Liam Baker for 1 dollar in 2030. End salaries are
Jack Graham - 5 years 3.5 mill
Liam Baker - 4 years 3.1 mill
Geelong would be proud of me
If not pick #2Get the feeling the reason this is taking so long is we're working with Richmond to alter his deal to help tigers get better compo for him and get a lesser price on Baker. Definitely not as extreme as the pick 2 compo suggestion but similar all the same.
100% on board with making the AFL look silly here.Those stupid back scratching scenarios could benefit both clubs. Bonus points for forcing the AFL's hand to address free agency compensation.
How? He doesn’t have a contract.100% on board with making the AFL look silly here.
Tigers can pay more of Baker's salary to help the Eagles pay Graham more.
It will be band 4 to band 3 which is a huge differenceIf not pick #2
Band 2 & Band 3 is hardly any difference to Richmond
okay, so no salary considerations in a trade then?How? He doesn’t have a contract.
okay, so no salary considerations in a trade then?
It will be band 4 to band 3 which is a huge difference
If you think Graham on 4 years 2.2 mill is band 3, you are way off base
From what I've heard over the weekend it will be Band 3 so we will get Pick 25
Richmond can not take any salary for Baker as he is uncontractedHow good would the manipulation be if we overpaid on graham's salary, with Richmond taking up some of Baker's salary to offset.
Free agency compensation is a sham and should be made to look as much