- Oct 2, 2022
- 7,037
- 9,446
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
3.52.
"Not a robust enough footballer ... they want a first round pick, but that's a '45 days left of trade period' request, an ambit claim".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Some serious under valuing going on here with Luko
Crows will trade pick #4 for #14 and take Luko
They love him and a ready to go player
The posturing here is just bigfooty flex but list managers will get it done
Easiest trade
What the hell?
Crows give up Keane, 25 AND 42?
Absolutely not.
3.52.
"Not a robust enough footballer ... they want a first round pick, but that's a '45 days left of trade period' request, an ambit claim".
What's the trade?Will be at the Crows in 2025. Don't shoot the messenger.
You haven’t proven a thing apart from your unwillingness to stick to what has actually been reported, you have made statement after statement and been shown to have zero proof when asked to present it, and again in the above statement you state things that are your opinion not fact.
Some examples in just the above comment that are embellished, you don’t know what Luko is getting paid for the next 2 seasons, Dimma doesn’t rate him you say, you don’t know that, you have no insight into Dimmas thinking or motivation, for all any of us know Dimma could be giving his ego a much needed deflation
“Damning comments from Dimma”, you say, like he (Luko) has some things to work on, as do I as his coach as he is a tremendous talent” yeah shocking from Dimma
I don’t expect you to agree with my point of view as I have my own bias but calling someone foolish for having an opposing viewpoint says more about you than me. If you want to insult me feel free to PM me and save the thread readers more of this tantrum, sorry for the length of the reply folks
Luko for pick 4
I love that he refers to him as a VFL player too. Dude's played two VFL games his whole career.Last time you were as certain about what we wouldn't pay it forced you to change user names so you didn't have to criticise the club. Wasn't that long ago, surprised you didn't learn from it.
Yeah, with his best mate RozeeWill be at the Crows in 2025. Don't shoot the messenger.
Rozee to the Crows? Wowee.Yeah, with his best mate Rozee
I don’t think anyone is expecting pick 4 to be involved, as a Suns fan it’s a little confusing as to why we would allow Luko and Rosas to look elsewhere while contracted. As I understand it the cap is fine so maybe Dimma has something else up his sleeve but no one’s talking, a forward line like below is talented but too young IMOCould be a future first involved - but can guarantee pick 4 isn’t - not even for a trade down
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
I said this a week ago and I think he would be a star in your team, surrounded by an experienced list and allowed to use his kicking skills, WowYeah, with his best mate Rozee
Postering.Jon Ralph running with the Suns happy to keep Lukosius if we don't get a first round pick.
Jon Ralph running with the Suns happy to keep Lukosius if we don't get a first round pick.
What would be so dumb about Gold Coast keeping him?Not the dumbest piece of list management GC will have conducted if they held onto him, but it'd be up there..
Coach doesn't want him, lots of cash tied up in him, etcWhat would be so dumb about Gold Coast keeping him?
Ah. Okay, thanks. Although that doesn't make a whole heap of sense. The coach not wanting Lukosius is only being speculated because it appears that he is happy to let Lukosius go. If Gold Coast hold him to his contract, it can only mean that the coach does want him. The cost of his contract will be an equally(ish) big issue for every club - unless Gold Coast have a tight cap, but it doesn't sound like that is an issue - so you could make the same argument that any club trading for him would be "dumb" list management. Personally, I can't see it being an issue for Gold Coast if they decide to keep Lukosius, unless he doesn't want to be there to the extent that it affects his or the sides performance.Coach doesn't want him, lots of cash tied up in him, etc
Ah. Okay, thanks. Although that doesn't make a whole heap of sense. The coach not wanting Lukosius is only being speculated because it appears that he is happy to let Lukosius go. If Gold Coast hold him to his contract, it can only mean that the coach does want him. The cost of his contract will be an equally(ish) big issue for every club - unless Gold Coast have a tight cap, but it doesn't sound like that is an issue - so you could make the same argument that any club trading for him would be "dumb" list management. Personally, I can't see it being an issue for Gold Coast if they decide to keep Lukosius, unless he doesn't want to be there to the extent that it affects his or the sides performance.
I'd hope the crows' perspective is they are also happy to not get Lukosius if it requires a first round pick.Jon Ralph running with the Suns happy to keep Lukosius if we don't get a first round pick.
Nail. Hammer. Head.Future 1st with Adelaide backing themselves to improve significantly in 2025?
I'd hope the crows' perspective is they are also happy to not get Lukosius if it requires a first round pick.