Naughton was extended in October 2023.Well before you extended Naughton on 1.2 a year until 2093.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 1
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Naughton was extended in October 2023.Well before you extended Naughton on 1.2 a year until 2093.
Whatever Carlton is asking for Kennedy
You have no idea.
Naughton signed his contract extension last year
My mistake, I googled his contract and plenty of 2024 articles came up.Naughton was extended in October 2023.
We're happy to keep both. It's player initiated as they aren't playing their preferred position and in Daniel's case, a longer contact.My mistake, I googled his contract and plenty of 2024 articles came up.
I still can't see why the dogs would be shopping Daniel and Macrae if they don't have cap concerns.
I'm also pretty sure Naughton's 1.2 only kicks in next year as he was contracted for 2024 already?
My mistake, I googled his contract and plenty of 2024 articles came up.
I still can't see why the dogs would be shopping Daniel and Macrae if they don't have cap concerns.
I'm also pretty sure Naughton's 1.2 only kicks in next year as he was contracted for 2024 already?
No current season stats available
Not remotely comparable.Sam Power trying to be the new Dodoro. Get a deal done pencil head.
More like St Kilda are target a contracted player pay upSam Power trying to be the new Dodoro. Get a deal done pencil head.
A contracted player who is barely best 22 according to your coach. His value is not exactly very high.More like St Kilda are target a contracted player pay up
So James Peatling should go for nothing then as well?A contracted player who is barely best 22 according to your coach. His value is not exactly very high.
This draft is about paying overs unless you're Port.A contracted player who is barely best 22 according to your coach. His value is not exactly very high.
As much as getting Jack would be extremely useful for us, the fact he hasn’t received a single Brownlow vote in two years of footy suggests that his best footy is well behind him, and at his age, is certainly not likely to return, yet if we pick up his whole contract, we’d be paying him as if we’re getting the 2021 version. And we’d potentially be paying him for 3rd year that we hopefully won’t even need him for.
As such, the most I would be prepared to pay is 45 and 47, or one of those and our future 3rd. Possibly with a 4th of some kind coming back.
Just to put Macrae’s 0 Brownlow vote season in 2023 in perspective (I won’t count this year, as he played mostly forward, off a limited preseason), Brad Crouch received 18 Brownlow votes that year.
Now I’m sure most who don’t barrack for St Kilda didn’t think Crouch was anything special, yet he got 18 Brownlow votes to Macrae’s 0, so we’re not getting a superstar here.
We’re getting someone who used to be bloody good, but who’s now just probably highly serviceable, yet who comes with the price tag of someone who’s much much better than than that.
As such, expecting to get anything like pick 32 for him would he like expecting to get what you’d get for a car that has 100,000kms on it, for an exact same price you’d get for the same car with just 50,000kms on it.
If they want us to pay a premium for a guy who’s on a premium contract, but who’s nowhere near producing premium footy any more, we should just thank them for their time and walk away.
If the Dogs can turn Macrae into Kennedy, they should see that as a win. He will play the same role/roles Jack would, possibly even better, for a much much more appropriate contract.
As much as getting Jack would be extremely useful for us, the fact he hasn’t received a single Brownlow vote in two years of footy suggests that his best footy is well behind him, and at his age, is certainly not likely to return, yet if we pick up his whole contract, we’d be paying him as if we’re getting the 2021 version. And we’d potentially be paying him for 3rd year that we hopefully won’t even need him for.
As such, the most I would be prepared to pay is 45 and 47, or one of those and our future 3rd. Possibly with a 4th of some kind coming back.
Just to put Macrae’s 0 Brownlow vote season in 2023 in perspective (I won’t count this year, as he played mostly forward, off a limited preseason), Brad Crouch received 18 Brownlow votes that year.
Now I’m sure most who don’t barrack for St Kilda didn’t think Crouch was anything special, yet he got 18 Brownlow votes to Macrae’s 0, so we’re not getting a superstar here.
We’re getting someone who used to be bloody good, but who’s now just probably highly serviceable, yet who comes with the price tag of someone who’s much much better than than that.
As such, expecting to get anything like pick 32 for him would he like expecting to get what you’d get for a car that has 100,000kms on it, for an exact same price you’d get for the same car with just 50,000kms on it.
If they want us to pay a premium for a guy who’s on a premium contract, but who’s nowhere near producing premium footy any more, we should just thank them for their time and walk away.
If the Dogs can turn Macrae into Kennedy, they should see that as a win. He will play the same role/roles Jack would, possibly even better, for a much much more appropriate contract.
You don't even play him.More like St Kilda are target a contracted player pay up
Sam Power trying to be the new Dodoro. Get a deal done pencil head.