See my post directly below yours. Our offer is so much better than pick 48 (it's actually 41, anyway) it's not even funny.
No club in their right mind that doesn't have an academy would trade you picks 5 and 63 for picks 41, 23 and 25 in this draft- which is being described by some as the worst/most shallow in 10 years, but pretty standard at the top end (which just tells you how much it must drop off later).
If this draft drops off as much as some are suggesting after the top 20 or so, then you would have to offer up something much, much better than pick 41 (along with picks 23 and 25) to get them to be willing to trade you picks 5 and 63.
Even in a standard/average draft I think picks in the 20's only have about a 50% chance of even playing a single game, or something like that and this is meant to be much more shallow than your standard draft, which reduces those odds.
The story is that Essendon will have their third pick upgraded to West Coast's 2nd pick. That ends up being around 35.
Carlisle + 35 for 5 is a very even trade, perhaps slightly in favour of Saints but still not too bad for us.