Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Given the population overwhelmingly voted to stay with the UK, he has no legal or moral justification to invade and the Brits would easily best them so any sane leader would just talk rather than try anythingThey need messi not milei
This nutter wants falklands too, last time went well
Excellent post overall, I just don't know if the examples you're using in this paragraph are all that valid. You could argue that China did Australia a favour in some ways with the agricultural produce restrictions because it encouraged a diversification away from China as a market. They certainly don't have the dominant position on our economy or the military projection into our territory to make us a Banana Republic. India was a formal colony rather than a Banana Republic. And are those European countries economically dominated by Western multinationals? I suppose it could be argued that the EU is a vehicle for economic domination, but you could also say that the benefits have flowed two ways and it isn't outright exploitation.You could argue that Australia (currently being strong armed by China economically), even India prior to their independence from England are/were Banana Republics and as well as most tiny European countries that rely on the protection of the bigger European powers along with the US.
Yes, fascism uber alles if the Trumpster gets in. World staring to look like the 1930's in Europe. Whose left to be the good guys this time?Him and hollands election is a worry if trump gets up again the world is screwed
If Trump is re-elected next year (and reduced Western support for Ukraine, particularly from US, hands ascendency back to Russia in that conflict), and nutters like this are in control elsewhere - time to roll out the old doomsday clock again, dust it off, set it to a few minutes past midnight, and pack it all in.
And let's face it - for all the technological advances in recent decades, the human race hasn't progressed beyond killing each other, or at the least oppressing minorities, for no real reason. And there was a glimmer of hope there at times too...
Edit: meant to say 'reduced' western support...
Very much like 1930s, world generally oblivious to the threat and worn out from an economic crisis (COVID/GFC); a damaging war (Iraq) creating a lot of resistance to war; significant internal group pushing for appeasemwnt at all costs: Isolationist US allowing hostile action; repeated acts of aggression ignored with threats of don't do that again not being matched with action (Bhutan, India, SCS Islands, Hong Kong, Xuighars, harassment of shipping including sinking civilian fishing vessels) multiple major dictatorships (one of which plans to backstab Russia after using them initially).Yes, fascism uber alles if the Trumpster gets in. World staring to look like the 1930's in Europe. Whose left to be the good guys this time?
But if he is to become prime minister, he will have to convince potential coalition partners he is willing to compromise on long-standing calls to withdraw military support for Ukraine, slash spending on climate goals and scrap constitutionally-protected religious freedoms.
He needs backing from at least two more moderate parties to reach the required majority of 76 seats in the 150-seat parliament to form a right-wing government.
To the people punching the air in ecstasy at Geert Wilders:
Chris Lilley? Absolutely!Is he the latest faux hardnut to make your dick move.
Good post. I think the UK is actually a harbinger of what's to come for many conservative parties who will attain power. People like Boris Johnson campaigned on the promise of "taking back control", which was a dog-whistle to the public on lower immigration, and yet immigration numbers are actually higher now than they were before Brexit, because conservative politicians support money and big business above all else, and big business will not let them reduce immigration because it supports their business model of having more consumers and more competition for wages.Italy elected Meloni, who was described as ‘far right’ and excited a lot of populists. However she has governed as a pro EU moderate who hasn’t cracked down on migrants as much as she said which has upset a lot of right populists.
And the biggest certainty. The Tories in the UK will be obliterated by (now really a centrist) Labour Party in the next 12 months. So you can cherry pick some results to make it seem right populists are surging worldwide, in reality the results are more nuanced.
You're being sarcastic but that is exactly what it does. It may not be the stated aim of socialism but has inevitably been the result every time it is implemented. Please don't make me slap you around with a history book chief.Yeah because socialism generally enriches a small elite at the expense of the poor.
Sure.
The media will have a field ay with Milei, but who really is to blame for his landslide victory?
The Peronists certainly contributed to Argentina's poor economic performance, but I'm not sure the right wing junta did any better, though it dropped tens of thousands of people into the South Atlantic for a bit of swim. The Peronists borrowed many of their economic ideas from Mussolini, sort of putting the national into socialism. I really think your socialism explanation is simplistic and biased through a political lens. Argentina's economic failures have often been compared to Australian success, as both countries shared many features - large, resource rich southern hemisphere countries, colonised by the major European power of the day. Both countries got rich quickly. The countries different trajectories have been of great interest to scholars and one factor seems fundamental, Spanish versus British institutional/cultural DNA. This has become a reasonably common opinion and is expressed in this article:This is what happens when a resources rich nation like Argentina has been almost destroyed by socialist left policies for years. The insanity is not coming from Milei, it was already there and the people have decided enough is enough. The country has the second-largest shale gas and fourth-largest shale oil reserves in the world, as well as abundant solar and wind energy resources. Argentina features the third-largest proven lithium reserves, after Chile and Australia, and is expected to become a leading exporter over the next decade. However, the country has been on its knees for decades. Argentina once stood among the world's 10 richest nations per capita. But since the 1950s, few countries have spent more years in recession. Today, more than four in 10 Argentines live in poverty. Their inflation rate is 143%. No wonder Milei is a little hot under the collar. The media will have a field ay with Milei, but who really is to blame for his landslide victory?
A tired tropeYou're being sarcastic but that is exactly what it does. It may not be the stated aim of socialism but has inevitably been the result every time it is implemented. Please don't make me slap you around with a history book chief.
I'm not seeing a problem here, Argentina is an economic and cultural basket case and is desperately in need of serious reform.