with Lobb, that will be 3.5, maybe 4.no they dont, they can easily re shuffle and play Mcdonald back, Hogan and Weideman forward whilst you continue to kick 3 goals a game
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
with Lobb, that will be 3.5, maybe 4.no they dont, they can easily re shuffle and play Mcdonald back, Hogan and Weideman forward whilst you continue to kick 3 goals a game
Unless we're playing St Kilda when we kick 13no they dont, they can easily re shuffle and play Mcdonald back, Hogan and Weideman forward whilst you continue to kick 3 goals a game
Exaggeration whatFremantle want 8 first rounders.
That's overs, slightly.
We don’t need to get May.
I would be pretty happy with pick 5 & 32 or the pick swap with Adelaide & get 8 & 16 (pretty close on points value)
Then on trade 5 & 11 for Hogan & 46
Or 8 & 11 for Hogan & keep 16
theyre prob in the ball park.
Obv Melb would prefer 5 & 11
I just feel like bell wants a 1st rounder this year & to keep our future first too.
Too much common sense for bigfooty during trade timeThe reality is that Freo can't offer picks they don't have. They also can't trade their future first at the moment because they traded their future 3rd.
Until the Lachie Neale trade gets done, this is all bs. They don't currently own anything that will get it done. Once Freo get those picks for Neale then the real talk will start
Either work in the scheme of things for us, as long as we can get May with one of the picks. If GC only want May for 5 then I'm sure we let you know we need that to be part of the deal.
But if GC would be happy with 8, then 8 and 11 is a win for everyone. We aren't likely keeping the earlier pick so it shouldn't matter to us. Though huge bonus if GC are happy with 11, which I doubt.
You guys get a first
We get May and 11
GC get an early first.
Point values should only matter if you need to use points instead of picks.
Because West Coast will have anything remotely better to work with than what Freo have? But you want more than what Freo had?Looking forward to keeping Hogan, kick us 60 next year, then picking up May the year after and then working with WCE to work out a deal for hogan while freo watch taberner kick 20 goals and finish bottom 4.
Looking forward to keeping Hogan, kick us 60 next year, then picking up May the year after and then working with WCE to work out a deal for hogan while freo watch taberner kick 20 goals and finish bottom 4.
Either work in the scheme of things for us, as long as we can get May with one of the picks. If GC only want May for 5 then I'm sure we let you know we need that to be part of the deal.
But if GC would be happy with 8, then 8 and 11 is a win for everyone. We aren't likely keeping the earlier pick so it shouldn't matter to us. Though huge bonus if GC are happy with 11, which I doubt.
You guys get a first
We get May and 11
GC get an early first.
Point values should only matter if you need to use points instead of picks.
Looking forward to keeping Hogan, kick us 60 next year, then picking up May the year after and then working with WCE to work out a deal for hogan while freo watch taberner kick 20 goals and finish bottom 4.
Brisbane only want to give 5. That's not enough.
I would keep Hogan if I were Melbourne. They already have the kid and he is damn good. Shut down the talks and move on to other targets. I see why Fremantle want him, but realistically they don't have the picks. It would've taken picks 5 and 6. They traded 6 away. I assume Melbourne are only still speaking to them out of goodwill now.
To be fair, Freo can offer 11 and next years first with a future 3rd coming back. It’s definitely not freo’s best offerFinding it pretty funny people have a go at freo for only offering 11 & next year 2nd round for hogan. When that’s all they have to offer right now
Then don’t make the offer if you can’t afford the product, but if you do expect to get laughed at for being a bit of a knobFinding it pretty funny people have a go at freo for only offering 11 & next year 2nd round for hogan. When that’s all they have to offer right now
I would keep Hogan if I were Melbourne. They already have the kid and he is damn good. Shut down the talks and move on to other targets. I see why Fremantle want him, but realistically they don't have the picks. It would've taken picks 5 and 6. They traded 6 away. I assume Melbourne are only still speaking to them out of goodwill now.
Might have to be if you want Hogan (and everyone knows you do) , Neale is going and has threatened to go public (according to TR) not every deal can be a lopsided Freo win like the Weller trade. 5 is not unreasonableBrisbane only want to give 5. That's not enough.
Might have to be if you want Hogan (and everyone knows you do) , Neale is going and has threatened to go public (according to TR) not every deal can be a lopsided Freo win like the Weller trade. 5 is not unreasonable
5 and 24 is not unreasonable, 5 by itself is.Might have to be if you want Hogan (and everyone knows you do) , Neale is going and has threatened to go public (according to TR) not every deal can be a lopsided Freo win like the Weller trade. 5 is not unreasonable
Hang on, you guys want to get rid of Hogan and get May.Then don’t make the offer if you can’t afford the product, but if you do expect to get laughed at for being a bit of a knob
5 and 24 is not unreasonable, 5 by itself is.
So you would prefer Hogan go to WCE next year for something you would imagine is considerably less than what was our first offer just to make a point??? - clever trade strategy you have there danster.Looking forward to keeping Hogan, kick us 60 next year, then picking up May the year after and then working with WCE to work out a deal for hogan while freo watch taberner kick 20 goals and finish bottom 4.
Then don’t make the offer if you can’t afford the product, but if you do expect to get laughed at for being a bit of a knob