Player Watch Jordan De Goey

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
He is a big loss mate. We will need not just Lippa back but a lot of the other guys to go up a gear now.
Probably right on mate. Has Maynard been quiet lately or am I wrong?
So far nothing like what we saw of him last season.
Still confident we will beat the Dees.
We are just about their bogey team lately.
 
My Magpie pride bristles at it, but as a fan of the game it’s a necessary evil. It’s the old school army approach of punishing one to teach the masses.

How are you arguing it as 3? I personally don’t have one. When I look at McAdam getting 3 with O’Halloran not entering the concussion protocols and Stewart getting 4 last year I can’t see a path to 3 myself unfortunately.

I don’t remember suggesting there was anything wrong with it only that we ask a lot of our midfield bulls…

Careless high severe = 3


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Just want to point out the media “Stoking the flames” as they always do when it comes to Collingwood and in particular JDG.

Whinging that Hewett was an “innocent 18 year old kid”. It does not matter that Hewett is 18 or 28, he takes the field same as every other player in the afl. The media don’t need to bring out the violins for Hewett just to build the case against JDG even more

Nice mixed metaphor but I agree with your point.
 
Ironic that old mate drink driver/revenge pr0n Tarryn Thomas is back this week after his wet lettuce leaf treatment minnow privilege of being a north player. Not a whisper in media land today.

The big dog tax we have to pay and the hysteria that accompanies us is ridiculous at times.

It’s a real shame it wasn’t Dom Sheed DeGoey decapitated.
 
Careless high severe = 3


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
I suspect this is as like for like as you’ll ever see.


Highly careless seems to be what they hung him on so for now I’ll stick with 4 and prey we bring the Carlton lawyers in or have you as general counsel.
 
I suspect this is as like for like as you’ll ever see.


Highly careless seems to be what they hung him on so for now I’ll stick with 4 and prey we bring the Carlton lawyers in or have you as general counsel.

The dog act that the Saints player did should’ve been 6.
 
Wasnt idiotic really at all. Careless maybe but the public assassination by the flogs in the media today is piss poor

Yes .............under the current rules he deserves 3 weeks or whatever , but I think we still underestimate how hard it is to totally rid your game of something that was instinctive (and not a suspension) all through juniors and a good part of seniors.
 
Last edited:
I suspect this is as like for like as you’ll ever see.


Highly careless seems to be what they hung him on so for now I’ll stick with 4 and prey we bring the Carlton lawyers in or have you as general counsel.


I'd rate Stewart's as worse as he ran past the ball to a larger degree vs Jordy's being more of a brace for contact , but yeah.........3-4 will be the range.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I suspect this is as like for like as you’ll ever see.


Highly careless seems to be what they hung him on so for now I’ll stick with 4 and prey we bring the Carlton lawyers in or have you as general counsel.
My view is that Stewarts +1 was because he lined up the bump from a fair way out - not looking to do anything else. We'll argue for 3 because Jordy was charging at someone with the ball and turned to bump once the bloke got rid of it - wasn't a premeditated hip and shoulder, like Stewarts was. I think he'll get 3.
 
I suspect this is as like for like as you’ll ever see.


Highly careless seems to be what they hung him on so for now I’ll stick with 4 and prey we bring the Carlton lawyers in or have you as general counsel.
The Stewart hit was ten metres off the ball!
 
We can never cruise through a year without endless injuries or suspensions and often long term ones. Dogs at full strength last night bar Johannesson. Lions full strength the entire year bar one week where Rich missed. Adelaide close to full strength all year. Just one bloody year when we are in the hunt would be lovely. :rolleyes:

I hear they think MCceery could have the dreaded syndesmosis. That can mean weeks out. DeGoey, Sidey and Beau are at the very heart of our success. That is tearing a big hole in our fabric for a possibly extended period.
 
We can never cruise through a year without endless injuries and often long term ones. Dogs at full strength last night bar Johannesson. Lions full strength the entire year bar one week where Rich missed. Adelaide close to full strength all year. Just one bloody year when we are in the hunt would be lovely. :rolleyes:

I hear they think MCceery could have the dreaded syndesmosis. That can mean weeks out. DeGoey, Sidey and Beau are at the very heart of our success. That is tearing a big hole in our fabric for a possibly extended period.
Yet we keep winning. Mighty Fighting Pies.
 
Yet we keep winning. Mighty Fighting Pies.
I know, but you'd love a fair fight. Melbourne are just about full strength too. I note too that the commentators never stop mentioning the Cat's "outs" every week while ours have been out so long nobody even considers them as missing!
 
My point is that it wasn't classified as deliberate so not sure how they can claim this was deliberate.
I don’t think this will be classified as intentional either. The Stewart ban was still classified as careless, but Gleeson and co viewed it as “highly” careless. At the tribunal they’ll bring their own views into it and aren’t defined by the box checking process of the MRO. I’m concerned some on here are viewing it with their Collingwood glasses on, but I’m happy to ride with the consensus of 3. I’ll just be expecting 4.
 
Last edited:
I suspect this is as like for like as you’ll ever see.


Highly careless seems to be what they hung him on so for now I’ll stick with 4 and prey we bring the Carlton lawyers in or have you as general counsel.

That Stewart incident seemed very different to me.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
It all comes back to the grading and whilst I am no expert, recent case history could be used as a reference point.

There has been little or no mention of this head high bump by Melbourne's J Harmes who was given 1 week for his hit on a Carlton player.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top