
Bonz
🤺🤺🤺
Can't forget this Adelaide Crows beauty...
But of course, we are the sooks
In Adelaide's defence they do have different management compared to those days.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 1
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 1
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Can't forget this Adelaide Crows beauty...
But of course, we are the sooks
Massive cleanout from that era. Living in Adelaide, it's the entitled nature of most Crows fans that gets me... I believe that comes from the club itself & how it has represented itself previously.In Adelaide's defence they do have different management compared to those days.
In Adelaide's defence they do have different management compared to those days.
2 top 10 picks.Anyway... Dawson.
At the Crows he is immediately top 10 IMO.
Nice of you to spare us some time off the draft thread , have you hit 500 yet , can see back to back titlesTrying to think of the positives of not having Dawson in the team (and there are very few), I think in Blakey & McInerney we can make our rebounding from defence even more aggressive than it already was, without having to lose the elite kicking inside 50 that Dawson offered up the ground (Braeden & Errol can be a huge part in this.)
I've long held the view that Dawson, for all his talents, was not an attacking player in mindset. He did not have the "get and go" instincts of Blakey, McInerney or even a Rampe and Cunningham. He was more calculated, and though that approach resulted in some great kicks, more often than not when the opportunity for that great kick wasn't there, Dawson's impact was somewhat muted.
I said all of the above as far back as the year 1 BD* and it was not well received at the time, so I thought OK maybe I was wrong and just not seeing Dawson the same as everyone else. But then when he was moved up the ground and Blakey + McInerney (Can we just call them Blakinerney?) took over a lot of our rebounding and it just proved more effective and difficult to stop.
I really am convinced that speed and run & carry is so much harder for opposition teams to set up against than elite precision kicking. The latter requires you only needing to shut down the potential marking targets up the ground; the former requires you to actually shut down the ball carrier himself. That's a lot easier said than done when said ball carrier is Blakinerney choking you with their dust.
*Before Deflection.
Nice of you to spare us some time off the draft thread , have you hit 500 yet , can see back to back titles
I was taking the piss going back to back is something else . We haven't hird from you anywhere else.Still got a long way to go to catch your 14 year winning streak of board's biggest grouch!
I was taking the piss going back to back is something else . We haven't hird from you anywhere else.
Trying to think of the positives of not having Dawson in the team (and there are very few), I think in Blakey & McInerney we can make our rebounding from defence even more aggressive than it already was, without having to lose the elite kicking inside 50 that Dawson offered up the ground (Braeden & Errol can be a huge part in this.)
I've long held the view that Dawson, for all his talents, was not an attacking player in mindset. He did not have the "get and go" instincts of Blakey, McInerney or even a Rampe and Cunningham. He was more calculated, and though that approach resulted in some great kicks, more often than not when the opportunity for that great kick wasn't there, Dawson's impact was somewhat muted.
I said all of the above as far back as the year 1 BD* and it was not well received at the time, so I thought OK maybe I was wrong and just not seeing Dawson the same as everyone else. But then when he was moved up the ground and Blakey + McInerney (Can we just call them Blakinerney?) took over a lot of our rebounding and it just proved more effective and difficult to stop.
I really am convinced that speed and run & carry is so much harder for opposition teams to set up against than elite precision kicking. The latter requires you only needing to shut down the potential marking targets up the ground; the former requires you to actually shut down the ball carrier himself. That's a lot easier said than done when said ball carrier is Blakinerney choking you with their dust.
*Before Deflection.
Moving off the interesting yet irrelevant Tippett saga.
Why do the VIC MEDIA assume "look its not great but 23 will get it done, Crows just wont want to change 4 or offer 2022 1st which is needed for Lucocuious/Rankine". This is from Trade Radio, AFL Exchange and now AFL.com content.
I know it has no bearing on what we actually get, but can someone please say "this GUN on $700k per year is worth top 10 pick and Crows need to make it happen"..... FFS
Like do the Swans just go ohhh ok, forgot about this grand plan, our bad???
I will say it now, rather him have to sh*t himself with Norf nightmares for 5 weeks rather than trade for 23 + 37.....
Rant over.
Because we don't have a secret deal with Dawson that is going to blow up in our face.No, it was back to either GCS or Lions if he wanted to return home but he did a very quick dash for cash to Sydney and wasn't that pick 18 and White so what is wrong with us offering you guys pick 23 and Frampton/Himmelberg and we aren't even offering Dawson 4 years at $1M per year but reportedly 5 years at $600K per year.
I know why your here there is trade talk , can you transfer these one to the other to make sure of back to back .As was I bedders. Nothing else really on in footy atm. Struggling to get invested in the GF. Desperately want Melbourne to win but if the Bulldogs win and I didn't watch it or talk about it, I can pretend it didn't happen. Hope you're well over there!
Dawson is about all money and there is nothing wrong with that, just like Tippett. After all Dawson has taken more money on offer to play at the bottom 4 Crows than Port who are in the top 4.Tippett is all about $$$$$$, he even double his shirt number from 4 to 8 after joining Sydney.
You are aware how sh*t Port Power's record against the top 8 teams is under Hinkley and that they had the easiest draw this year, we even have a better record against the top 4 and had a much harder draw compared to them. It wouldn't surprise me if they drop out of the 8 next year with a harder draw for a team who supposedly finish top 4 after their performance in the PF being overwhelming favourite and then begin the decline with sacking of Hinkley and list turnover.Dawson is about all money and there is nothing wrong with that, just like Tippett. After all Dawson has taken more money on offer to play at the bottom 4 Crows than Port who are in the top 4.
Still got a long way to go to catch your 14 year winning streak of board's biggest grouch!
You are aware how sh*t Port Power's record against the top 8 teams is under Hinkley and that they had the easiest draw this year, we even have a better record against the top 4 and had a much harder draw compared to them. It wouldn't surprise me if they drop out of the 8 next year with a harder draw for a team who supposedly finish top 4 after their performance in the PF being overwhelming favourite and then begin the decline with sacking of Hinkley and list turnover.
It has been reported by Tredrea we offer Dawson slightly overs with 5 years at $600K compared to your bid of 5 years at $500K and Port Power offer the lowest with 4 years at $500K so don't compare Tippett with Dawson and Port Power didn't even drive up Dawson price and make us pay like all of you guys wanted.
* Yes it's both sexist and mysoginistic, still, your point probably stands.Dawson's GF: Hey, Jordan. Your contract is coming up, and your stocks are sky high, wouldn't you love to move back to Adelaide to be closer to family *cough* and my friends *cough*.
Oh, so port came close to a premiership in 2021 and could possibly win the flag with a couple more key pieces, it would be great if they showed interest.
Oh, Adelaide are offering twice as much, and will be a basket case in the foreseeable future. That's fine, at least we'll be rich, besides, who needs success as a professional athlete anyway, when you've got me bae.
December hits. I'm feeling clucky, and i'm ovulating, let's start trying for a baby. Oh, finals take place in 9 months. That's okay, who needs premierships when you've got me bae.
*apologies in advance to anyone who finds this post sexist or mysoginistic.
We don't really have a choice in any case, but we have a habit of turning bad news to our advantage. "when life give you lemons...."Great post!! And I definitely share your views.
Dawson had some great weapons but also some deficiencies (however minor they may be), Blakey and mcinerney also have great weapons, and arguably much more potent and attacking strengths.
It's just a case of the coaching staff using those strengths to build our gameplan around, and I think we can very much cover Dawson's loss.
Would dawson makes better, yes, he offers a special skillset. But can we adjust our game plan with existing players to take advantage of our strengths, absolutely!!
We have the talent, and I back the coaching staff to get the best out of them.
Yeah, AFL boards are impossible to have reasonable conversations on.I have to stop responding to people on the trade board.
Let me clarify.Bedford medal should go to 4th place. In a year or two we'll forget he came 3rd.
We don't really have a choice in any case, but we have a habit of turning bad news to our advantage. "when life give you lemons...."