USA Kamala Harris Concedes. God Help America

[Baldur]

Steven Miller, Joseph Goebbels reincarnate.
View attachment 2153331
Disinformation queens, dangerous men.

Joseph Goebbels reincarnated as a Jewish person.

 

[Blue1980]

I get the feeling that ReidBetweenTheLines and Stokey have a belief that what trump says is hyperbole and / or taken out of context.

Ok, may possibly be, none the less do you really want those waters tested?

The main reason I may seem 'over reacting' to you is that IF trump is true to his word then he wants the US isolated from the rest of the world.

That's really phuqin bad for the liberal democratic alliance IF trump is true to his allusion. Super bad for us.

Yeah I get that Harris low bar and 'left' (subject to opinion of course), but to think (if that's what you're thinking) that Harris is some sort of irrational lefty and will favour minority groups at the detriment of the majority is also hyperbole.

So, do tell us what you really think.

Do you really believe trump is over blowing his rhetoric and do you really believe that harris is an enemy of Jan and Joe public?

They simply don’t care or find some weird false equivalence with the Dems to convince them they are worse.

I criticise the Dems plenty, those guys on the other hand, very obedient to their dear leader, never a word of criticism for the republicans or Trump.

 

[Blue1980]

Joseph Goebbels reincarnated as a Jewish person.

Well Hitler had Jewish ancestry too didn’t he?

As has been pointed out before most of these white supremacist types aren’t very supreme.

 

[Carringbush2010]

They simply don’t care or find some weird false equivalence with the Dems to convince them they are worse.

I criticise the Dems plenty, those guys on the other hand, very obedient to their dear leader, never a word of criticism for the republicans or Trump.

Yeah I get that, and I get that they don't 'endorse' trump, none the less accusing them of endorsing trump when they haven't endorsed just discredits argument.

Not criticizing doesn't equate to an endorsement.

In short, don't give em ammo.

 

[Baldur]

Well Hitler had Jewish ancestry too didn’t he?

As has been pointed out before most of these white supremacist types aren’t very supreme.

Johann Georg Hiedler - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Most likely not.

 

[IlovethePies]

Well Hitler had Jewish ancestry too didn’t he?

As has been pointed out before most of these white supremacist types aren’t very supreme.

"Ancestry". "ethnicity" plays no role in the formulation of political policy.
All that matters is class interests.

That is why Zelensky, who is Jewish, leads a government populated by anti-Semitic fascists.

Both agree that the Ukrainian capitalist class can enrich itself by supporting the NATO war drive against Russia.

That is why German imperialism is happy to back Israel all the while as it commits genocide of the same nature as the Nazis during WW2 against the Jewish population.

That is why Zionist leaders prior to WW2 were happy to collaborate with Hitler if he agreed to deport German Jews to Israel. They agreed with Hitler's racialist hatred. Only they claimed that the Jews were the supreme race, in opposition to Hitler who claimed instead that Aryans were the supreme race.

However, what matters is that both Hitler and the Zionists represented the same class interests: that of a capitalist class which aspired to dominate a land mass and extract profits from the superexploitation of the working class.

That is why Elon Musk, who is a vicious anti-Semite, went to Israel and shook the hand of Netanyahu. Netanyahu is carrying out a genocide on behalf of the US corporate oligarchy, of which Elon Musk is a member.

There are just too many examples to list.

 

[Blue1980]

Yeah I get that, and I get that they don't 'endorse' trump, none the less accusing them of endorsing trump when they haven't endorsed just discredits argument.

Not criticizing doesn't equate to an endorsement.

In short, don't give em ammo.

They have both said they prefer Trump to Kamala, so not sure how that isn’t an endorsement.

 

[GrayRanga]

Well Hitler had Jewish ancestry too didn’t he?

As has been pointed out before most of these white supremacist types aren’t very supreme.

No, a rumour without any proven substance at all

However, he did suffer from right-side cryptorchidism, an un-descended testicle.

So the song was right; he did have only one ball

 

[Blue1980]

No, a rumour without any proven substance at all

However, he did suffer from right-side cryptorchidism, an un-descended testicle.

So the song was right; he did have only one ball

Point being he wasn’t the Aryan ideal he apparently wanted everyone to be.

 

[IlovethePies]

Point being he wasn’t the Aryan ideal he apparently wanted everyone to be.

Who cares?

 

[Blue1980]

Who cares?

I was agreeing with your point that it has nothing to do with political policy.

Shouldn’t you be cheerleading Russia in another thread?

 

[Carringbush2010]

They have both said they prefer Trump to Kamala, so not sure how that isn’t an endorsement.

Preference isn't necessarily an endorsement, it's a preference, not a like.

Just like you've openly claimed your faults of harris.

Is it likely there's a mask and they secretly do like trump? Maybe, but we can only speculate.

Making accusations of 'you like trump', without evidence just discredits argument and gives those you oppose ammunition.

'I haven't endorsed trump, that's just you believing I do'

 

[Blue1980]

Preference isn't necessarily an endorsement, it's a preference, not a like.

Just like you've openly claimed your faults of harris.

Is it likely there's a mask and they secretly do like trump? Maybe, but we can only speculate.

Making accusations of 'you like trump', without evidence just discredits argument and gives those you oppose ammunition.

'I haven't endorsed trump, that's just you believing I do'

You are acting in way better faith than they are.

You can try the go high while they go low, doesn’t get you anywhere.

 

[IlovethePies]

I was agreeing with your point that it has nothing to do with political policy.

Shouldn’t you be cheerleading Russia in another thread?

I'll post wherever I want.

 

[carltonchelsea]

Joseph Goebbels reincarnated as a Jewish person.

He’s word for word, action for action!

 

[Blue1980]

I'll post wherever I want.

Not saying you can’t, you just have to shoehorn your anti Ukraine stuff into everything you post even when it’s totally off topic.

I think you’re just a Russian shill who is trying to side with far leftists, I’ve seen the game before.

You criticise America for everything while giving Russia a free pass.

You can post wherever you like and I will keep calling you a disingenuous douchebag whenever I like as well.

 

[Carringbush2010]

You are acting in way better faith than they are.

You can try the go high while they go low, doesn’t get you anywhere.

Nor does going low accusing those you oppose of what they haven't disclosed.

Discredit them with salient argument, not accusations of what may be.

 

[IlovethePies]

Not saying you can’t, you just have to shoehorn your anti Ukraine stuff into everything you post even when it’s totally off topic.

I think you’re just a Russian shill who is trying to side with far leftists, I’ve seen the game before.

You criticise America for everything while giving Russia a free pass.

You can post wherever you like and I will keep calling you a disingenuous douchebag whenever I like as well.

You can keep doing that as much as you like, but it proves that you understand absolutely nothing about what I post, nor about politics in general.

 

[Present Not Past]

Agree with your characterisation of Trump and Miller.
But you have no answer for the one really important question, which is:

How is it that Trump carried out an attempted coup 4 years ago, aiming to overthrow the US Constitution, yet now is free to campaign across the country, supported by an armada of fascists within the Republican party ?

If history is any guide, political figures who carry out an attempted coup which fails are either: in exile, in prison, or dead.

Yet Trump is now on the verge of becoming the next President, and is openly broadcasting his intentions to overthrow the election result should it not be in his favour.

You are unable to explain this conundrum because you believe that the Democrats are "better" , or "more committed to democracy" than the Republicans.

Imagine if you had a global News Network that told it's viewers how great you were, how much you made it's viewers lives so incredible and how horrible your enemies were.
It would be great right?
That's basically Fox News and Donald Trump.
Also, add in a huge social network platform whose owner is your best friend.
Throw those two into a pot, and watch your political buddies join your jolly group.

 

[Blue1980]

Preference isn't necessarily an endorsement, it's a preference, not a like.

Just like you've openly claimed your faults of harris.

Is it likely there's a mask and they secretly do like trump? Maybe, but we can only speculate.

Making accusations of 'you like trump', without evidence just discredits argument and gives those you oppose ammunition.

'I haven't endorsed trump, that's just you believing I do'

Well when one person only ever criticises one side of politics and never the other, they aren't a serious person and deserve to be called out.

It doesn't give them extra ammo, as we all know their game. Its like those "enlightened centrists" on youtube who only ever criticise the democrats while always giving Trump and the republicans a free pass.

One can argue their points as being wrong (which I do) but then they try and muddy the waters in weird false equivalences that make no sense akin comparing an elephant to a mouse and claiming they are the same size.

Have you seen the many questions which have been asked of these people which are never answered properly?

 

[Blue1980]

You can keep doing that as much as you like, but it proves that you understand absolutely nothing about what I post, nor about politics in general.

To get to this socialist revolution you would like, what do you think the best way of getting there is?

 

[Stokey]

Surely there's a Hitler thread somewhere all this can be posted in.

Can we get back to talking about Kamala.

 

[Blue1980]

Surely there's a Hitler thread somewhere all this can be posted in.

Can we get back to talking about Kamala.

Hey I just mentioned socialism, which you may find relevant to Kamala.

I mean I don't, but you might.

Btw question without notice, how do you think the electoral collage will turn out?

 

[Stokey]

Hey I just mentioned socialism, which you may find relevant to Kamala.

I mean I don't, but you might.

Btw question without notice, how do you think the electoral collage will turn out?

I don't either.

I read somewhere that even though it is neck and neck nationally the probability of the winner getting over 300 is around 60%. That is how I feel. It's most likely to be around the 300-310 range for the winner.

 

[Carringbush2010]

Well when one person only ever criticises one side of politics and never the other, they aren't a serious person and deserve to be called out.

It doesn't give them extra ammo, as we all know their game. Its like those "enlightened centrists" on youtube who only ever criticise the democrats while always giving Trump and the republicans a free pass.

One can argue their points as being wrong (which I do) but then they try and muddy the waters in weird false equivalences that make no sense akin comparing an elephant to a mouse and claiming they are the same size.

Have you seen the many questions which have been asked of these people which are never answered properly?

'Have you seen the many questions which have been asked of these people which are never answered properly?'

This is my point, just because they haven't answered properly does not equate to guilty of trump support.

Is it likely? Yeah of course, but you shouldn't use it as a 'I know you support trump', and claim it as an absolute, use absolute evidence instead.

You're not alone here btw, which is why there is opposition, not coz they don't endorse openly.

What you're doing here is giving them ammunition 'you don't have evidence of me supporting trump', I'll go so far as to say you're biased against their 'support for trump' (which is fine).

The point is you only have speculation (however likely it is)of their support. That immediately discredits argument against them.

Yeah I know it shouldn't but it does.