But for some reason can't separate the two issuesDid listen to Kane and King on SEN, and Kane actually did rip the coaching.
I didn't get the vibe 'Port needs to keep Ken', it's more of he doesn't believe in Carr.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
But for some reason can't separate the two issuesDid listen to Kane and King on SEN, and Kane actually did rip the coaching.
I didn't get the vibe 'Port needs to keep Ken', it's more of he doesn't believe in Carr.
He wasn't human garbage when he ran from Adelaide to Melbourne for charity champ.
Have I got this right? Is Kane Cornes saying Hinkley will go if Port do not make the Grand Final.
Cornes understands that questions over Hinkley’s future will be asked following the Geelong loss and he’s sticking with his thoughts that the Power will have a new head coach in 2025 should they not progress to a Grand Final this September.
That sounds to me like Kornes thinks Ken is gone if we do not win this week against either the Hawks or the Dogs. If that is the case I hope he is not wrong on this one.
Where does Port Adelaide go with Ken Hinkley after humiliating Cats loss? Cornes weighs in
“If there’s another straight sets exit, there’s going to have to be a long external review.”www.sen.com.au
No current season stats available
Man who dislikes Tredrea also runs to defence of Kane Cones.He wasn't human garbage when he ran from Adelaide to Melbourne for charity champ.
He can't bring himself to say though that the main issue is Hinkley. He just says his opinion is that if he doesn't make a GF this year he'll be gone. Kornes has no problems at all saying Bevo is the problem at the Bulldogs. And when he did say something might be wrong with the coaching it's just "Hey look, Josh Carr is a coach there, how is he the answer to the problem?"
Interesting listening though to how the two of them analysed what the problems were. Kornes was its all on the players, the mindset etc. Whereas King is just going full throttle that tactically we were inept. Of course its a combination of the two, but Kornes will simply not criticise Hinkley.
Good callMan who dislikes Tredrea also runs to defence of Kane Cones.
Hmm
Probably hearing his dear brother won’t be at Port next year, so time to get stuck into Ken.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Pretty sure Chad will be at Port next year even if Ken isn't the coach. But I would expect him to be moved out of the forward line and most likely moved into a development coaching role.
Pretty sure Chad will be at Port next year even if Ken isn't the coach. But I would expect him to be moved out of the forward line and most likely moved into a development coaching role.
I hope you’re wrong, we need a complete clean out.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
I don't think that. My mail is none of Kane's premiership team mates talk to him. Chad might even be one of those.He's contracted.
I do laugh when people think Chad is a major problem at Port. The forward line structure and issues have been the same for many years - long before Chad became forwards coach.
And if you think Chad is the primary leaker of info to Kane - he gets his info direct from the source (Ken, CD and Richo).
There are bigger issues with Chad's continued employment than his tactics. He's a shit bloke. I want a restraining order on anybody with the surname Cornes stepping within a kilometre of Alberton ever again.He's contracted.
I do laugh when people think Chad is a major problem at Port. The forward line structure and issues have been the same for many years - long before Chad became forwards coach.
And if you think Chad is the primary leaker of info to Kane - he gets his info direct from the source (Ken, CD and Richo).
He's contracted.
I do laugh when people think Chad is a major problem at Port. The forward line structure and issues have been the same for many years - long before Chad became forwards coach.
And if you think Chad is the primary leaker of info to Kane - he gets his info direct from the source (Ken, CD and Richo).
Same as what I hear. If it wasn’t for the DNA link they wouldn’t have any contact at all and have never been close.I don't think that. My mail is none of Kane's premiership team mates talk to him. Chad might even be one of those.
Woah ok strangely that’s reassuring but hard to believe why else is Kane glued to Kens ass so much if not nepotism ?Same as what I hear. If it wasn’t for the DNA link they wouldn’t have any contact at all and have never been close.
The “protecting his brothers job” narrative on here has always been way off the mark.
I would sack Hinkley now but perhaps Carr is an even worse coach than HinkleyDid listen to Kane and King on SEN, and Kane actually did rip the coaching.
I didn't get the vibe 'Port needs to keep Ken', it's more of he doesn't believe in Carr.
Ken saved the guys football career. He was back in the two’s under Primus and would have been delisted/traded had Matty continued.Woah ok strangely that’s reassuring but hard to believe why else is Kane glued to Kens ass so much if not nepotism ?
Surely a gifted final season to make 300 isn’t worth this level of sycophantic BS
GarbageI don't think that. My mail is none of Kane's premiership team mates talk to him. Chad might even be one of those.
Good to have you here Kane.Garbage
You couldn’t be more wrong
Yes people like Hardwick get annoyed w Kane’s comments but the port boys still remain friends with Kane
Hardwick is in the wrong. Bloke left Richmond in the lurch, came to Gold Coast and they couldn’t even make finals w an easy draw
It'll actually be good for the club when we move past Kane's mates being in charge. You get rid of Chad and Ken and suddenly we may actually get honesty from our very own media shock jock.He can't bring himself to say though that the main issue is Hinkley. He just says his opinion is that if he doesn't make a GF this year he'll be gone. Kornes has no problems at all saying Bevo is the problem at the Bulldogs. And when he did say something might be wrong with the coaching it's just "Hey look, Josh Carr is a coach there, how is he the answer to the problem?"
Interesting listening though to how the two of them analysed what the problems were. Kornes was its all on the players, the mindset etc. Whereas King is just going full throttle that tactically we were inept. Of course its a combination of the two, but Kornes will simply not criticise Hinkley.