When the milk gets delivered it's $2 and its use by date is 12 October. That's all well and good till about the 11th. Then you might worry about it not selling.
Then we keep him?
That's not an option mate.
I have wondered about that but other Melbourne posters have indicated this is a very unlikely outcome.
Not publicly.
If you believe in your first statement then our F1 makes our offer more valuable than those offers because WC would be doubtful to make the 8 next year - therefore you rate us lower and your getting to top 7 pick. Therefore 13 and F1 seems a little high in value no?
Your future pick is just as likely to be 15 as 7, can’t keep saying it is “top 7”. It’s 13 this year and yMoir trajectory is upward.
Do you understand uncontracted means?
Old55 implied it’s top 7 not me - I’m pretty sure it’ll be 18.
Contracted means the club sets the price.
And the market i.e. MFC says pick 13, Freo's future 1st and North's future 2nd.
Sorry mate but at that price there is no demand.
I'd say there is plenty of demand given Freo have offered Jackson north of $800k per year over 5 years.
Only offering him what melb and wce offered him
You are not very good at this whole negotiating thing are you. There is one buyer in the market, therefore, buyer holds all the power. We don't have to give in to Melbourne's outrageous asking price similarly to like Carlton not meeting our asking price for Cerra. The Freo price is fair. Your club is the one who took the risk on an interstate boy ignoring his really close links to family. Your investment backfired and it's not the buyer's responsibility to compensate you.
Come back to me when you have something to offer. And I mean offer something better than 13 and a future 1st.
