Malthouse must stay!

[itsintheblood]

Maybe you should just admit your memory isn't that good.

My memory is fine. Richo has torn you a new one and you're just scared to admit it.

 

[Captain_Brown_7]

Richmond threw the kitchen sink at him, and for good reason. He's definite AFL. An Anthony Rocca replacement. Will be interesting to compare Travis with Richmond's Adam Patterson in future years. The Tigers will be very disappointed that he chose Collingwood!

In case you were living on Mars a few years back, the reason Richmond didn't get Travis was because his old-man is still in the sh#ts with us for not taking Jason over Coughlan. Travis didn't 'choose' Collingwood. He had no choice in the matter.

 

[FIGJAM]

In case you were living on Mars a few years back, the reason Richmond didn't get Travis was because his old-man is still in the sh#ts with us for not taking Jason over Coughlan. Travis didn't 'choose' Collingwood. He had no choice in the matter.

Whatever helps you sleep at night.

 

[Bentleigh]

Whatever helps you sleep at night.

Yeah cause we are spewing over the draft picks we picked up

 

[Captain_Brown_7]

Whatever helps you sleep at night.

Its fact FuKCHEAD.

 

[FIGJAM]

Its fact FuKCHEAD.

Your username makes me laugh for several reasons!

 

[Captain_Brown_7]

Your username makes me laugh for several reasons!

Your stupidity makes ME laugh for several reasons

 

[FIGJAM]

Your stupidity makes ME laugh for several reasons

Well your stupider than me to the power of infinity plus one! No comebacks!!

 

[Captain_Brown_7]

Well your stupider than me to the power of infinity plus one! No comebacks!!

I send you my apologies on 2 accounts...

1. I apologise for not taking into conseideration that it is a weekend and that people under the age of 16 flood bigfooty.

2. My apologies to you for being a Collingwood supporter.

 

[FIGJAM]

I said NO comebacks!

 

[hotpie]

Dunno what you have against Brayden. If you think he hasn't got ability, then you've never seen him play.

I'd lay money that most people who bag The Shaws and Clokes have never seen Trav, Heath, Brayden or maybe even Cam play. Even Jason and Rhys are harshly judged because of one game.

Agree with your summary.

Brayden will make it
Rhys can make it if he grasps his final opportunity
Jason has deficiencies
Cam can make it (possibly no room for him and Anthony Rocca in the same 22, so he may have to wait his turn for a few years,)
Trav will make it
Heath probably wont make it.

thats a 2 out of 3 hit/miss ratio. thats a "usual" hit miss ratio in recruiting.

 

[Truetiger]

I'd lay money that most people who bag The Shaws and Clokes have never seen Trav, Heath, Brayden or maybe even Cam play. Even Jason and Rhys are harshly judged because of one game.

Agree with your summary.

Brayden will make it
Rhys can make it if he grasps his final opportunity
Jason has deficiencies
Cam can make it (possibly no room for him and Anthony Rocca in the same 22, so he may have to wait his turn for a few years,)
Trav will make it
Heath probably wont make it.

thats a 2 out of 3 hit/miss ratio. thats a "usual" hit miss ratio in recruiting.

Even the best of Collingwood fans which is not alot would come out and say shaw is a dud and name or not should be traded true?

 

[bradrowe#32]

My memory is fine. Richo has torn you a new one and you're just scared to admit it.

Are you actually reading what I'm posting? Or do you just take the same line of argument and use it in every reply?

You said he has tore us a new one 'a dozen times'. The statsitics prove that he did that 4 times and played about 8 or so good games. You honestly think after looking at those stats he has dominated us 12 times?

And where did I say that he hasn't played well against us. Give me the quote.

 

[YAKUZA]

Mick wont stay at Collingwood because he realises the bird has flown and he has no realistic chance of winning a premiership with the list he has.

 

[hotpie]

Even the best of Collingwood fans which is not alot would come out and say shaw is a dud and name or not should be traded true?

Ifyouspokeenglishmaybeiwoudlbeabletounderstandyouandgiveareply.

 

[Denno]

If you actually read the post, we were talking about Richardson's performances against Collingwood. Apparently he has ripped us a new hole 'a dozen times'. Fact is he has played 4 excellent games and 8 - 10 serviceable games. There is a fair difference between winning the game off your own boot and being a good player that helps contribute to the win.

Where does it say we are comparing Richardson and Tarrant?

The argument is whether or not Richo has ever torn Collingwood a new hole. Clearly by the stats he does not have particularly outstanding form against Collingwood. Good but not great.

Tarrant's stats are irrelevant to that argument.

Just thought I'd put some perspective on the argument.

Richo's stats get called "average" (against Collingwood) for a good player. These stats aren't much different to his career stats.

Yet Tarrant averages comfortably less than Richo, yet gets rated a "star" (by some, anyway).

Are Richo's stats really that bad, or "average"?

 

[bradrowe#32]

Just thought I'd put some perspective on the argument.

Richo's stats get called "average" (against Collingwood) for a good player. These stats aren't much different to his career stats.

Yet Tarrant averages comfortably less than Richo, yet gets rated a "star" (by some, anyway).

Are Richo's stats really that bad, or "average"?

I have never said he is a bad player.

I'm simply refuting the statement (where is IITB anyway?). I also never said they were average. The initial claim was that he dominated us 12 times, when he has only been a real match-winner on 4 occasions. His averages may be good, but unless he averages 5 or 6 goals against us, then he certainly hasn't 'tore us a new one a dozen times'.

 

[eddiesmith]

And putting all his ruck strategy into Josh Fraser, was just brilliant. Excellent plannig by the master coach.

Really? News to me, last time I checked he was our 2nd ruckman who will be rucking less and less when Richards is fit, which will be either this week or next. No problems there

I look forward to opening the paper every week and seeing Collingwood at the bottom again. It really will make Monday mornings worthwhile.

You are going to get your own fantasy paper written just for you are you

What you stupid Collingwood supporters don't understand is that Richmond could have had all 3 of the jokes... i mean Clokes.

Instead of drafting Jason, we chose one MARK COUGHLAN. That is why poor old David Cloke tried to stick it up the Tigers by getting all of his sons to Collingwood. I'm telling you now, i'd rather have Coughlan on my list than any or all of the Clokes.

Coughlan>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The 3 'Joke' brothers

You idiots really have no idea. You had no choice in the matter, you wanted all 3, you got 0. They didnt want to come to a club that was such a rabble.

I agree Richo tears us apart with his 1.6, 2.6 in a couple of his last meetings against the pies, such a good job that we won those games by not very much. Ifr he had kicked straight, you might have won, but he didnt and you lost, WHY? Because Richo cant kick. So what if he gets 16, 18 possies, he does ******** all with them. Points dont destroy teams

We are very happy to keep Mick, btw, Matthews left the pies in shambles, he will do the same to the lions.

For the tigers, what does Wallace have going for him? Has he ever won a flag? Ever done anything? No and no. He is ********, but with your low budget and ******** board, guess he was the only one you could get.