Kane McGoodwin
Make me an Admin!
- May 21, 2001
- 87,714
- 93,524
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Crows
It's absolutely clear there is a reason behind WW going to into Nicks protection mode.It's times like this I wonder whether you're trolling or not.
The post you responded to clearly says that the Nicks having a 33% winning record after 5 years is why he deserves to be sacked.
Then you try and counter with that does that mean that Adam Yze needs to be sacked too?
Adam Yze is in his first season with a list that he's inherited vs Nicks who's in his 5th year with a list that he's built and developed himself. There's zero basis for comparison between the two.
If Yze was in his 5th season and Richmond were still garbage then yes he would deserve to be sacked.
I'd go one further and say that Yze would be lucky to last three years if he continues to have a Matthew Nicks type record.
It's not the norm to hang on to failing coaches and just hope that things will eventurally "click". Both GC and St Kilda learned the hard way there's nothing at all to be gained from giving a failed coach more time than they deserve.
No one would logically do this without being influenced in some way.
The fact he has refused numerous times to deny he is being paid by AFC.
The fact he refused to answer GC's umpteen requests to give us a resson... any reason to retain Nicks... because he has Nix... & doesn't really believe what he is saying!