Kong
Hall of Famer
- Oct 11, 2007
- 32,185
- 16,848
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Nah, fish's just voicing his opinion, which is fair enough.
Just looks as though most of us disagree.
Just looks as though most of us disagree.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Nah, fish's just voicing his opinion, which is fair enough.
Just looks as though most of us disagree.
and its the essendon board that started this thread???Nah, fish's just voicing his opinion, which is fair enough.
Just looks as though most of us disagree.
and its the essendon board that started this thread???
seriouslly if any club lost thompson the way geelong did there would be bitter supporters out there, its life and everyone has differnt opinion.
Who gives a rats tossbag? Either way, I can't see us winning, if Geelong really cares about losing Thompson to us we'll just lose by more.
You could say I've become accustomed to losing rather quickly.
Once this match is over we will more than likely never have to hear about it again.
Geelong borrowed Bomba for 11 years, it was always a contingent risk he would return to Napier St. which many Cats do not have the depth of thinking to comprehend.
2. I think we all understand footy is a business, but Costa and Cook were always very public about Bomber's tenure being pretty much a handshake agreement - all he had to say was he wanted to go and a graceful exit would be arranged. After ten years, Bomber handled himself less than perfectly making a messy and sad exit possible.
Good luck for the game.
Without delving very far into recent posts, I can say that Thompson's departure doesn't bother me in the slightest from a fan point of view.
From a business point of view, I'd be very nervous dealing with him though. None of us know what was discussed at board level or even socially between Thompson, Cook and Costa with regards to his contract. Logic would suggest that Thompson not only broke his contract but his word too. This really highlights the sought of person Thompson is morally more than anything. Some people value this higher than others... Costa's background is hardly that of a clean skin either though, no one can dispute that. You can't blame for Costa having a poke at the guy though.
I'd imagine after this weeks game, all this BS will be forgotten about anyway. Lets hope for a good clean contest on Saturday w/no injuries.
You are misguided about the morality of the saga- unless you know who made the initial approach about Bomber joining EFC I suggest you steer clear.
Thompson was contracted to coach Geelong until the end of 2011, the media were biting at his heels for the last 3rd of the 2010 season about a move to the Bombers, which he continually denied interest. He then waited until the end of season and walked out. This is morally acceptable how??
Are you saying Thompson approached the Bombers first? I think it's been confirmed by many that Essendon went on a head hunting expedition in the latter part of 2010 when they identified Kinghts as a problem, not to mention the playing group.
It's no secret that Bomber loves the cash and tried to orchestrate a payout of his contract with the Cats even though he knew he was off to Essendon. This abject greed and lack of moral fibre is what still rankles with the football club's administration... and rightly so.
The Cats supporters are very happy with Chris Scott and all that he has brought to the club. His fresh ideas and enthusiasm has revitalised the older bodies and tweaked a stale game plan that had run its course.
Bomber in time, will be remembered as one of the great Geelong coaches. The irony is that it seems Bomber was telling the truth to some degree and does show signs of burn out.
Why is this being brought up again?