Murphy out Gilham in

Remove this Banner Ad

Thats a bit tough on Murphy. He's played some good footy and seemed to be in our best 18. However, we need Gilham to play and sometimes the tough calls have to be made.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Thats a bit tough on Murphy. He's played some good footy and seemed to be in our best 18. However, we need Gilham to play and sometimes the tough calls have to be made.
It is tough on murph just as it was tough on gilly being dropped for the dogs game. Probably just a matchup thing.
 
what the? stupid decision.

should have been ellis or young.

no, young was been a key player, particularly kicking the goal in the critical 2nd quarter. some people are quite stubborn and just aren't willing to understand or accept his role; run and carry, long kicking - offensive weapon.

good decision bring gilham in. without doubt though, murphy is an almost automatic selection to play on johnson next week. gilham would play on lonergan, craod on mooney, as last time that worked well, so it's going to have to be someone else that gets dropped this time.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Murphy out Gilham in

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top