Opinion New AFC HQ (Part 2): Family picnics on hiatus

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Unions have their place (look at the labour market in America...'at will employment' LMAO). There's a power disparity they go a long way to addressing. Also not sure 'you need legal permission to strike' is a good thing given that.

There's a difference between that and using the power of unions to threaten or abuse individuals acting in their company's interest, threaten people into acting with the union, or companies not involved in the dispute, which Setka does.

The fines against the CFMEU (that McBurnie would have been responsible for, for example:
Yes to this. Unions absolutely have a place but like most things balance is needed.

A personal story from many years ago when i had a short stint (only time ever) at a Local Authority. The EB agreement was up for renewal and management were pressing for a 1 + 2 (%) rise while the union was pushing for a 4 + 4. Anyway, off to the town hall for the big meeting with all management, ceo, staff and the union.

The ceo, who was a really nice guy, got up and explained how productivity had not warranted a 4 + 4 etc and he laid out a pretty good argument. The first people to get up and congratulate the ceo was the union rep. The union rep then said just before i go on, i want you all to know the ceo just had a 21% pay increase and the senior managers 15%.

Needless to say management sat down red faced. From memory the final deal was a 2 + 3.
 
So what’s your thoughts on the thugs blackmail?

What do my thoughts about Setka have to do with what my point was?

I don't actually like the current delegate of my own union - I think he is an unimpressive man who exaggerates and talks shit. I didn't vote for him and next election I will hope he loses - Doesn't mean I'm throwing the baby out with the bathwater and dismissing unions all together
 
What do my thoughts about Setka have to do with what my point was?

I don't actually like the current delegate of my own union - I think he is an unimpressive man who exaggerates and talks shit. I didn't vote for him and next election I will hope he loses - Doesn't mean I'm throwing the baby out with the bathwater and dismissing unions all together
This started with Setkas blackmailing the AFL, this type of behaviour is why a lot of people have issues with the union.

I asked your opinion and you didn’t answer, curious what your opinion is given this is in relation to football and we are on a football forum
 
This started with Setkas blackmailing the AFL, this type of behaviour is why a lot of people have issues with the union.

I asked your opinion and you didn’t answer, curious what your opinion is given this is in relation to football and we are on a football forum

Egotistical dude who loves the spotlight in a high position throws his weight around for attention and clout

Whether they are in private industry, politics, or unions, they are the same ilk ; just different sides
 
The thing is he wont achieve anything. Legally Septka has no leg to stand on and if work gets disrupted through him calling snap strikes, he will not succeed. If those strikes are illegal the workers can lose their jobs. This could actually see him removed. Could be his jump the shark moment.

He's not threatening strikes though, he's threatening work to rule
 
Yeah I agree

Unions definitely have their place, but there needs to be a healthy balance.

When clowns like Setka and the CFMEU constantly act like standover men it does unionism zero favours. That sort of crap becomes a lightning rod to those who push the anti union message and damages the reputation of the whole industry.
If you think football has a lot of brown paper bag deals ask John why he had a Visy contract to get rid of all of his
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Interesting mock up in the article.

The image has the Crows current facility with SANFL branding all over it.

Surely we're not giving the SANFL our current facility along with 9 million dollars are we 😯
There wouldn't be much point in knocking it down to spite them, would there?
 
There wouldn't be much point in knocking it down to spite them, would there?

No but I was always under the assumption that we'd receive some sort of financial return on it whether it's through a long term lease etc
 
Interesting mock up in the article.

The image has the Crows current facility with SANFL branding all over it.

Surely we're not giving the SANFL our current facility along with 9 million dollars are we 😯
Not until we are ready to move into our new home.
 
Interesting mock up in the article.

The image has the Crows current facility with SANFL branding all over it.

Surely we're not giving the SANFL our current facility along with 9 million dollars are we 😯

this is from the council agenda from the other night, it appears they are building something on the other side and the AFC headquarters is becoming residential land

Screenshot_13-6-2024_122845_www.charlessturt.sa.gov.au.jpeg
Screenshot_13-6-2024_123222_www.charlessturt.sa.gov.au.jpeg
 
Chief executive salaries rose by an average of 14% in the past financial year, according to the latest annual report from the Governance Institute of Australia. While general staff working at listed companies received average fixed pay increases of about 5% over the past 12 months.

Yeah it's definitely those unions doing the damage......

Yes, executives are worth every cent. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Absolute twaddle.

Most executives of companies are overpaid. Most senior management is overpaid.

As a mate found out yesterday, it isn’t what you know or whether you are qualified, it is who you know.
 
Has there been a potential timeline to completion and moving in once approval is final? 1 year? 2 years? Etc..
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Opinion New AFC HQ (Part 2): Family picnics on hiatus

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top