Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Locked up tight these daysI've tried a few ways to get past paywall with no luck. Anyone got a solution?
I don't pretend to know all the ins and outs of the SANFL / SAAFL situation and what they might need for various purposes. Just in broad, general terms, I think it should be viable for the AFC to present a plan that involves many dollars spent on many bright and shiny things, that the SANFL / SAAFL can have reasonable access to (not control) under and arrangement where the AFC is the head tenant. But not bright shiny things built on land that the SANFL controls.It depends what the SAAFL / SANFL want from Thebarton. They need a facility for a range of representative teams. That's now our problem but a presumption that they will not want to have some control isn't realistic. Likewise we will want control.
We will have a second womens team soon, there is going to be a fair bit of demand on the facilities.
The SAAFL would just like new offices and hosting ability for their Grand Finals I'd imagine.I don't pretend to know all the ins and outs of the SANFL / SAAFL situation and what they might need for various purposes. Just in broad, general terms, I think it should be viable for the AFC to present a plan that involves many dollars spent on many bright and shiny things, that the SANFL / SAAFL can have reasonable access to (not control) under and arrangement where the AFC is the head tenant. But not bright shiny things built on land that the SANFL controls.
I've tried a few ways to get past paywall with no luck. Anyone got a solution?
Interesting comments and flies in the face of our statement, Olsen and Silvers comments. You would think he'd be aware of our position, so this is what I am guessing is behind it:Ross Pellegra seems to think there's 3 secret sites we are considering.
The SAAFL would just like new offices and hosting ability for their Grand Finals I'd imagine.
If this is to work well we have to be the head tenant.
It's a pretty nothing article.I've tried a few ways to get past paywall with no luck. Anyone got a solution?
https://archive.md/ use the top option to paste the link. It takes a bit of time to do its thing.I've tried a few ways to get past paywall with no luck. Anyone got a solution?
Interesting comments and flies in the face of our statement, Olsen and Silvers comments. You would think he'd be aware of our position, so this is what I am guessing is behind it:
a) Club wants someone external touting there are other options to improve our bargaining position
or
b) We've wanted to keep the other options to ourselves not to get hopes up and to not be seen as losing out again
or
c) Ross is trying to save face
Dont think Ross cares much for face saving, he already owns enough here and is about to buy Adelaide UnitedInteresting comments and flies in the face of our statement, Olsen and Silvers comments. You would think he'd be aware of our position, so this is what I am guessing is behind it:
a) Club wants someone external touting there are other options to improve our bargaining position
or
b) We've wanted to keep the other options to ourselves not to get hopes up and to not be seen as losing out again
or
c) Ross is trying to save face
The old Panther Park at St Marys has an excellent N-S oval and abundant surrounding space for elite ancillary facilities and a members clubrooms. This area is also zoned light industrial so less complaints from existing snobby residents. There is no strong local community attachment to the space. But the thought was it's too far from the city. Would also need to relocate Rugby League SA, but that would take relative peanuts. A second oval would likely needed to be at Flinders though.You have summed it up well I think. I am not sure the perfect option exists. There are probably 20 good options but location and a members facility are an issue.
Maybe we will revisit some of them. Of all of them I think the Flinders Uni had potential but just to far from where we want to be based.
I expect if it is Thebarton, we won't need RossInteresting comments and flies in the face of our statement, Olsen and Silvers comments. You would think he'd be aware of our position, so this is what I am guessing is behind it:
a) Club wants someone external touting there are other options to improve our bargaining position
or
b) We've wanted to keep the other options to ourselves not to get hopes up and to not be seen as losing out again
or
c) Ross is trying to save face
True, well lets hope we pull a rabbit out of the hat.I expect if it is Thebarton, we won't need Ross
I expect we willI expect if it is Thebarton, we won't need Ross
I think Olsen said previously it'll be turned into residential housing. I think the figure was something like it was gonna cost $60-$80 million for the land which immediately ruled it out as an option for us.Anyone got the goss as to what’s happening with the brewery site?
I think Olsen said previously it'll be turned into residential housing. I think the figure was something like it was gonna cost $60-$80 million for the land which immediately ruled it out as an option for us.
Its currently being cleaned up and will go to market later this year. Probably look exactly like the Bowden proposal, and compete for the same dollars.Anyone got the goss as to what’s happening with the brewery site?
12ft.ioI've tried a few ways to get past paywall with no luck. Anyone got a solution?
God youre negative"Three mystery alternative sites"
Yeah right.