Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which club are you talking about? Lions have a yellow M and Moshi is still green (only single colours, though).I thought AFL was ruling out coloured logos in that neck spot?
WCE ditched theirs
Eagles retails differ from their PI's, Lions makes sense as yellow fits with their scheme but green on saints feels so out of placeWhich club are you talking about? Lions have a yellow M and Moshi is still green (only single colours, though).
Yeah the difference in the PI was pointed out when they were doing the team photo i think, not sure if there is any requirement, but definitely a good choice of change for the Weagles, no idea why the Saints think green is a good ideaEagles retails differ from their PI's, Lions makes sense as yellow fits with their scheme but green on saints feels so out of place
Yeah the difference in the PI was pointed out when they were doing the team photo i think, not sure if there is any requirement, but definitely a good choice of change for the Weagles, no idea why the Saints think green is a good idea
But wouldn't white have stood out better than green? When players are running around all people see is green mush, and no-one immediately goes "that green mush clearly means greenProbably because they’re millions in debt and Mosh either paid more to have their logo in their corporate colours or possibly even the sponsorship was contingent on it.
Anyone notice players numbers on guernseys have become smaller to accommodate sponsorship to the top and bottom of the back of guernsey ? .. apologies if similar already posted
Seems like if it's one colour, regardless of white, green or yellow, it's fine.I thought AFL was ruling out coloured logos in that neck spot?
WCE ditched theirs
But wouldn't white have stood out better than green? When players are running around all people see is green mush, and no-one immediately goes "that green mush clearly means greenmushI mean Mosh"
Seems like if it's one colour, regardless of white, green or yellow, it's fine.
But wouldn't white have stood out better than green? When players are running around all people see is green mush, and no-one immediately goes "that green mush clearly means greenmushI mean Mosh"
I'm just pointing out that both are useless as no one instinctively associates Mosh with green as it is not a massive brand. Realistically green just ruins the jumper aesthetic more than anything.As opposed to a white mush?
Do you really think people notice or are reading any sponsor when they are running around?
It’s for the close ups, still shots and apparel. Of which the sponsor is clear as day.
Expect a 1966 remake for this match tooIn round 3 at the G though St Kilda is the home team as part of their 150th anniversary celebrations
Don't you understand? We're Guernsey NerdsTbh I've never heard of Mosh till folk here started complaining about the logo.
They're mentioned at least 10 times on this page alone.
I bet a few people visited their website to see what colours they use.
Not such thing as bad publicity etc.
so, take away its advertising, how does it become a massive brand?Mosh with green as it is not a massive brand
TBH sell different products. Their market is incredibly limited and is specifically for men's health subscriptions. If they pivoted and approached women's health in the same way, or even offer products that aren't limited to only males with specific issues, they may see their customer-base grow.so, take away its advertising, how does it become a massive brand?
My WaNd... LoOk aT mY wAnDTBH sell different products. Their market is incredibly limited and is specifically for men's health subscriptions. If they pivoted and approached women's health in the same way, or even offer products that aren't limited to only males with specific issues, they may see their customer-base grow.
Without looking at products, given that St Kilda is one of the smaller-watched Vic teams, they could maybe not advertise on a small-viewership team. I feel like their product is bizarrely placed in that it MAY work in the football industry with a larger team perhaps, but their target market would be the older Facebook/Instagram user, with which you can specifcally target your advertising to that demographic, and not limit it to football fans AND older male products. They would more than likely find more advertising benefit online, given that their entire product is online-based.
Just a final gripe - we wouldn't actually complain if it was a massive MOSH logo on the back, as everyone is used to the large logos in varying colours. The issue people have is that it's a bright green logo on the collar, may as well go back to the poo-brown of Dare.
It doesn't look as bad on the home kit as they used the muted dark green (apologies for posting a pic of Rupert Grint)
This is a bizarre take.TBH sell different products. Their market is incredibly limited and is specifically for men's health subscriptions. If they pivoted and approached women's health in the same way, or even offer products that aren't limited to only males with specific issues, they may see their customer-base grow.
He said "take away advertising", that's what I came up with in that very specific scenario, there is nothing inheritantly wrong with what they offer currently.This is a bizarre take.
Hard enough to get men into any clinical setting, these guys have actually found a fantastic market by creating a one stop telehealth platform specifically for men, tackling relatively taboo topics.
Isn’t it dick pills site?What is mosh?
Hmm i’m assuming the same will be for West Coast with their academies but I wonder what logo will be under their WAFL teams jumperLions academy jumper by Belgravia Apparel (New Balance) pictured along with last year's design by Classic
View attachment 1623262