Watching our game on the weekend and some of the other matches, especially anytime with Gordon De Goey or Patrick Cripps playing, being spun around 720 degrees is now OK. I would have thought the AFL would be hard to crack down on these as HTB given the only alternative for the tackler not being rewarded for these tackles would be to throw the opponent to ground.
Given that the rule is supposed to be that a player must make an immediate attempt to dispose of the ball (prior opportunity or not), a 360 (when their arms are free or mostly free) is clearly not an "immediate" attempt, but instead waiting for an opportunity to choose where they dispose it to.The AFL in the PS said they'd be much harder on HTB this season .....a 360 degree would be HTB
Like most of the AFL's huffing & puffing ....that strictness lasted just a few rounds & has been watered down .....exactly the same that has occurred with push in the back
Everything gets watered down
As for the sling tackle - I agree that it's getting out of hand as to what is / isn't a dangerous tackle, but at the same time I can understand the desire to get it it (slamming the player to the ground with consequent risk of head knock) out of the game. As Brasher says, if players are given too long to dispose, then there's an incentive to bring them to ground.
However - as I recall from back in the day, the ideal tackling technique was to wrap the player up and then drop your knees, thus forcing them down - and even if the player is strong enough to stay standing while there's 100kg of opponent pulling them down, well, then, the key is in the wrapping up. I dunno - maybe if that was the preferred tackle, slinging to the ground wouldn't be so necessary.
Did we see players being slung to the ground in the tackle, back in the dim dark past? I don't know...