Keep Hill, Bennett, Speed, Papalia, Healy, Thomas, Buckley and replace the other 20+A petition to sack BT.
Honestly, if they sacked every commentator, and started with fresh new ones, I wouldn’t miss any of the old ones,
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Keep Hill, Bennett, Speed, Papalia, Healy, Thomas, Buckley and replace the other 20+A petition to sack BT.
Honestly, if they sacked every commentator, and started with fresh new ones, I wouldn’t miss any of the old ones,
Yup great to see suck it RioliGreat viewing
It is right but I’m not sure how Harley’s was 2.A week seems right to me.
Ofcourse its fkd but thats how the games going.So out of curiosity for all those calling for Dangers head over the tackle, how was he supposed to complete the tackle in that situation?
He didn't sling him, wasn't two motions and Walsh threw himself forward the moment he felt the contact from Danger, contributing to the momentum.
What's his alternative here aside from not tackling him? If you don't pin the arms he gets to literally throw the ball to a teammate under the current interpretation of the rules.
The games ****ed, genuinely and truly ****ed if this pretty tame tackle is causing so much angst.
If you pin both arms and the tackled player’s head hits the ground your done. That’s my interpretation of the AFL tribunal. Now I expect because it’s Dangerfield he will get off on appeal.So out of curiosity for all those calling for Dangers head over the tackle, how was he supposed to complete the tackle in that situation?
He didn't sling him, wasn't two motions and Walsh threw himself forward the moment he felt the contact from Danger, contributing to the momentum.
What's his alternative here aside from not tackling him? If you don't pin the arms he gets to literally throw the ball to a teammate under the current interpretation of the rules.
The games ****ed, genuinely and truly ****ed if this pretty tame tackle is causing so much angst.
If you pin both arms and the tackled player’s head hits the ground your done. That’s my interpretation of the AFL tribunal. Now I expect because it’s Dangerfield he will get off on appeal.
If you pin both arms and the tackled player’s head hits the ground your done. That’s my interpretation of the AFL tribunal. Now I expect because it’s Dangerfield he will get off on appeal.
AFL don’t care. They didn’t care that the guy tried to sidestep Reid which added to the motion. Reid should’ve let him go apparently. We were just trying to say it should only be 1 week like all of these others coming up but nope.You didn't answer my question though.
What's the alternative either than not tackle the player or tackle them ineffectively? At that point we may as well remove the tackle from the game altogether as the purpose of it is to prevent the opponent from effectively disposing of the ball/turning it over.
Yep sling across the line and head hit the ground. Will be a week if they add the potential could be 2.Lets see if they will suspend one of the Rowbottom now, slingy action, across the line, head hit the turf, got up and seems to have played on fine.
AFL don’t care. They didn’t care that the guy tried to sidestep Reid which added to the motion. Reid should’ve let him go apparently. We were just trying to say it should only be 1 week like all of these others coming up but nope.
I’m still perplexed how the potential to injure was added to Reid’s to get the extra week but all others are just a standard week or apparently nothing.