Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am actually keen to see if they're is anything at all to the media speculation he might take Melbourne to court to get his playing contract thrown out on unsafe work conditions.Keep seeing Petracca to Pies but just don't see how it gets done without them giving up a very good player to get the picks they need.
Amazed the media hasn't started a Petracca to Essendon rumour since he ticks a lot of their boxes. They have the picks to get it done, they could throw Wright into a trade since Melbourne desperately need a key forward, they have a massive supporter base, they are guaranteed big games i.e Anzac Day, Dreamtime match, big crowds against teams like Pies/Tigers/Blues/Geelong/Hawks.
If gold coast do that then Dimma has lost his mind
If Richmond get those picks for those players some money is being handed around in paper bags
Or some white powders in plastic zip lock bagsIf Richmond get those picks for those players some money is being handed around in paper bags
Pick 6 and 20 for Rioli is beyond delusional that makes the Ablett trade look very very comical
But why on earth did he decide to play on when in great pain and knowing his organs had received a severe blow?I am actually keen to see if they're is anything at all to the media speculation he might take Melbourne to court to get his playing contract thrown out on unsafe work conditions.
A wild concept but in legal terms I imagine not actually that far fetched. Just timing of it because a case would take ages. It's more the threat of it
did Ralphy come up with that...
Well it's a good question but also probably one that doesn't fall on an employee in a court case. If he had died I doubt the coroner accepts it was his decision aloneBut why on earth did he decide to play on when in great pain and knowing his organs had received a severe blow?
Yeah Barrass is the one where I think West Coast lose something substantial with him out and he's the one I think gets argued over.Tiges will get more for Rioli than most people on here think.
Everything is in Richmond's favour to capitalise.
U cannot be cereal.
It may have been his decision alone, and I doubt if his employer ordered him to return to the field against his will, but the argument would centre around whether the clubās employees should have stepped in to forcibly prevent him from returning if that is what he wanted to do.Well it's a good question but also probably one that doesn't fall on an employee in a court case. If he had died I doubt the coroner accepts it was his decision alone
Let go of all the good players and sign a walking mummy right so smart
I'm no lawyer but I reckon the employer will still have a duty of care regardlessIt may have been his decision alone, and I doubt if his employer ordered him to return to the field against his will, but the argument would centre around whether the clubās employees should have stepped in to forcibly prevent him from returning if that is what he wanted to do.
I agree. But there is the potential to argue that Petracca contributed to it. This wouldnāt absolve the club of negligence but might reduce liability from 100%. It wonāt reach court proceedings as it will be settled one way or the other.I'm no lawyer but I reckon the employer will still have a duty of care regardless