- Aug 15, 2009
- 1,722
- 4,125
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
And there is the difference. Clarkson defends another coaches plans. Bradley does not know what the other coach intends or executes.Wow, if it's that easy our game plan is RUBBISH.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
And there is the difference. Clarkson defends another coaches plans. Bradley does not know what the other coach intends or executes.Wow, if it's that easy our game plan is RUBBISH.
The 6-6-6 thing is beyond mind-boggling.
Brad changes rule.
Rule doesn't work for Brad.
Brad calls out rule changes for being bad.
Bad Brad.
Scott has said over a million times “coaches are the custodians of the game.” He does seem to have some sort of agenda about the greater good of footy, he is more vocal than most about irrelevant situations to us.To his defence, he said the rule would be better for the game, not necessarily for us. You could ask if he puts the club, who pays him, ahead of his caretaker of the game role, which is an unpaid one. Perhaps he should fight harder for advantages for the club while he is an employee of the club? Not sure if coaches have signed some greater overriding oath or not. Other clubs seem ready to exploit everything to the fullest of their ability.
Maybe we just don't have that killer instinct as a club any longer, who knows.
I think the only under performers in our team right now are Tarrant(underdone), Simpkin and Goldstein(only ruck at the club). The rest are performing to the best of their ability in the role they've been given. There are maybe 2/3 feasible changes that make us better personnel wise right now.
The form is ok, the players are trying. It's a sad state of affairs at arden street.
Scott has said over a million times “coaches are the custodians of the game.” He does seem to have some sort of agenda about the greater good of footy, he is more vocal than most about irrelevant situations to us.
It’s taken you awhile. Glad to have you on board!Throw away the cheque book, go to the draft rebuild right this cant go on. I thought it was going to be the backline thats kills us but its the forward line. no Options up front. when given the chance in a crucial moment Jack Z misses twice. I dont know but we are in serious trouble, coming in I didnt give us hope but after that 1st quarter and another winnable game goes south. im Officially on Board #SCOTTOUT
Campbell and dancing jy should not be in the team. Prues never got a look in and he keeps playing this clown.Why the **** is Campbell in the team? He is on our list as insurance for Goldy. That is it!
Could you do us a favour, pull that info for the last 10 years for both clubs please.Sorry guys. We were rather concerned at quarter time
Read through the first 7 pages of the thread to see what you think and nearly every post is about Scott, Clarkson or both
Our Coaching group:
Alastair Clarkson
Sam Mitchell
Darren Glass
Scott Burns
Chris Newman
Adam Yze
Damien Monkhurst
I had to go to the North website to see who your assistants were:
Brad Scott
Gavin Brown
Darren Crocker
Rhyce Shaw
Jarred Moore
Leigh Tudor
If the problem is coaching is it really Brad Scott? Or is it the support staff / systems etc
Some clubs have tried the keep the coach / clean out the assistants option
Could you do us a favour, pull that info for the last 10 years for both clubs please.
Sorry no idea on your previous assistant coaches
But ours have been good - pretty much half the AFL are currently being run by Clarksons minions (including the last 3 premiership sides)
And my friend, that is what our mate, Brad, is alluding toPerhaps that agenda could be a paid job at the AFL once the club/football world realise he isn't a very good senior coach.
True, but the roos do not have the skills or the nerve to pull off the handballing in defence. It hasn't worked all year.First Quarter:
Short kicks in the back half until we found an opening.
And when the opening was found, we went fast and direct.
VERY good football.
Rest of the game:
Clarkson made sure to put the pressure on the backs and not let us chip it around as freely. Because of this we either.
A. Went longer down the line.
B. Tried to break the zone with handball.
C. Tried riskier kicks through the middle.
I dislike BS as a coach and I don't think he is the one who can lead us to the promised land.
But to say he doesnt have a plan B is just plain wrong.
The team tried different things. They didnt come off, but there were definitely changes in the way we moved the ball.
Sorry guys. We were rather concerned at quarter time
Read through the first 7 pages of the thread to see what you think and nearly every post is about Scott, Clarkson or both
Our Coaching group:
Alastair Clarkson
Sam Mitchell
Darren Glass
Scott Burns
Chris Newman
Adam Yze
Damien Monkhurst
I had to go to the North website to see who your assistants were:
Brad Scott
Gavin Brown
Darren Crocker
Rhyce Shaw
Jarred Moore
Leigh Tudor
If the problem is coaching is it really Brad Scott? Or is it the support staff / systems etc
Some clubs have tried the keep the coach / clean out the assistants option
The cost of Garner vs. the cost of Scully is very different. Garner also had a season where he looked to be over his injuries. We need his type. We don't need Scully. Maybe before Polec, Hall, and Scott but it'd be pure luxury. We have far more pressing matters.If they are willing to have Garns (no dig at him) on the list for 6 years, then taking Scully for nothing is a no brainer to me.
When your chasing the ball for the greater part of three quarters, your always going to run out of puff.I am astonished at our lack of fitness. It was clear as each of our three matches has been played out the opposition teams have run all over us. Forget coaching strategies, who is responsible for fitness at our club? Is it time to go back to Utah? Or better still send them all to Puckapunyal for the pre season!!!