Brian's nephew, David's cousin.Sierrakowski, any relation to Brian and David?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Brian's nephew, David's cousin.Sierrakowski, any relation to Brian and David?
The New Sydney Side Venture has injected some hope into the Competition for the local boys as there is a pool of talented players that have not been picked up on Scholarships that are the true footballers egar to do what they do best PLAY AUSSIE RULES and they are local. The vast majority of Scholarships are not at the standard of these guys waiting in the line to be picked up. The selectors are going to have a great time with these guys because they are hungry and had the jack of the current processes and ready to have ago. These are the guys that don't get to be rotated that run at the ball for 4 quarters with massive work rates and large engines they don't require ice when the going gets tuff and don't have prick relations pushing their carts for them.....
Didn't set the world on fire.how did Max Wilson go this year? is he draft-worthy?
If clubs are given concessions to recruit players from Sydney as they do for recruiting from Ireland I am sure there would be more incentive for clubs to put resources in there. eg -only half of money paid for a player recruited from a sydney club is on salary cap for 1st 2 years on the list etc. or one extra sydney player allowed on list etc per club.
They do get concessions. At the start of the programme, when it was compulsory for each club to give out at least one scholarship, the AFL was providing financial assistance (effectively funding those scholarships). Now that it is no longer compulsory, not sure what funding is made available.
But also, if a scholarship player is taken as a rookie when eligible, they count outside the normal rookie quota for their first year on the list (much like international rookies). Indeed, list wise the concession is greater than for Irish youngsters, since they are deemed non-International for the purposes of rookie list quota.
Gee we have only been saying and asking for that for the last 4 years.That is a reasonable concession, but not a great concession. I guess they don't want clubs raiding sydney before the West Sydney club is set up, but in my viewpoint I would give even more. If you recruit a player from Sydney then he should be outside your list payments for at least 3 years. That would make it far more interesting for clubs.
I would also think the Riverina Footy league should be included in this little party, but maybe they only get 1 year outside list payment or whatever.
Either way -open it up to all NSW.
Any one know anything of Braedon Jones or Daniel Lloyd or Chris Ogle?
Ok thanks, do you have any idea about the positions they play?Jones and Lloyd both played in the Black Diamond league in Newcastle, Jones for Newcastle City, Lloyd for Killarney Vale.
Jones played seniors for Newcastle City and won the premiership. He played 15 senior games, kicked 11 goals and was named in the best player lists 7 times, including the grand final.
He kicked 4 goals and allegedly had 52 possesions in the first final in the U18's (City lost by a point).
Lloyd is still U16 (I think, someone will correct me if I'm wrong, I'm sure) but played 4 games in the U18's and was named in the best players in 3 of them, including kicking 6 in one of them.
He played 3 games in the seniors as well.
Ogle plays for UNSW/Eastern Suburbs in the Sydney comp. He played seniors most of the year but got dropped for the last 3 games.
Ok thanks, do you have any idea about the positions they play?
Is that right?They do get concessions. At the start of the programme, when it was compulsory for each club to give out at least one scholarship, the AFL was providing financial assistance (effectively funding those scholarships). Now that it is no longer compulsory, not sure what funding is made available.
But also, if a scholarship player is taken as a rookie when eligible, they count outside the normal rookie quota for their first year on the list (much like international rookies). Indeed, list wise the concession is greater than for Irish youngsters, since they are deemed non-International for the purposes of rookie list quota.
To give an example, when it come to the Under 16 Rams in 2009, scholarship holders get right of way. There are around 18 of them. Players from the Riverina, ACT, and newcomers, overlooked players and late developers from the scholarship zones have to compete for the handful of remaining places.
Harmesy37, I think in total NSW/ACT have about 50 or 51 scholarships going into 2009. The 2008 NSW/ACT U18 RAMS v VIC COUNTRY there are five NSW/ACT scholars from the squad list of 39 that I can identify could be more not 100% certain and they are likely to be the younger players going into the 2009 season as actual 18s.
I'm not sure if a pre-match to validate scholar players will make a difference although a perfect concept, remember AFL has already selected the best that is why their on the contracts.
There where 15 from 39 that are scholarship holders.
I got hammered at the time (when NSW/ACT beat Vic C) because I didn't think that it was great that 9 guys from Sydney where in the side that beat them. Sydney footy is improving and this is because of the scholarships blah blah blah.
My arguement than and still is now, NSW/ACT beat the Vics NOT guys from Sydney and players from the Riverina (which is always strong and the main footy that they play *sic*), and thats why the scheme should be all NSW/ACT and not just trying to find new players at 14 15 who have never played the game before and then try and fast track them into rep and state teams.