Not for me. We need to develop our young players not continually lose them. Much prefer to keep Allan.Allan for pick 9 would be very tempting
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not for me. We need to develop our young players not continually lose them. Much prefer to keep Allan.Allan for pick 9 would be very tempting
I reckon we have to give F1, 36 and Noble for 13 and 23.Pick 13 and 23
We're not doing that according to leppa.I reckon we have to give F1, 36 and Noble for 13 and 23.
Then 13, 23 and Richards for Houston and 39
Out: F1, Noble, Richards and 36.
In: Houston and 39.
The latter, clearly. If they’re rejecting that then they won’t reject us. They might as well give us the pick right now.Either gold coast have rocks in their head or they are in deep discussions with Collingwood for pick 13.
There might be a riot if we miss out on Houston due to pick 36.We're not doing that according to leppa.
We dont plan on selling all our draft picks for 1 player.
So we would be very hesitant not to give up 36
I think we might keep the 23 pick. Houston for F1,Richards & 39I reckon we have to give F1, 36 and Noble for 13 and 23.
Then 13, 23 and Richards for Houston and 39
Out: F1, Noble, Richards and 36.
In: Houston and 39.
Yea so our offer is significantly worse atm. We need to come to the table with pick 36Pick 13 and 23
GC are going to get what they want. 2 future firsts, Lukosius's horrible contract off the books, Noble, and probably academy points for Lombard. It'll be an awesome deal for them.Says to me GC are all in on our deal with the finer points the only hold up
We should only hand over 36 if they are willing to hand over 29 in return.I reckon we have to give F1, 36 and Noble for 13 and 23.
Then 13, 23 and Richards for Houston and 39
Out: F1, Noble, Richards and 36.
In: Houston and 39.5
Houston was originally slated to go to the Dees before the Petracca drama blew up and then he and his manager changed their minds. Dees were willing to part with their first and future first if the talk was to be believed. I doubt he’d do a backflip just because they did a pick swap.There’s no way Dees would attempt to use 5 / 9 on Houston, right?
And we get what we want. Houston with Cornes and Ralph hate typing articles all week about us.GC are going to get what they want. 2 future firsts, Lukosius's horrible contract off the books, Noble, and probably academy points for Lombard. It'll be an awesome deal for them.
They're not ****ing with that for a slightly better deal on one part of the assets they're selling
Possible reckon we pay overs to GC and unders to portI reckon we have to give F1, 36 and Noble for 13 and 23.
Then 13, 23 and Richards for Houston and 39
Out: F1, Noble, Richards and 36.
In: Houston and 39.
Dees have significant issues with holes everywhere and are facing the real possibility of starting a rebuild, especially if petracca and Oliver leave in the next 2 years.There’s no way Dees would attempt to use 5 / 9 on Houston, right?
Port will tell him Dees North or Port.Houston was originally slated to go to the Dees before the Petracca drama blew up and then he and his manager changed their minds. Dees were willing to part with their first and future first if the talk was to be believed. I doubt he’d do a backflip just because they did a pick swap.
If they’re against giving us 13 and 23 for Noble and our F1, why the hell would they change their mind for an extra unfavourable (for them) pick swap?We should only hand over 36 if they are willing to hand over 29 in return.
F1,36,noble
13,23,29
You aren’t serious?Port will tell him Dees North or Port.
Unless we can involve a 3rd or 4th club. Just have no capital. It's poker with dud hand.