Scodog10
Brownlow Medallist
Nope it’s crap list management. In each case it’s a player with a contract for next year who would be cut completely if the re-contracting club had waited until the end of the year or not put in place a games trigger.If it was Geelong it would be known as great list management.
That said the outrage is ridiculous from most punters because the pathway has changed out of sight the past 25 years since the rookie list was first introduced. The type of project that used to be on the initial rookie list is now being caught earlier as an NGA so they’re receiving the opportunities that were once denied to them and the alternative pathway guys go on the Cat B list. Basically the old school rookie is now more often than not getting picked up in the national draft.
I’m an advocate of increasing list sizes to 45-50 and doing away with the Cat A and B rookie list, but keeping in place an alternative pathway for internationals and the likes of Condon or Parker to make the transition back to the elite pathway as easy as possible by sidestepping the draft. By lifting list sizes you can also hopefully grow the talent pool ahead of the introduction of the Devils. You watch though list sizes will remain as is, clubs will lose players and everyone will bemoan a lack of talent…