Just seen it, how exciting!Pies have expressed interest in Alex Davies.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just seen it, how exciting!Pies have expressed interest in Alex Davies.
Ginnivan reconsidered his future with us after his exit meeting with Fly when he was told to lift his act off field, on field and his professionalism in general.It was widely reported Ginnivan reconsidered his future with us after we showed interest in Schultz
Richards is now considering his future with us, which would be why? For more opportunities (and a longer deal)
You can attempt to spin this however you feel comfortable. But it doesn’t change the fact that the trade - particularly in hindsight, has turned out bad for us and seems to continue to come back to bite us with each new turn of events
If Richards is considering his future with us, opportunities would be a major reason for it.
If we didn’t have Schultz, do you not think Richards would have played more games and would be playing more games going forward?
I’m no expert, but from what I’ve seen on baseline footy this draft is stacked at the top end. It would need to be something tasty for me to move 20!If we get pick 20 I sincerely hope we keep it off limits in trades and invest it on the best KPP available in the draft. There are quite a few rated around that point.
BOOMThat’s absolute garbage! We’d had enough of brand Ginnivan and his antics so we went hard at a better player for our system in Shoota. We then did a Lukocious and encouraged him to consider his options. It was never lead by Ginnivan he just never twigged we were serious like a heart attack on what his off field antics would do for his career at Collingwood.
To reiterate a better player limiting the opportunities of a lesser player is not the problem of the better player. What part of that is spin? Richards has a better contract in front of him from another club hence why he’s weighing his options.
The crux of the issue is your views on Shoota don’t align with the clubs. You’re then allowing his trade cost to cloud your judgement entirely. The hypocrisy of your posting (as highlighted by EM) is just a thinly veiled swipe at Shoota and I’m going to go super hard in his defense if you want to make an argument out of it.
Davies and Peatling would be a great start
Sun on Pies' radar, Dees defender gets interest, Magpie’s big call
Check out all the latest trade news from around the Leaguewww.afl.com.au
This is a nice play that we can work into the Noble dealPies have expressed interest in Alex Davies.
I like it, future stars alongside Naicos.Davies and Peatling would be a great start
If we can hold onto a couple of future firsts to land Cadman / Callaghan, we can re-shape the list quickly
It might be the only way they can sell memberships for the next 3 years.With Petraca’s health worries is really worth more than a future 1st and say pick 20? Maybe throw in one of our young Rucks and another young fringe player with potential… I know well unders for a fully fit Petraca at his prime but that’s not what I think you will be getting. Would Richmond really stump up for x2 first rounders for him?
All these expressions of interest must be pleasing for TradeDraftPies have expressed interest in Alex Davies.
TD loves a good EOI process.All these expressions of interest must be pleasing for TradeDraft
Send him over in the JFN trade, easyPies have expressed interest in Alex Davies.
From what I read the other day, it won't happen. Not up to it yet.For those that know what are the prospects of Luke Quaynor looking like in terms of being drafted by us this season?
If we got those two alone somehow I’d be thrilled, adds youth to our mids and sets us up well.Fly wasn’t kidding when he said we would be aggressive.
Davies and Peatling would be two bargain basement types that would fix an immediate need and balance to our list in the Lipinski mould.
20 for Peatling sounds excessive personallyIf we got those two alone somehow I’d be thrilled, adds youth to our mids and sets us up well.
Basically you could
JFN+ pick for Davies + Pick 20
Pick 20 for Peatling
Send a second over for Keane
Acquire Tomlinson as cheap depth
Eff off Geelong.
Fly wasn’t kidding when he said we would be aggressive.
Davies and Peatling would be two bargain basement types that would fix an immediate need and balance to our list in the Lipinski mould.
Sullivan is the only one who should be kept really.I suspect our SSP boys are gone if we're targetting these blokes.
I mean if we want him that would be the easiest way.Wrapping Davies up into a Noble trade would be handy. I don't see us getting Davies AND 20 for Noble though.
Similar to Peatling, lack of opportunity due to star midfield but when he has got chances he’s shown a lotI haven't paid too much attention to Davies, but he seems to have some fans in here. What do we like about him?
I thought Peatling was a free agent.If we got those two alone somehow I’d be thrilled, adds youth to our mids and sets us up well.
Basically you could do
JFN and a pick for Davies + Pick 20
Send Pick 20 over for Peatling
Send a second/third over for Keane
Acquire Tomlinson as cheap depth
That would be a nice period
I wouldn't keep him if we add an inside mid.Sullivan is the only one who should be kept really.