![](https://images.bigfootymedia.com/icons/mobile-bullets/geelong.png)
You do understand a contract requires Danger's signature, don't you?Of course Carlton would take him with pick 1 in the PSD. What would Dangerfield do? Sit out of the game for the 5 or 6 years of his contract? Thats a long wait
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: GWS Giants v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 65% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
AFLW 2024 - Round 3 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
You do understand a contract requires Danger's signature, don't you?Of course Carlton would take him with pick 1 in the PSD. What would Dangerfield do? Sit out of the game for the 5 or 6 years of his contract? Thats a long wait
Point missed entirely.
Oh sorry you meant he wouldn't sign on at Carlton, but the issue there is when you register as a player in the AFL you abide by the conditions set, that you will go to any team that drafts you it's not his choice of teams if he enters the PSD. Any attempt to discourage a team from drafting him will be met with draft tampering charges
Don't you understand this?
You do understand that a player cannot refuse to be picked up by a club in the draft if they meet his terms, don't you? Unless they would like to sit the year out...You do understand a contract requires Danger's signature, don't you?
That's utter rubbish. That requirement only applies when a player is first drafted. A substantive reason for free agency came from the AFLPA who said we'll accept a player has to go where drafted initially but after that the player should have the major say in where he plays. It's the very reason why inevitably players end-up at clubs of their choice. It's the way things get done nowadays.Oh sorry you meant he wouldn't sign on at Carlton, but the issue there is when you register as a player in the AFL you abide by the conditions set, that you will go to any team that drafts you it's not his choice of teams if he enters the PSD. Any attempt to discourage a team from drafting him will be met with draft tampering charges
Don't you understand this?
What? Why would an experienced player have different rules to a rookie in the same draft? Think about what you are saying. It would make the whole point of a draft ridiculous.That's utter rubbish. That requirement only applies when a player is first drafted. A substantive reason for free agency came from the AFLPA who said we'll accept a player has to go where drafted initially but after that the player should have the major say in where he plays. It's the very reason why inevitably players end-up at clubs of their choice. It's the way things get done nowadays.
That's utter rubbish. That requirement only applies when a player is first drafted. A substantive reason for free agency came from the AFLPA who said we'll accept a player has to go where drafted initially but after that the player should have the major say in where he plays. It's the very reason why inevitably players end-up at clubs of their choice. It's the way things get done nowadays.
You can't continually deny a player choice as to where he plays/gets his livelihood. Watch what is occurring in practice. Players now nominate their club of choice and invariably end-up at that club.What? Why would an experienced player have different rules to a rookie in the same draft? Think about what you are saying. It would make the whole point of a draft ridiculous.
Need a simpleton gif.Need a face palm gif
He's just acting stupid right guys?... Right?
That's utter rubbish. That requirement only applies when a player is first drafted. A substantive reason for free agency came from the AFLPA who said we'll accept a player has to go where drafted initially but after that the player should have the major say in where he plays. It's the very reason why inevitably players end-up at clubs of their choice. It's the way things get done nowadays.
You can't continually deny a player choice as to where he plays/gets his livelihood. Watch what is occurring in practice. Players now nominate their club of choice and invariably end-up at that club.
Read the AFLPA player agreement before you make a further fool of yourself. Frankly you have NFI.Hahaha go away you have no idea or you are trying to take the pisss out of us.
That is because Geelong's (and every other club's) list managers aren't as daft as you. They will agree to a reasonable trade before it gets to the draft. Or else they may not get their man. Otherwise no Paddy to Geelong!!You can't continually deny a player choice as to where he plays/gets his livelihood. Watch what is occurring in practice. Players now nominate their club of choice and invariably end-up at that club.
Read the AFLPA player agreement before you make a further fool of yourself. Frankly you have NFI.
You should ask Mahlepi's opinion on the matter...You are for real, this is gold are all Geeling BF posters as bright as you?
You can't continually deny a player choice as to where he plays/gets his livelihood. Watch what is occurring in practice. Players now nominate their club of choice and invariably end-up at that club.
More accurately, are all Adelaide posters as dumb as you?You are for real, this is gold are all Geeling BF posters as bright as you?
Here's had about four different incarnations on the Geelong board. As _me_ he assured us Boak was signed,sealed, and delivered.You should ask Mahlepi's opinion on the matter...
You do understand a contract requires Danger's signature, don't you?
More accurately, are all Adelaide posters as dumb as you?
Now go away and study the AFLPA agreement before you make a further tool of yourself. I'm sure you can find someone who will help you understand it.
Does it once he enters the draft? All he can do is nominate his terms on his contract. So if its 6 years for 800 or whatever any club can take him, they just have to give him that contract. He would then be stuck there for 6 years.
That is because Geelong's (and every other club's) list managers aren't as daft as you. They will agree to a reasonable trade before it gets to the draft. Or else they may not get their man. Otherwise no Paddy to Geelong!!
And the Luke Ball/ Kurt Tippett arguments are irrelevant. They were asking way above value, whereas Geelong's 'official' offer will be affordable.
Of course any club can offer attempt to lure him. There are clubs who would offer him more than the Cats. In the end it's his choice and up to the respective clubs to attempt to sort out terms or in some circumstances accept the AFL compensation arrangements.Does it once he enters the draft? All he can do is nominate his terms on his contract. So if its 6 years for 800 or whatever any club can take him, they just have to give him that contract. He would then be stuck there for 6 years.