- Jul 26, 2020
- 12,596
- 34,906
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
The posters playing down his 5 goal achievement as if it happens all the time.Who's bothered?
View attachment 1367152
The posters playing down his 5 goal achievement as if it happens all the time.
The posters who would rather cut off their own nose then admit Marshall might be a decent player playing in a shit system.
And there it isYou keep carrying on like people don't want him to succeed.
When he plays a ripper game not on Billy Frampton, I'll be full of praise.
And there it is
The criticism went from we just want to see him compete to we want him to kick bags on guys that aren’t billy Frampton.
As I’ve said before, you lot will ask him to cure cancer while kicking the tonne before you concede he’s a first 22 player.
Your post made me go check my posts in this thread.Who's bothered?
View attachment 1367152
It needn't be cancer. It could be any range of life threatening ailments. Heart disease, diabetes.As I’ve said before, you lot will ask him to cure cancer while kicking the tonne before you concede he’s a first 22 player.
No I'm correcting your stats. Again.Ah my bad you’re right, he’s done it a whopping 5 times in his career at port. Did it twice in 2016 which I missed
None of that really changes anything. You’re arguing semantics
Dixon has only kicked 5 or more goals 5 times In his career at port still means the same thing.
Trying to call into question the prior efforts of Charlie Dixon with some incorrect, cherry picked stats that do not take into account
Sorry, I could have put it better. Maybe not cherry picked. But certainly failed to present Dixon's career stats in their proper context, for reasons I have already given ad naseum.that’s not even remotely what I was doing. You ******* know that’s not what I was doing. You have absolutely no intention of arguing in any kind of rational manner.
Pointing out how many times a star kf has kicked 5 goals for us previously when posters are playing down Marshall’s 5 goal haul isn’t calling into question Dixon’s efforts and it’s completely irrational to suggest so.
It’s showing how rare an achievement it is in our system.
It’s not a cherry picked stat. Marshall kicked 5 goals, it’s a completely relevant piece of information to chase up how many times our star kf has kicked that amount in the same system.
I have actually quite liked that Hinkley has put it on Todd/asked him to lead the forward line and be the second ruck. It’s a demand to stand up and I think Todd has busted his guts to do it. It’s probably what Todd needed. It would be nice if Todd had some support in the form of another tall forward but I would keep demanding Todd step up and be the main man until Dixon is back.
Again based on what? The eye test of him up againzt the best ruck duo in the comp?Unfortunately Marshall is inadequate as a second ruck.
Since when? He was outbodied and beaten by Tom Green when pinch hitting in the ruck against GWS last year.Again based on what? The eye test of him up againzt the best ruck duo in the comp?
He's an adequate forward pinch hitting ruck.
Imagine Marshall with two defenders hanging off him every week instead of dining out on Billy Frampton lol.
Exactly!That would be a failure of strategy and structure. In other words, it would be par for this coaching team.
That would be great. I would take that for sure. If Marshall is drawing two defenders then he is doing his job and another forward should be free. Whether we have the strategy or forward craft to exploit is another question.Imagine Marshall with two defenders hanging off him every week instead of dining out on Billy Frampton lol.
That would be great. I would take that for sure. If Marshall is drawing two defenders then he is doing his job and another forward should be free. Whether we have the strategy or forward craft to exploit is another question.
The reality is Marshall is being asked to play as the main forward and pinch hit in the ruck. It’s not a role he has played before or is necessarily built for. But he is giving it his all and it’s a good test for him. Demand the leadership, aggression and forward craft of him. Demand he step up. He can’t sneak by with a no goal, under 5 touch game in this role. 5 goals against an average defence is still Todd stepping up and being the key forward and target. He’ll be up and down but Todd looks to be embracing what the club has asked off him in Dixon’s absence.
His 9 touch, 0 score game last week was truly a sight to behold.
He certainly wasn't alone in that, but let's not act like he's had a breakout or anything. There was still a huge amount of intercept marks in our back half. He's nowhere near close to holding that forward line together like Dixon has been forced to.
His 9 touch, 0 score game last week was truly a sight to behold.
He certainly wasn't alone in that, but let's not act like he's had a breakout or anything. There was still a huge amount of intercept marks in our back half. He's nowhere near close to holding that forward line together like Dixon has been forced to.
It is very clear that the Marshall bar is set exceptionally low by his fanbois when a 9 touch zero score game becomes a source of encouragement.
I think you’re missing the point. We don’t have any other options. I would like Hayes in the side but he isn’t a ruck. Finlayson, Mitch and Todd are second/third tall types. Lord isn’t ready and, as a third round pick, is unlikely to make it. Todd is talented but has lacked consistency and mongrel. Asking Todd to be the main man is asking him to step up and be that forward focus. The guy isn’t Dixon in frame, style or experience - never will be. But his effort and endeavour have lifted as he has been forced to play the lead role. He is learning. He will be up and down and he may not reach the standard we want. Not a break out but better than previous and in a different role. He needs to be cut some slack. He is busting a gut.
I think you’re missing the point. We don’t have any other options. I would like Hayes in the side but he isn’t a ruck. Finlayson, Mitch and Todd are second/third tall types. Lord isn’t ready and, as a third round pick, is unlikely to make it. Todd is talented but has lacked consistency and mongrel. Asking Todd to be the main man is asking him to step up and be that forward focus. The guy isn’t Dixon in frame, style or experience - never will be. But his effort and endeavour have lifted as he has been forced to play the lead role. He is learning. He will be up and down and he may not reach the standard we want. Not a break out but better than previous and in a different role. He needs to be cut some slack. He is busting a gut.
A bunch of mobile leading talls and a bunch of dumb campaigners telling the mids to close their eyes and believe charlie will catch it.Marshall had to play after his 5 goal outing versus the camries, no one would dispute that. He didn't back it up with a performance to excite anyone though.
I do wonder if Lord was the first round draft pick and Marshall the third round pick 'unlikely to make it' - where would you and Ken's selection pivot.
The club has completely botched it's list management - take out Aliir, Dixon and Lycett and what genuine height and talent do we have?
Every forward has been some variation of dog shit so far
Tell me one forward who hasn't been complete and utter shit in one of the four games.
Even sam Mayes had a full half of footy with 0 touches against Melbourne and we kicked to him like he was 210cm.