Of the 5 the one I'm least keen on is MacDonald - I just don't see where he fits, and when he played for Gippy the times I saw him he just didn't stand out. I don't know where the outstanding AFL qualities are.
agree with this, while i think we need a player of his type, im just not sure he is hard working enough and defensive enough to be effective in modern football.
This is a tremendous post - and I completely agree with your reasoning.
I'm not disappointed with Conca purely for those reasons - we've got a footballer and a guy with outstanding character - he's much more of a sure bet than most. I wasn't sold on the ceiling - I just don't know how high it is - but the club obviously sees the ceiling being significantly high enough to warrant him being taken at 6.
i can see what your saying, and i agree, i cant see him really ever reaching cotchims, martins or deledio's level, or potential level. however i can see him being as good as foley. at this stage of our development im happy to take a safe bet mid who can still be A grade without being a top 20 player in the comp.
its good to have players who can be stars of the competition, but with the players available that could reach that superstar level, they were just too risky and although i would have been happy with heppel, i dont think were missing too much by taking say batchelor at 30 over heppell. heppell is your creative type and certainly more attacking and exciting, but batchelor can be a good solid back flanker, im not sure heppell will ever be a pure mid.
like you said that type of player who can rebound but also stay tight on his opponent is absolutely vital, and something connors doesnt do naturally.